發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-15 01:09

  本文選題：股權(quán)眾籌 + 投資者保護(hù)　； 參考：《廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：股權(quán)眾籌在我國(guó)是一個(gè)比較新的詞匯,是從美國(guó)引入的一個(gè)舶來(lái)品。對(duì)小微型企業(yè)來(lái)說(shuō),此種低成本、高效率的融資方式吸引力極大;對(duì)投資者來(lái)說(shuō),選擇股權(quán)投資,具有低門檻、高收益的優(yōu)點(diǎn)。在股權(quán)眾籌中,投資者所面臨風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的程度和投資者自身所采取的運(yùn)作模式以及其自身的條件存在緊密聯(lián)系,在沒(méi)有外界因素的影響下,投資者為了追求低交易成本,僅僅從短期利益來(lái)考慮,導(dǎo)致沒(méi)有采取足夠的保護(hù)措施。在如許的大背景下,創(chuàng)制投資者保護(hù)規(guī)制成為股權(quán)眾籌能夠在我國(guó)康健、長(zhǎng)久成長(zhǎng)下去的關(guān)鍵。從當(dāng)前的研究情況看來(lái),法學(xué)各界對(duì)這方面的關(guān)注并不多,大部分研究都是針對(duì)股權(quán)眾籌的正當(dāng)性問(wèn)題。但是研究過(guò)程中均沒(méi)有重視對(duì)投資者保護(hù)。當(dāng)然,鐘維等少數(shù)學(xué)者在研究過(guò)程中,對(duì)于投資者利益的保護(hù)作了研究,并且指出要將這一部分納入到立法范疇,但是他們的研究均是以照搬國(guó)外的立法居多,沒(méi)有結(jié)合我國(guó)的具體實(shí)際。綜上,在研究過(guò)程中,以投資者保護(hù)作為進(jìn)入點(diǎn),對(duì)股權(quán)眾籌的法律建構(gòu)作了分析研究,力爭(zhēng)創(chuàng)設(shè)對(duì)投資者利好的發(fā)展氛圍。此外,本篇文章還對(duì)海外的相關(guān)立法情況作了較為周全的分析,而且結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí),提出了完善投資者保護(hù)的立法路徑。起首,對(duì)我國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌的成長(zhǎng)近況做了說(shuō)明,明確其對(duì)于促進(jìn)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展所能夠施展的作用。說(shuō)明了對(duì)投資者利益保護(hù)的重要性以及現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)在對(duì)投資者利益保護(hù)方面的法令缺失;再次,本文對(duì)美國(guó)和英國(guó)等在相關(guān)方面的立法情況進(jìn)行了分析和介紹,并總結(jié)出經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn);最后,聯(lián)系我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí),有針對(duì)性的提出了股權(quán)眾籌投資者法律保護(hù)的具體機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Crowdfunding is a relatively new term in our country, and it is an imported product from the United States. For small and micro enterprises, this kind of low cost, high efficiency financing is attractive; for investors, the choice of equity investment has the advantages of low threshold and high return. In stock raising, the degree of risk faced by investors is closely related to the mode of operation adopted by investors themselves and their own conditions. Under the influence of no external factors, investors pursue low transaction costs. Only considering the short-term benefits leads to inadequate protection measures. In such a background, the creation of investor protection regulations become the key to the healthy and long-term growth of stock rights crowdfunding in China. From the current research situation, the law community pays little attention to this aspect, most of the research is aimed at the legitimacy of stock raising. However, in the process of research, no attention has been paid to the protection of investors. Of course, a few scholars, such as Zhong Wei, have studied the protection of investors' interests in the course of their research, and pointed out that they should bring this part into the scope of legislation, but most of their studies are based on copying the legislation of foreign countries. It has not combined with the concrete reality of our country. In summary, in the research process, taking the investor protection as the entry point, this paper analyzes and studies the legal construction of the stock rights crowdfunding, and strives to create a favorable development atmosphere for the investors. In addition, this article also makes a comprehensive analysis of the overseas legislation, and puts forward the legislative path to perfect investor protection combining with the reality of our country. Firstly, it explains the recent development of stock rights raising in China, and clarifies its role in promoting the economic development of our country. It explains the importance of the protection of investors' interests and the lack of legislation on the protection of investors' interests in our country at the present stage. Thirdly, this paper analyzes and introduces the relevant legislation of the United States and the United Kingdom. Finally, according to the reality of our country, the author puts forward the specific mechanism of legal protection of stock rights investors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳晨;;股權(quán)眾籌投資者適當(dāng)性制度研究[J];上海金融;2016年10期

2 李華;;我國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌投資者權(quán)益保護(hù)機(jī)制之完善[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年09期

3 朱紹綱;;股權(quán)眾籌投資者保護(hù):融資方的監(jiān)管與合格投資者制度的博弈[J];時(shí)代金融;2016年23期

4 馬永保;;股權(quán)眾籌行業(yè)融資信息披露制度:行業(yè)特殊性與發(fā)展方向[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2016年08期

5 彭紅楓;趙海燕;;基于新監(jiān)管框架的中國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌的“熱發(fā)展”與“冷思考”[J];金融發(fā)展研究;2016年07期

6 馬其家;樊富強(qiáng);;我國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌領(lǐng)投融資法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2016年09期

7 張宏婧;王潔;;股權(quán)眾籌平臺(tái)的內(nèi)部控制與外部監(jiān)管——基于投資者保護(hù)視角的探討[J];南方金融;2016年07期

8 袁木玲;;我國(guó)眾籌的法律問(wèn)題探究[J];商;2016年26期

9 閆夏秋;;股權(quán)眾籌合格投資者制度立法理念矯正與法律進(jìn)路[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2016年04期

10 張繼紅;吳濤;;歐洲股權(quán)眾籌投資者適當(dāng)性制度之比較研究[J];證券法苑;2015年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 雷華順;眾籌融資法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 魯寧;論股權(quán)眾籌的的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與規(guī)制[D];南京大學(xué);2016年

2 劉于良;論我國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌合法化的困局及出路[D];中央民族大學(xué);2016年

3 成琳;論中國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌平臺(tái)的法律規(guī)制[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

4 梁福歡;我國(guó)股權(quán)眾籌監(jiān)管制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1890286