【摘要】：對(duì)技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化的研究雖然興起于西方學(xué)者對(duì)資本主義科學(xué)技術(shù)雙重功能的批判,但技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化并不是資本主義社會(huì)的特有現(xiàn)象,它在任何一個(gè)階級(jí)社會(huì)都有可能產(chǎn)生。在前資本主義的階級(jí)社會(huì)中,技術(shù)在有限的范圍內(nèi)發(fā)生作用,對(duì)社會(huì)無法產(chǎn)生重大影響,技術(shù)的意識(shí)形態(tài)化并不明顯;而在資本主義時(shí)代,技術(shù)的意識(shí)形態(tài)出場方式發(fā)生了根本的變化,技術(shù)開始影響和規(guī)范政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等一切生活領(lǐng)域,技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化才開始逐漸被人們所認(rèn)識(shí)。技術(shù)的主體意向性使技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化成為可能,技術(shù)的意識(shí)形態(tài)化表現(xiàn)在技術(shù)在被特定階級(jí)或集團(tuán)制定和運(yùn)用時(shí),必然反映特定階級(jí)的世界觀和特定社會(huì)的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)形式,而于此同時(shí)技術(shù)的存在和發(fā)展也需要特定的意識(shí)形態(tài)環(huán)境來維持。技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化是人類理性分裂和階級(jí)統(tǒng)治的必然結(jié)果,它一方面促進(jìn)了社會(huì)合理化的發(fā)展,另一方面也造成了人類的生存危機(jī)。西方學(xué)者在解決這一悖論時(shí)朝著重建完整的理性方向發(fā)展,唯獨(dú)馬克思找到了變革生產(chǎn)方式這一根本路徑。我國社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)要堅(jiān)持“科學(xué)技術(shù)是第一生產(chǎn)力”的思想,以人為本,大力發(fā)展高新技術(shù),根據(jù)發(fā)展的需要引進(jìn)國外先進(jìn)技術(shù)和資本,但我們不可能同時(shí)吸收技術(shù)所帶來的西方價(jià)值觀和道德觀,只能根據(jù)我國社會(huì)主義主流意識(shí)形態(tài)對(duì)技術(shù)進(jìn)行改造和應(yīng)用。技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化是技術(shù)發(fā)展到階級(jí)社會(huì)的產(chǎn)物,技術(shù)的本質(zhì)是人的本質(zhì)的外化,在共產(chǎn)主義社會(huì)中,消滅了階級(jí)統(tǒng)治,實(shí)現(xiàn)了人的全面自由發(fā)展,技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)將會(huì)徹底的揚(yáng)棄。本文緒論主要介紹了本文選題的意義、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、研究目的和研究方法;第一章是技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化的界定,對(duì)技術(shù)和意識(shí)形態(tài)關(guān)系研究的理論基礎(chǔ)、技術(shù)的存在論差異、意識(shí)形態(tài)的歷史演變、技術(shù)的意識(shí)形態(tài)兩個(gè)維度進(jìn)行了探討;第二章分析了技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化形成的原因、技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化的合理性限度以及西方現(xiàn)代哲學(xué)破解技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)的代表性方案;第三章描述了技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化的揚(yáng)棄路徑,在社會(huì)主義主流意識(shí)形態(tài)的引導(dǎo)下,以人的自由全面發(fā)展為目的發(fā)展和控制技術(shù),共產(chǎn)主義是積極揚(yáng)棄技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)的現(xiàn)實(shí)活動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:Although the study of technological ideology arises from the criticism of the dual functions of capitalist science and technology by western scholars, technological idealization is not a unique phenomenon in capitalist society, and it may occur in any class society. In the class society of pre-capitalism, technology plays an important role in a limited range, which can not have a great impact on the society, and the ideological appearance of technology is not obvious. In the capitalist era, the ideological appearance of technology has undergone fundamental changes, and technology began to influence and regulate all fields of life, such as politics, economy, culture and so on, and technological ideology began to be gradually recognized by people. The subjective intentionality of technology makes it possible to make technological ideology possible. The ideology of technology is manifested in the fact that when technology is formulated and applied by a specific class or group, it must reflect the world outlook of a specific class and the political and economic form of a specific society. At the same time, the existence and development of technology also need a specific ideological environment to maintain. Technological ideology is the inevitable result of the rational division and class rule of human beings. On the one hand, it promotes the development of social rationalization, on the other hand, it also causes the survival crisis of human beings. In solving this paradox, western scholars are developing towards rebuilding the complete rational direction, only Marx has found the fundamental path of changing the mode of production. China's socialist modernization construction should adhere to the idea that "science and technology is the primary productive force", people-oriented, vigorously develop high and new technology, and introduce foreign advanced technology and capital according to the needs of development, but we can not absorb the western values and morality brought about by technology at the same time, and can only transform and apply technology according to the mainstream socialist ideology of our country. Technological ideology is the product of the development of technology to class society, and the essence of technology is the externalization of human nature. In the communist society, the class rule has been eliminated and the all-round and free development of human beings has been realized, and the technological ideology will be completely abandoned. The introduction of this paper mainly introduces the significance of this topic, the research status at home and abroad, research purpose and research methods. The first chapter is the definition of technology ideology, the theoretical basis of the relationship between technology and ideology, the difference of technology ontology, the historical evolution of ideology, and the ideology of technology. The second chapter analyzes the reasons for the formation of technological ideology, the reasonable limit of technological ideology and the representative scheme of western modern philosophy to crack technological ideology; the third chapter describes the sublimation path of technological ideology, under the guidance of socialist mainstream ideology, develops and controls technology for the purpose of free and all-round development of human beings, and communism is a realistic activity to actively discard technological ideology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：N02

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前6條

1 易鋒;分歧與共識(shí)：理論界如何面對(duì)[N];中國財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2006年

2 黃東黎;運(yùn)用WTO法律機(jī)制 解決中美貿(mào)易摩擦[N];法制日報(bào);2005年

3 ;以理性思維看待中醫(yī)[N];健康報(bào);2006年

4 楊雪冬;科學(xué)發(fā)展觀下的政府創(chuàng)新[N];中國社會(huì)報(bào);2009年

5 本報(bào)記者 夜譚;學(xué)術(shù)代溝是這樣形成的[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2003年

6 林賢治;歷史是不同于歷史學(xué)的[N];大眾科技報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 楊安;技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化及其揚(yáng)棄路徑研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2016年

2 周善和;技術(shù)意識(shí)形態(tài)化的局限和揚(yáng)棄路徑選擇[D];中共廣東省委黨校;2012年

3 黃龍海;論意識(shí)形態(tài)化的信息傳播[D];新疆大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2499986