本文選題：唯物史觀 + 生產(chǎn)史��； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)交流》2017年10期

【摘要】：對(duì)反映社會(huì)形態(tài)更替的一般歷史規(guī)律,和引導(dǎo)人類實(shí)踐活動(dòng)的總體文化結(jié)構(gòu),分別予以檢視,構(gòu)成了解讀馬克思唯物史觀的宏觀理論依據(jù)與微觀邏輯前提。這就要求我們?cè)讵M義的"物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)史"棱鏡中,把握廣義的"文明發(fā)展史"進(jìn)程。這當(dāng)中,涉及三個(gè)主要問題:第一,"生產(chǎn)力-生產(chǎn)關(guān)系"的辯證運(yùn)動(dòng),何以折射出歷史的全部文化圖景?第二,構(gòu)成人類文明基底的文化傳統(tǒng),怎樣在生產(chǎn)范式的更迭中保持長(zhǎng)時(shí)段的延續(xù)?第三,應(yīng)該如何理解以物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)為座架的政治-經(jīng)濟(jì)革命和以變革社會(huì)整體文化精神為旨趣的文化革命這二者之間的統(tǒng)一關(guān)系?事實(shí)上,這是剛性的物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)邏輯與彈性的文化記憶譜系這二者彼此間博弈和融合的理論兩難。它們揭示了馬克思唯物史觀在顯性的"生產(chǎn)-政治革命"和隱性的"交往-文化變遷"以及更為深刻的"記憶-精神演繹"這三個(gè)層次上的辯證統(tǒng)一。而"生產(chǎn)史-文化史-記憶史"的共軛結(jié)構(gòu),將促使歷史唯物主義的解讀范式向宏大的"精神史"領(lǐng)域躍遷。后者作為保存人類所有文明成果的記憶之場(chǎng),乃是馬克思社會(huì)批判理論得以展開的基底。憑借對(duì)人類全部精神結(jié)晶的總體性反思,馬克思唯物史觀的理論范式將發(fā)生文化-記憶學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向。
[Abstract]:The general historical law reflecting the change of social form and the overall cultural structure of guiding human practical activities are examined separately, which constitutes the macroscopic theoretical basis and microcosmic logical premise for interpreting Marx's historical materialism. This requires us to grasp the broad process of the history of civilization in the narrow sense of "history of material production" prism. There are three main questions involved: first, how does the dialectical movement of "productivity-production relations" reflect the whole cultural picture of history? Second, the cultural tradition that forms the basis of human civilization, how to maintain a long-term continuity in the change of production paradigm? Third, how should we understand the unified relationship between the political-economic revolution based on material production and the cultural revolution which aims at changing the cultural spirit of the whole society? In fact, this is a theoretical dilemma between rigid material production logic and elastic cultural memory pedigree. They reveal the dialectical unity of Marx's historical materialism on the three levels of explicit "production-political revolution", recessive "community-cultural change" and more profound "memory-spiritual deduction". The conjugate structure of "production history-culture history-memory history" will make the interpretation paradigm of historical materialism change to the grand field of "spiritual history". The latter, as the memory field of preserving all the achievements of human civilization, is the base of Marx's theory of social criticism. With the overall reflection on the spiritual crystallization of human beings, the theoretical paradigm of Marx's historical materialism will turn from culture to memory.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目“大衛(wèi)·哈維馬克思主義空間政治哲學(xué)思想研究”(17FZX036)
【分類號(hào)】：B03

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 李振綱;一位現(xiàn)代儒家的文化尋根意識(shí)——梁漱溟的東西文化比較研究評(píng)析[J];河北學(xué)刊;1990年06期

2 馬健芳;曾鷹;;從批判向度反思科技文化的焦慮[J];求索;2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1993286