本文選題：江蘇省 + 浙江省��； 參考：《中共江蘇省委黨�！�2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從黨的十六大提出了以“統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展”為首的五個統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略以來，中國各級政府采取了各種有力措施推動城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展，各省份地區(qū)在城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌方面也取得較大進展，而地處長三角兩翼的江蘇和浙江兩省在城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展方面無疑是走在全國前列的，但是目前針對兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌道路進行比較研究文獻較少，且現(xiàn)有文獻存在較為明顯的缺陷比如研究對象過于具體、沒有定量分析和數(shù)據(jù)模型支撐、研究結(jié)論過于片面等等。在這種背景下，為更好的利用江浙兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路所取得的經(jīng)驗，，本文將針對江浙兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌道路進行一個全面的比較分析。 本文立足于區(qū)域經(jīng)濟學(xué)、發(fā)展經(jīng)濟學(xué)、政治經(jīng)濟學(xué)、計量經(jīng)濟學(xué)以及區(qū)域可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論等相關(guān)學(xué)科的理論基礎(chǔ)對江浙兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路進行比較研究。在充分利用經(jīng)濟學(xué)經(jīng)典理論對兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路進行定性分析的基礎(chǔ)上，借管理學(xué)、統(tǒng)計學(xué)等相關(guān)學(xué)科的方法，借助Super Decisions、SPSS等軟件進行定量分析。 本文的主要研究內(nèi)容是：對有關(guān)城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展的文獻從各個方面包括起源、內(nèi)涵、原因、障礙和措施等方面做了詳細(xì)的梳理，在此基礎(chǔ)上將有關(guān)江浙兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路的文獻進行了回顧與簡評；構(gòu)造了包含經(jīng)濟、社會、環(huán)境、空間等四大子系統(tǒng)的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展水平評價體系，測算了江浙兩省2000—2011年的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展水平并進行對比；利用SPSS軟件運用因子分析模型對影響江浙兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路的各種因子進行測算并針對測算結(jié)果提出相關(guān)政策建議。通過研究本文得到的主要結(jié)論為：（1）江浙兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路雖然存在一致，但是兩者仍存在各自特點；（2）江浙兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展水平位居全國前列并且總體水平差距不大；（3）江浙兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌道路存在明顯差異，江蘇省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌道路是“在政府主導(dǎo)下的城市帶動農(nóng)村型”的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路，而浙江省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌道路是“在市場主導(dǎo)下的農(nóng)村包圍城市型”的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路。 本文通過構(gòu)建城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展水平的評價體系，測算了江浙兩省2010—2011年的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展水平，并對兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路進行了包括定性和定量分析等比較分析，得出了江浙兩省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌道路并不相同的結(jié)論并且進一步通過因子分析將兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路的各自特點進行了歸納，使得江浙兩省的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展道路的特點由具體層面上升到了抽象層面，為全國其它省份地區(qū)的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略提供了參考和建議。
[Abstract]:Since the 16th National Congress of the Party put forward the five overall development strategies headed by "coordinating urban and rural development", Chinese governments at all levels have taken various measures to promote the overall development of urban and rural areas, and various provinces and regions have also made great progress in urban and rural planning. Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, which are located on the two flanks of the Yangtze River Delta, are undoubtedly at the forefront of the country in terms of overall urban and rural development, but there are few comparative studies on the urban and rural overall planning roads of the two provinces at present. And the existing literature has obvious defects, such as the research object is too specific, there is no quantitative analysis and data model support, the research conclusion is too one-sided and so on. Under this background, in order to make better use of the experience of the urban and rural overall development of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, this paper will carry out a comprehensive comparative analysis of the urban and rural overall planning roads of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. Based on the theories of regional economics, development economics, political economics, econometrics and the theory of regional sustainable development, this paper makes a comparative study on the urban and rural development of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. On the basis of making full use of the classical theory of economics to qualitatively analyze the development road of urban and rural areas in two provinces, and by using the methods of management, statistics and other related subjects, and with the help of software such as Super decisions and SPSS, the quantitative analysis is carried out. The main research contents of this paper are as follows: the literature on the overall development of urban and rural areas has been combed in detail from various aspects, including origin, connotation, reasons, obstacles and measures, etc. On this basis, the paper reviews and reviews the literature on the road of urban and rural development in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, constructs an evaluation system of urban and rural overall development level, which includes four subsystems: economy, society, environment and space. The urban and rural development level of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces from 2000 to 2011 is calculated and compared. This paper uses SPSS software to calculate the factors affecting the overall development of urban and rural areas in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces by using factor analysis model and puts forward some relevant policy suggestions on the results of calculation. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) although the urban and rural development paths of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are consistent, they still have their own characteristics; (2) the urban and rural overall development level of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces is in the forefront of the whole country and the overall level gap is not big; (3) there are obvious differences between Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces in urban and rural overall planning road. The road of urban-rural overall planning in Jiangsu Province is the road of urban-rural overall development "under the guidance of the government", while that of Zhejiang Province is the road of urban-rural overall development "surrounded by the countryside under the market". By constructing an evaluation system of the overall development level of urban and rural areas, this paper estimates the overall development level of urban and rural areas in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces in 2010-2011, and makes a comparative analysis of the development paths of urban and rural areas in the two provinces, including qualitative and quantitative analysis, etc. It draws the conclusion that the urban and rural overall planning roads of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are not the same, and further sums up the respective characteristics of the urban and rural overall development roads of the two provinces through factor analysis. The characteristics of the urban and rural overall development of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces have been raised from the specific level to the abstract level, which provides a reference and suggestions for other provinces of the country to plan the development strategy of urban and rural areas.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中共江蘇省委黨校
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F127

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 江小涓;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級:新階段和新任務(wù)[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2005年04期

2 蔡之兵;祖強;;我國對外直接投資增長的影響因素研究——基于因子分析模型[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報);2012年03期

3 任迎偉;胡國平;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌中產(chǎn)業(yè)互動研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2008年08期

4 范劍平,向書堅;我國城鄉(xiāng)人口二元社會結(jié)構(gòu)對居民消費率的影響[J];管理世界;1999年05期

5 宋洪遠(yuǎn),龐麗華,趙長保;統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng),加快農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展——當(dāng)前的農(nóng)村問題和未來的政策選擇[J];管理世界;2003年11期

6 王夢奎;關(guān)于統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展和統(tǒng)籌區(qū)域發(fā)展[J];管理世界;2004年04期

7 張紅宇;城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的平抑機制:工業(yè)化中期階段的經(jīng)濟增長與政府行為選擇[J];管理世界;2004年04期

8 馬曉河;藍(lán)海濤;黃漢權(quán);;工業(yè)反哺農(nóng)業(yè)的國際經(jīng)驗及我國的政策調(diào)整思路[J];管理世界;2005年07期

9 孫寧華;堵溢;洪永淼;;勞動力市場扭曲、效率差異與城鄉(xiāng)收入差距[J];管理世界;2009年09期

10 沈坤榮;余吉祥;;農(nóng)村勞動力流動對中國城鎮(zhèn)居民收入的影響——基于市場化進程中城鄉(xiāng)勞動力分工視角的研究[J];管理世界;2011年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 韓兆洲;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展統(tǒng)計測度研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 楊麗莉;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的物流園區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)布局評價研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2011年

2 單執(zhí)中;發(fā)展的測度—理論、方法與分析[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

3 鄭慧玲;基于城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角的城市化問題研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

4 代閱民;統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展，走向城鄉(xiāng)一體化[D];廈門大學(xué);2006年

5 荊玲玲;黑龍江省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展水平評價與對策研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2007年

6 楊建濤;河南省城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展測度研究[D];河南大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：2113283