本文關(guān)鍵詞： 政府債務(wù)危機(jī) 定量寬松 策略　出處：《山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：政府債務(wù)曾經(jīng)被認(rèn)為是最安全的債務(wù)，但政府債務(wù)信用危機(jī)將導(dǎo)致世界資金流向發(fā)生變化，不僅影響歐美自身還波及了新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體。債務(wù)危機(jī)像慢性發(fā)展的惡性“腫瘤”，侵蝕著尚未全面復(fù)蘇的全球經(jīng)濟(jì)。 目前，歐美采取的應(yīng)對(duì)策略并不完美，歐洲經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇不明朗，美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)前景向好的趨勢(shì)不是很明顯，因此歐美債務(wù)危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)策略的探討對(duì)政策導(dǎo)向?qū)⒂泻艽蟮膮⒖純r(jià)值。債務(wù)危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)措施的學(xué)術(shù)研究還停留在簡(jiǎn)單的對(duì)比層面，并沒有對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)措施效果進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)，更沒有指出應(yīng)對(duì)措施效果甚微的深層原因以及提出更完善的應(yīng)對(duì)方案。本文旨在運(yùn)用比較分析方法，對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)措施的相關(guān)工具進(jìn)行分析，，并在一定的體制背景下根據(jù)救助的實(shí)際效果指出其中存在的缺陷，并提出可行的歐洲債券形式。 本文包括五部分，首先分析債務(wù)危機(jī)發(fā)生的背景及本文撰寫的意義，簡(jiǎn)要介紹了文章的結(jié)構(gòu)框架；其次對(duì)歐美債務(wù)危機(jī)相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行分析，簡(jiǎn)要介紹債務(wù)和債務(wù)危機(jī)的轉(zhuǎn)化及債務(wù)危機(jī)的發(fā)展，并提出本文的理論基礎(chǔ)；第三部分對(duì)歐美債務(wù)危機(jī)形成機(jī)理進(jìn)行比較分析，按照原因的主次一一陳述并作比較，為后文的應(yīng)對(duì)策略做鋪墊；第四部分是本文的重點(diǎn)，為更好地說明歐美應(yīng)對(duì)措施的不同，本章先是闡述歐洲債務(wù)和美國(guó)債務(wù)的區(qū)別，然后對(duì)歐美應(yīng)對(duì)效果進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)，包括歐美各國(guó)自身的經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇，還包括歐美債務(wù)對(duì)世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響；最后一章是關(guān)于完善歐美債務(wù)危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)措施的對(duì)策建議。同時(shí)該部分提出歐洲債券發(fā)行方式的“修正版布雷迪計(jì)劃”。
[Abstract]:Government debt was once considered the safest debt, but the credit crisis of government debt will lead to a change in world capital flows. The debt crisis, like a malignant "tumor" of chronic development, is eroding a global economy that has not yet fully recovered. At present, the European and American response strategy is not perfect, Europe's economic recovery is not clear, the U. S. economic outlook for the trend is not very clear. Therefore, the discussion of the coping strategies of debt crisis in Europe and the United States will be of great reference value to the policy direction. The academic research on debt crisis response measures remains at a simple comparative level, and there is no evaluation of the effectiveness of the response measures. Moreover, it does not point out the deep reasons for the little effect of response measures and put forward a more perfect response plan. This paper aims to use comparative analysis method to analyze the relevant tools of response measures. In a certain institutional background, the defects are pointed out according to the actual effect of the rescue, and a feasible European bond form is put forward. This paper consists of five parts. Firstly, it analyzes the background of debt crisis and the significance of this paper, and briefly introduces the structure of the article. Secondly, the related concepts of debt crisis in Europe and the United States are analyzed, the transformation of debt and debt crisis and the development of debt crisis are briefly introduced, and the theoretical basis of this paper is put forward. The third part makes a comparative analysis of the formation mechanism of the debt crisis in Europe and the United States. The 4th part is the focus of this paper. In order to better explain the differences of European and American response measures, this chapter first elaborates the difference between European debt and American debt, and then evaluates the response effect of Europe and the United States. Including the European and American countries' own economic recovery, but also includes the impact of European and American debt on the world economy; The last chapter is about how to improve the response to the debt crisis in Europe and the United States. At the same time, it proposes the revised Brady Plan of Eurobond issuance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F815;F817.12;F831.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐杰華;;歐元危機(jī)的成因分析及其影響[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年14期

2 秦?zé)?陳學(xué)彬;;歐美債務(wù)危機(jī)對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2012年04期

3 蔡彤娟;黃瑞剛;;歐元區(qū)主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的治理方案分析[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2010年09期

4 陳藝云;鄭少賢;;歐元區(qū)主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的原因、影響及啟示[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2010年09期

5 羅奕;;歐債危機(jī)的演進(jìn)、成因及應(yīng)對(duì)措施[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2013年01期

6 徐英東;;希臘債務(wù)危機(jī)的成因及IMF救助方案對(duì)希臘的影響[J];中國(guó)城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年30期

7 郝宇彪;;歐元區(qū)主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)爆發(fā)的原因及影響[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2010年12期

8 張斌;王勛;華秀萍;;中國(guó)外匯儲(chǔ)備的名義收益率和真實(shí)收益率[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年10期

9 管清友;;歐洲主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)的根源[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2010年20期

10 梁勤星;王大波;;當(dāng)前世界主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)及其啟示[J];西南金融;2010年07期

本文編號(hào)：1489076