【摘要】：2012年全國(guó)船檢工作會(huì)議工作報(bào)告總結(jié)了船檢工作,明確了當(dāng)前船檢的目標(biāo)和任務(wù),同時(shí)指出目前船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)后評(píng)估機(jī)制尚不健全,海事局亟需加強(qiáng)船檢信息化建設(shè),構(gòu)建合理的船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)后評(píng)估工作流程迫在眉睫。船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)包括了一系列的船檢技術(shù)規(guī)則、規(guī)范以及支持文件,由海事局制訂和發(fā)布,是執(zhí)行船檢的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。國(guó)際公約的更新和新技術(shù)、新能源的出現(xiàn)對(duì)船檢水平提出更高的要求,船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)隨之不斷更新,定期發(fā)布修改通報(bào)。然而以被動(dòng)接收到的信息作為修改通報(bào)的依據(jù)并不完全符合我國(guó)船檢的實(shí)際,船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)修改通報(bào)的制訂和發(fā)布必須建立在科學(xué)、合理的后評(píng)估機(jī)制之上,從而系統(tǒng)地、全面地評(píng)價(jià)船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)的立法目的、合理性、合法性及其它因素,以提高船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)的立法質(zhì)量,推動(dòng)船舶檢驗(yàn)科學(xué)化發(fā)展。本文在閱讀了大量的文獻(xiàn)基礎(chǔ)上,將項(xiàng)目后評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)理論應(yīng)用到了船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)后評(píng)估機(jī)制建立中,從海事局的角度對(duì)船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)后評(píng)估的流程進(jìn)行重構(gòu),構(gòu)建了一套科學(xué)、合理的后評(píng)估指標(biāo),同時(shí)根據(jù)定性指標(biāo)的特點(diǎn),選用AHP層次分析法建立后評(píng)估的模型,通過(guò)實(shí)例分析,得到了后評(píng)估的結(jié)果,證明了船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)后評(píng)估機(jī)制的合理性和可行性。船檢技術(shù)法規(guī)后評(píng)估機(jī)制的建立有利于提高船檢工作及法規(guī)編制的能力和水平,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與造船業(yè)升級(jí)轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展的匹配和良性互動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:The work report of the 2012 National ship Survey Conference summarizes the ship survey work, clarifies the objectives and tasks of the current ship survey, and points out that the current post-evaluation mechanism of the ship survey technical regulations is not perfect, and the maritime bureau urgently needs to strengthen the information construction of the ship survey. It is urgent to construct a reasonable work flow after ship inspection technical regulations. The technical regulations of ship inspection include a series of technical rules, specifications and supporting documents of ship inspection, which are formulated and issued by the Bureau of Maritime Affairs and are the technical standards for carrying out the inspection of ships. The renewal of international conventions and new technologies and the emergence of new energy put forward higher requirements to the level of ship inspection, and the technical regulations of ship inspection are constantly updated, and periodic circulars of revision are issued. However, taking the information received passively as the basis for revising the notification is not completely in line with the reality of ship inspection in China. The formulation and issuance of the technical and regulatory amendments to ship survey must be based on a scientific and reasonable post-evaluation mechanism, so as to systematically, The legislative purpose, rationality, legitimacy and other factors of the technical regulations for ship survey are comprehensively evaluated in order to improve the legislative quality of the technical regulations of ship survey and to promote the scientific development of ship survey. On the basis of reading a large number of documents, this paper applies the theory of project post-evaluation to the establishment of post-evaluation mechanism of ship-survey technical regulations, reconstructs the process of post-evaluation of ship-survey technical regulations from the point of view of MSA, and constructs a set of science. At the same time, according to the characteristics of qualitative indexes, AHP Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to establish the post-evaluation model, and the results of post-evaluation are obtained through an example analysis. The rationality and feasibility of post-evaluation mechanism of ship inspection technical regulations are proved. The establishment of post-evaluation mechanism of ship survey technical regulations is conducive to improving the capability and level of ship survey work and the compilation of regulations, thus realizing the matching and benign interaction between the technical standards and the transformation and development of shipbuilding industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：U692.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王衛(wèi)民;;船舶檢驗(yàn):發(fā)展水運(yùn)事業(yè)的基礎(chǔ)[J];大陸橋視野;2008年04期

2 毛新政;;周期性立法評(píng)估制度的構(gòu)建及其必要性探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年20期

3 崔耀東,周儒榮,廖文和;制造業(yè)信息系統(tǒng)應(yīng)用評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2001年06期

4 章劍;;我國(guó)船舶檢驗(yàn)管理體制存在的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];航海技術(shù);2006年06期

5 蘇黎蘭;張紫薇;張志;;基于定量分析的立法后評(píng)估方法[J];理論月刊;2012年03期

6 孫培廷;;“十二五”期間航運(yùn)業(yè)和造船業(yè)熱點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題[J];世界海運(yùn);2013年01期

7 張新紅;用神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型評(píng)價(jià)高技術(shù)項(xiàng)目的投資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];情報(bào)學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

8 徐緒松,但朝陽(yáng);高技術(shù)項(xiàng)目投資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年01期

9 龍曉林;;美國(guó)行政立法后評(píng)估概況[J];探求;2008年01期

10 徐平;;國(guó)外立法評(píng)估的啟示[J];人民政壇;2010年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王廣浩;建設(shè)項(xiàng)目后評(píng)價(jià)內(nèi)容完善與方法研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年

2 熊強(qiáng);企業(yè)信息化項(xiàng)目績(jī)效評(píng)估及實(shí)證分析[D];江蘇大學(xué);2005年

3 孟祥東;基于AHP-模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法的水源地安全評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];河北工程大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2177435