本文選題：中間品　切入點(diǎn)：區(qū)別定價(jià)　出處：《財(cái)貿(mào)研究》2017年07期

【摘要】：在最終產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)需求不確定以及下游差異化產(chǎn)品的框架下,對(duì)需求波動(dòng)情形不同以及不同需求情形對(duì)應(yīng)概率不同時(shí)區(qū)別定價(jià)和統(tǒng)一定價(jià)策略下的社會(huì)總福利進(jìn)行比較,并運(yùn)用理論分析的結(jié)論對(duì)Intel反壟斷案進(jìn)行評(píng)析,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出相應(yīng)的反壟斷建議。研究認(rèn)為,中國《反壟斷法》在對(duì)中間品區(qū)別定價(jià)行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制時(shí)應(yīng)以社會(huì)總福利作為落腳點(diǎn),不僅要對(duì)不同需求情形進(jìn)行區(qū)分,而且還應(yīng)結(jié)合需求波動(dòng)性測(cè)度和產(chǎn)品差異化程度來適當(dāng)增加適用除外原則。
[Abstract]:In the framework of the final product market demand uncertainty and lower differentiated products, the demand for different situations and different demand fluctuation and corresponding probability difference pricing and uniform pricing strategy under the total social welfare were compared, and using the conclusion of theoretical analysis on Intel antitrust case, on the basis of the corresponding counter monopoly advice. Research shows that Chinese < antitrust regulation in > of intermediate difference pricing behavior should be based on the total social welfare as the goal, not only to distinguish between different needs, but also should be combined with the degree of demand volatility measure and product differentiation to appropriately increase the exception principle.

【作者單位】： 湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“中間投入品價(jià)格歧視的反壟斷規(guī)制研究”(15CJY001) 湖南省社科基金項(xiàng)目“反壟斷經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視野下中間品市場(chǎng)區(qū)別定價(jià)研究”(14YBA203) 湖南省社科成果評(píng)審委員會(huì)課題“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用與反壟斷規(guī)制——基于產(chǎn)業(yè)組織理論視角的理論與實(shí)證”(XSP17YBZC086)
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;F274
，

本文編號(hào)：1687219