發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-24 10:33

  本文選題：俄羅斯 + 澳大利亞　； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：自然資源作為物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)活動(dòng)的必要投入品,成為國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ),對(duì)于國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展具有不言而喻的影響力。俄羅斯和澳大利亞同為資源豐沛國(guó)家,進(jìn)入新世紀(jì)以來(lái)兩國(guó)的資源部門(mén)進(jìn)一步繁榮,成為國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)的重要組成部分。因而,資源經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r關(guān)系到兩國(guó)整體經(jīng)濟(jì)的穩(wěn)定。上世紀(jì)80年代興起的“資源詛咒”命題卻認(rèn)為,資源稟賦富足的國(guó)家之所以不能實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的長(zhǎng)久穩(wěn)定增長(zhǎng),是因?yàn)槌湓５淖匀毁Y源對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)和社會(huì)發(fā)展具有阻礙作用。這一命題一經(jīng)提出便引發(fā)了學(xué)界和政治家的廣泛關(guān)注。鑒于“資源詛咒”命題強(qiáng)調(diào)資源稟賦豐裕度與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系,本文特對(duì)這一命題的主要邏輯和理論觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了清晰的梳理。同時(shí),選取俄羅斯和澳大利亞為案例,對(duì)比分析兩國(guó)的資源稟賦及資源經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況。為更為全面的進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究,本文從“資源詛咒”命題的視角出發(fā),通過(guò)貿(mào)易狀況惡化、“荷蘭病”效應(yīng)、制度弱化以及擠出人力資本這幾個(gè)主要的引發(fā)機(jī)制,綜合評(píng)估了兩國(guó)資源經(jīng)濟(jì)模式中的優(yōu)劣所在,并深入分析了導(dǎo)致兩國(guó)呈現(xiàn)不同表現(xiàn)的背后因素。在理論總結(jié)和案例分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文就研究中發(fā)現(xiàn)的“資源詛咒”命題所具有的理論解釋力及存在的缺陷進(jìn)行分析和總結(jié),同時(shí)有針對(duì)性的提出兩國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)豐裕資源沖擊的戰(zhàn)略和政策建議。
[Abstract]:As a necessary input of material production activities, natural resources have become an important material basis for national economic development and have a self-evident influence on the development of national economy. Russia and Australia are both resource-rich countries. In the new century, the resources departments of the two countries have further flourished and become an important part of the national economy. As a result, the development of the resource economy is related to the stability of the overall economy of the two countries. However, the proposition of "resource curse" that emerged in the 1980s holds that the reason why rich countries can not achieve long-term and stable economic growth is that abundant natural resources hinder economic growth and social development. Once this proposition was put forward, it aroused the widespread concern of scholars and politicians. In view of the fact that the proposition of "resource curse" emphasizes the negative correlation between the abundance of resource endowment and economic growth, this paper makes a clear analysis of the main logical and theoretical points of view of this proposition. At the same time, taking Russia and Australia as cases, the paper compares the resource endowment and resource economy of the two countries. In order to make a more comprehensive comparative study, this paper starts from the perspective of "resource curse" proposition, through the deterioration of the trade situation, the "Dutch disease" effect, the weakening of the system and the extrusion of human capital. The advantages and disadvantages of the two countries' resource economy models are comprehensively evaluated, and the factors behind the two countries' different performance are analyzed in depth. On the basis of theoretical summary and case analysis, this paper analyzes and summarizes the theoretical explanatory power and defects of the "resource curse" proposition found in the research. At the same time, the two countries targeted to deal with the impact of abundant resources strategy and policy recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F151.2;F161.1;F205

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 唐海燕;世界政治經(jīng)濟(jì)和貿(mào)易的中心強(qiáng)國(guó)——澳大利亞的未來(lái)[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年02期

2 馮宗憲;于璐瑤;俞煒華;;資源詛咒的警示與西部資源開(kāi)發(fā)難題的破解[J];西安交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 ;[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

2 華東師范大學(xué)國(guó)際關(guān)系與地區(qū)發(fā)展研究院院長(zhǎng) 馮紹雷;[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1928736