【摘要】：產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策在引導(dǎo)資源優(yōu)化配置和生產(chǎn)要素合理流動(dòng)上具有重要作用。然而,隨著國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作程度日益密切,單個(gè)國(guó)家的產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策制定的影響力日趨國(guó)際化,產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持與貿(mào)易沖突之間的協(xié)調(diào)值得關(guān)注。面對(duì)日益復(fù)雜的國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境,僅僅依靠政府使用產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策來(lái)推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠的。我國(guó)正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期,產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策在將來(lái)相當(dāng)長(zhǎng)的一段時(shí)期里會(huì)繼續(xù)引導(dǎo)著結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整、影響著經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,因此,推動(dòng)國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策與國(guó)際貿(mào)易規(guī)則相協(xié)調(diào),對(duì)提升我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)的國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力具有重要意義。本文對(duì)我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策現(xiàn)狀及補(bǔ)貼方式進(jìn)行了闡述,并對(duì)比WTO規(guī)則及有關(guān)成員方國(guó)內(nèi)法情況,為我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策補(bǔ)貼方式的調(diào)整提供借鑒,同時(shí)通過(guò)列舉國(guó)外對(duì)華的貿(mào)易摩擦案例,指出我國(guó)目前補(bǔ)貼規(guī)則的不足之處,最后提出能與WTO規(guī)則相適應(yīng)的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策補(bǔ)貼方式調(diào)整建議。本文研究認(rèn)為：WTO框架并不是排斥一切政府干預(yù),而是期望政府將關(guān)注重點(diǎn)更多地放在基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、人力資源等供給方面,因此產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策要在“競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中立”理念的指導(dǎo)下,積極實(shí)施國(guó)民待遇和最惠國(guó)待遇,嘗試從傳統(tǒng)的企業(yè)生產(chǎn)補(bǔ)貼向消費(fèi)者補(bǔ)貼轉(zhuǎn)型,同時(shí)要提高出臺(tái)產(chǎn)業(yè)扶持政策的合規(guī)性,充分發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的經(jīng)濟(jì)功能和影響力,營(yíng)造公平公正的企業(yè)發(fā)展環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:Industrial support policy plays an important role in guiding the optimal allocation of resources and rational flow of production factors. However, with the increasing degree of international economic cooperation, the influence of industrial support policy formulation in individual countries is becoming more and more international, and the coordination between industrial support and trade conflicts is worthy of attention. In the face of the increasingly complex international economic environment, it is far from enough to rely on the government to use industrial support policies to promote economic development. China is in the period of economic structural transformation, and the industrial support policy will continue to guide the structural adjustment and affect the economic development in a very long period in the future. Therefore, it is necessary to promote the coordination of domestic industrial policies and international trade rules. It is of great significance to enhance the international competitiveness of our industry. This paper expounds the status quo and subsidy methods of industrial support policy in China, and compares the WTO rules with the domestic laws of relevant member countries, which provides a reference for the adjustment of subsidy mode of industrial support policy in China. At the same time, by enumerating the cases of foreign trade frictions against China, this paper points out the deficiencies of China's current subsidy rules, and finally puts forward some suggestions for adjusting the subsidy mode of industrial policies which can adapt to the WTO rules. This paper argues that the "WTO" framework does not exclude all government intervention, but rather expects the government to focus more on infrastructure construction, technological innovation, and human resources supply. Therefore, the industrial support policy should actively implement the national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment under the guidance of the idea of "establishing in competition", try to transform from the traditional enterprise production subsidy to the consumer subsidy, and at the same time improve the compliance of the industrial support policy. Give full play to its economic function and influence, and create a fair and just environment for enterprise development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F121.3;F743.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李婧;;美國(guó)對(duì)華銅版紙反補(bǔ)貼案帶來(lái)的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年02期

2 劉林靜;;從銅版紙案看美國(guó)對(duì)非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家適用反補(bǔ)貼的新趨勢(shì)[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年11期

3 朱欖葉;政府與企業(yè)共同面對(duì)——中國(guó)面臨的補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼問(wèn)題研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2005年04期

4 郭策;;中國(guó)面臨的反補(bǔ)貼及其在WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的救濟(jì)[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2011年09期

5 龔柏華;;美國(guó)就中國(guó)貿(mào)易稅收補(bǔ)貼政策在WTO與中國(guó)磋商案評(píng)述[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2007年02期

6 屠新泉;;中國(guó)加入WTO以來(lái)的美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易政策[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年11期

7 武長(zhǎng)海;評(píng)美國(guó)反補(bǔ)貼法修改及對(duì)我國(guó)的影響和對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2005年80期

8 吳蔚;;美國(guó)對(duì)華反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查的主要特征及應(yīng)對(duì)策略——基于終審案件的分析[J];開(kāi)發(fā)研究;2012年02期

9 何艷;;WTO框架下的美國(guó)主要補(bǔ)貼政策分析[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2004年12期

10 白巴根;;對(duì)“轉(zhuǎn)型經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家”的反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查與補(bǔ)貼的認(rèn)定——以美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)出口銅版紙反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查為例[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2007年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 中共陜西省委黨校法學(xué)部 劉素霞;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2145804