【摘要】：自十一屆三中全會后,我國開始了以經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)為中心的經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革,從目前的情況來看,經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革取得的成就是舉世矚目的。然而隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的不斷深入,社會隱藏的問題也不斷涌現(xiàn),其中政治體制改革并沒有于經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革同步進(jìn)行,這一問題逐漸引起人們的關(guān)注，并成為當(dāng)前改革的重點(diǎn)。 交易費(fèi)用理論是新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的重要分析工具，政治型交易費(fèi)用是交易費(fèi)用的重要組成部分，可以用這一理論來分析我國政治體制改革的必要性。在梳理清楚當(dāng)前中國政治模型、中央與地方的關(guān)系、利益集團(tuán)現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,通過分析改革開放以來影響我國政治型交易費(fèi)用的因素,利用SEM思想構(gòu)建MIMIC模型,首次建立我國政治型交易費(fèi)用測度體系,刻畫了1978年以來政治型交易費(fèi)用在我國的發(fā)展態(tài)勢。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),政治型交易費(fèi)用在體制轉(zhuǎn)型時期可以分為三個階段,各階段呈現(xiàn)出不同的變化趨勢；經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平和利益集團(tuán)的存在對政治型交易費(fèi)用有正的效應(yīng)，，而城市化率和信息技術(shù)的發(fā)展對政治型交易費(fèi)用具有負(fù)的效應(yīng)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用新古典主義理論來分析政治型交易費(fèi)用對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響,發(fā)現(xiàn),觀階段我國政治型交易費(fèi)用的最佳規(guī)模為國民生產(chǎn)總值的9.64%然而自1990年開始我國政治型交易費(fèi)用的規(guī)模就已經(jīng)超過了這一數(shù)值,并呈緩慢增長的態(tài)勢,說明規(guī)模過大的政治型交易費(fèi)用已經(jīng)阻礙了經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,政治體制改革勢在必行。
[Abstract]:Since the third Plenary session of the Eleventh Central Committee, China has begun the economic system reform with economic construction as the center. From the current situation, the achievements of the economic system reform have attracted worldwide attention. However, with the deepening of the reform of economic system, the hidden problems of society are also emerging, among which the reform of political system has not been carried out simultaneously with the reform of economic system, which has gradually aroused people's attention and become the focus of the current reform. Transaction cost theory is an important analysis tool of new institutional economics, and political transaction cost is an important part of transaction cost, which can be used to analyze the necessity of political system reform in our country. On the basis of analyzing the current Chinese political model, the relationship between the central government and the local government, and the current situation of interest groups, and by analyzing the factors that affect the political transaction costs since the reform and opening up, the MIMIC model is constructed by using SEM's thought. It is the first time to establish the measurement system of the political transaction cost in China, which depicts the development trend of the political transaction cost in our country since 1978. The results show that the political transaction costs can be divided into three stages in the period of institutional transformation, each stage shows different trends, and the level of economic development and the existence of interest groups have positive effects on the political transaction costs. The rate of urbanization and the development of information technology have a negative effect on political transaction costs. On this basis, using neoclassical theory to analyze the impact of political transaction costs on economic growth, we find that, The best scale of China's political transaction cost is 9.64% of GNP. However, since 1990, the scale of China's political transaction cost has exceeded this value, and has shown a trend of slow growth. It shows that the large scale of political transaction cost has hindered the development of economy, political system reform is imperative.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D61;F124.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王磊;;公共產(chǎn)品供給主體及邊界確定的交易費(fèi)用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析——兼論我國公共產(chǎn)品供給過程中交易費(fèi)用的計量[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2007年04期

2 金玉國;王琳;;政治型交易成本測算的兩個維度及其關(guān)系——基于中國分省份截面數(shù)據(jù)的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2010年01期

3 何有良;秦強(qiáng);;我國財政分權(quán)與地方經(jīng)濟(jì)增長關(guān)系的實證研究[J];財會月刊;2010年21期

4 劉志銘;申建博;;交易費(fèi)用的測度：理論的發(fā)展及應(yīng)用[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年10期

5 劉承禮;;理解當(dāng)代中國的中央與地方關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2008年05期

6 李軍杰,鐘君;中國地方政府經(jīng)濟(jì)行為分析——基于公共選擇視角[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年04期

7 卜凡;;社會轉(zhuǎn)型期中國利益集團(tuán)與民主政治建設(shè)關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

8 蘇振華;常偉;;公共選擇視角下的集體行動效率及其制度含義[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2008年06期

9 馬駿;交易費(fèi)用政治學(xué):現(xiàn)狀與前景[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年01期

10 馬駿,侯一麟;中國省級預(yù)算中的非正式制度:一個交易費(fèi)用理論框架[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年10期

本文編號：2181588