本文關(guān)鍵詞： 政經(jīng)分離 政經(jīng)合一 集體經(jīng)濟 廣東南海　出處：《仲愷農(nóng)業(yè)工程學院》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：廣東省佛山市南海區(qū)的農(nóng)村土地股份合作制改革，對促進地方經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展起到了較大的作用。在政治、經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的新形勢下，農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟成為城市化進程中的絆腳石，，在經(jīng)歷了集體經(jīng)濟股份制與股權(quán)固化的改革后，“土地經(jīng)濟”發(fā)展模式使南海村莊集體經(jīng)濟的分配與管理陷入了利益群體分化的困局，不變的資產(chǎn)與變動人口形成的矛盾造成了多元利益訴求下的應(yīng)對難題，不僅束縛集體經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，而且綁架了公共服務(wù)。因此，南海積極探索村莊層面的以集體經(jīng)濟組織與自治組織脫鉤、確立公共服務(wù)為重心的“政經(jīng)分離”的社會管理新模式，推行“城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌，集約發(fā)展，政經(jīng)分離，強化服務(wù)”的改革方案，為南海社會經(jīng)濟的可持續(xù)發(fā)展奠定了重要的制度基礎(chǔ)。 針對南海農(nóng)村推行的“政經(jīng)分離”，論文深入探討和分析了“政經(jīng)分離”的背景動因、主要做法和成效、特征和模式比較，提出了新一輪農(nóng)村改革可借鑒經(jīng)驗。論文主要從以下方面進行闡述：（1）南海村居集體經(jīng)濟的由來和演變，主要介紹了南海的集體經(jīng)濟、合作經(jīng)濟、家庭聯(lián)產(chǎn)承包責任制、土地股份合作制的歷史演變。（2）南�！罢�(jīng)分離”的背景動因分析，通過對“政經(jīng)合一”的不足與弊端分析，找出“政經(jīng)分離”推行的必然性。（3）運用縱橫對比的分析方法，從南海農(nóng)村改革的新舊模式、珠三角模式、長三角模式的對比，提出南�！罢�(jīng)分離”存在的難題，并提出下一步改革思路。（4）從基層治理的整合與重構(gòu)、集體經(jīng)濟的轉(zhuǎn)型與改制、基層自治的回歸與強化、城鄉(xiāng)一體的建設(shè)與完善四個角度為農(nóng)村改革提供經(jīng)驗借鑒。 論文對廣東南海農(nóng)村“政經(jīng)分離”模式研究，分析、提煉出可行借鑒的經(jīng)驗，在理論和實踐上都有一定的價值，對集體經(jīng)濟、基層公共事務(wù)、基層公共服務(wù)、城鄉(xiāng)一體化具有推動作用。
[Abstract]:The reform of rural land stock cooperative system in Nanhai District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, has played a great role in promoting the development of local economy. Under the new situation of political and economic development, rural collective economy has become a stumbling block in the process of urbanization. After the reform of shareholding system and stock right solidification of collective economy, the development mode of "land economy" makes the distribution and management of village collective economy in the South China Sea fall into the difficulty of the differentiation of interest groups. The contradiction between the invariable assets and the formation of the changing population has resulted in a difficult problem to deal with under the demands of multiple interests, which not only constrains the development of the collective economy, but also kidnaps the public service. The South China Sea actively explores the decoupling of collective economic organizations from autonomous organizations at the village level, establishes a new social management model of "separation of politics and economy", which focuses on public services, and promotes "urban and rural planning, intensive development and separation of politics and economy." The reform scheme of strengthening service has laid an important institutional foundation for the sustainable development of social economy in the South China Sea. In view of the "political and economic separation" carried out in rural areas of the South China Sea, the paper deeply discusses and analyzes the background reasons, main methods and effects, characteristics and mode comparison of "political and economic separation". The paper introduces the origin and evolution of South China Sea village collective economy, mainly introduces the collective economy, cooperative economy and household contract responsibility system of the South China Sea. The historical evolution of the land stock cooperative system. (2) the background motivation analysis of "political and economic separation" in the South China Sea, through the analysis of the deficiency and malpractice of "political and economic integration", to find out the inevitability of the implementation of "political and economic separation", and to use the method of vertical and horizontal comparative analysis. Based on the comparison of the old and new models of rural reform in the South China Sea, the Pearl River Delta model and the Yangtze River Delta model, the paper points out the problems existing in the separation of politics and economy in the South China Sea, and puts forward the next step of reform, I. e., the integration and reconstruction of grass-roots governance. The transformation and reform of collective economy, the return and strengthening of grass-roots autonomy, and the construction and improvement of urban and rural integration provide experience for rural reform. The paper studies the mode of "separation of politics and economy" in the rural areas of Nanhai, Guangdong Province, analyzes and abstracts the experience that can be used for reference. It has certain value in theory and practice, and it is of great value to collective economy, grass-roots public affairs and grass-roots public service. The integration of urban and rural areas plays a driving role.
【學位授予單位】：仲愷農(nóng)業(yè)工程學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D422.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 郭建光;;南海:政經(jīng)分離解開農(nóng)村死結(jié)[J];村委主任;2012年16期

2 喬榛;;中國農(nóng)村改革的制度變遷理論視角追溯[J];學習與探索;2008年06期

3 羅苑龍;信息化推進城鄉(xiāng)一體化——以南海市為例[J];小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè);2002年05期

4 鄭學美;;深化農(nóng)村綜合改革與促進農(nóng)民增收——改革開放30年大理州農(nóng)民收入狀況分析[J];中共云南省委黨校學報;2009年01期

本文編號：1495594