發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-28 10:16

【摘要】：“城中村”是我國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程中出現(xiàn)的一種特有的現(xiàn)象。在改革開(kāi)放后的30多年間里，一些經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)城市的范圍迅速擴(kuò)張。原先分布在城市周邊的農(nóng)村被納入城市的版圖，，被鱗次櫛比的高樓大廈所包圍，成為了“都市里的村莊”。 土地是城市的稀缺資源，特別是對(duì)于廣州這樣特大型城市的土地，更是具有巨大的價(jià)值。但是由于在以前城市土地閑置浪費(fèi)嚴(yán)重，土地利用效率低，導(dǎo)致當(dāng)今土地資源瓶頸。因此迫切需要進(jìn)行土地整理，挖掘潛在建設(shè)用地，進(jìn)行土地集約化利用。土地資源的日益短缺，已制約了城市的發(fā)展，通過(guò)加強(qiáng)“三舊”改造，贏得土地和發(fā)展空間，成為當(dāng)前政府工作的重點(diǎn)。通過(guò)城中村改造，優(yōu)化土地資源配置，保障和促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)又好又快的發(fā)展。值得興慶的是，廣州市政府也一直對(duì)廣州市“城中村”問(wèn)題給予高度重視。從2009年以來(lái)，廣東省、廣州市分別出臺(tái)了“三舊”改造相關(guān)政策文件，用以加快“城中村”改造的步伐。 本文首先通過(guò)“城中村”形成的歷史背景和面臨的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析，再通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)現(xiàn)行改造政策的解讀，提出政策所存在的相關(guān)漏洞，最后通過(guò)對(duì)廣州市海珠區(qū)兩個(gè)“城中村”改造的實(shí)際案例進(jìn)行對(duì)比，對(duì)“城中村”改造過(guò)程中的改造模式的選擇、成本核算的核定進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析、論述。最后就這兩條“城中村”改造過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的一系列問(wèn)題，提出了“拆整結(jié)合、連片改造”的兩個(gè)新的改造模式，以求為后續(xù)的廣州“城中村”改造問(wèn)題研究及實(shí)踐提供有益的參考。
[Abstract]:"Chengzhong Village" is a unique phenomenon in the process of China's urbanization. Over the past 30 years after the reform and opening-up, some of the economically developed regions have expanded rapidly. The rural areas originally distributed in the periphery of the city are integrated into the layout of the city and are surrounded by the high-rise buildings in the scale of the scale and the "the city's village". The land is a scarce resource of the city, especially the land of the super-large city such as Guangzhou, which is of great value. However, because of the serious waste of the land in the previous cities and the low utilization efficiency of the land, the present land resource bottleneck has been caused. Therefore, it is urgent to carry out the land consolidation, to tap the potential construction land and to make the land intensive use. The shortage of the land resources has restricted the development of the city. The land and development space has become the focus of the current government's work through the strengthening of the "three old" transformation. The city government has also paid great attention to the problem of the "village in the city of Guangzhou" since 2009. Since 2009, Guangdong and Guangzhou have introduced the "three old" reform-related policy documents to speed up the "transformation of the village" in the city. In this paper, the historical background and the problems of the formation of the village in the city are analyzed, and the relevant loopholes in the policy are put forward through the interpretation of the relevant current transformation policy. Finally, the author makes a detailed analysis and discussion on the selection of the transformation pattern and the approval of the cost accounting in the transformation of the two cities in Haizhu District, Guangzhou.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.114

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜杰;都市里村莊的世紀(jì)抉擇——關(guān)于深圳市羅湖區(qū)原農(nóng)村城市化進(jìn)程的調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];城市規(guī)劃;1999年09期

2 房慶方,馬向明,宋勁松;城中村:從廣東看我國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程中遇到的政策問(wèn)題[J];城市規(guī)劃;1999年09期

3 魏立華,閆小培;“城中村”:存續(xù)前提下的轉(zhuǎn)型——兼論“城中村”改造的可行性模式[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年07期

4 廖俊平,田一淋;PPP模式與城中村改造[J];城市開(kāi)發(fā);2005年03期

5 陳怡,潘蜀健;廣州城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部管理問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];城市問(wèn)題;1999年05期

6 田莉;“都市里的鄉(xiāng)村”現(xiàn)象評(píng)析──兼論鄉(xiāng)村─城市轉(zhuǎn)型期的矛盾與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;1998年05期

7 Paul Knox;周文承;;隱蔽的市郊[J];地理譯報(bào);1993年03期

8 顧朝林,熊江波;簡(jiǎn)論城市邊緣區(qū)研究[J];地理研究;1989年03期

9 李增軍 ,謝祿生;都市里的“村莊”現(xiàn)象[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)工作導(dǎo)刊;1995年08期

10 周大鳴;論都市邊緣農(nóng)村社區(qū)的都市化——廣東都市化研究之一[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1993年06期

本文編號(hào)：2507217