【摘要】： 隨著我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,民主政治制度的不斷完善,公眾對政府的要求越來越高,對政府在某些工作方面的不足質(zhì)疑聲此起彼伏。國家審計(jì)署已連續(xù)多年掀起“審計(jì)風(fēng)暴”,審計(jì)成為公眾了解和監(jiān)督政府的一個窗口。政府也越來越意識到了審計(jì)的重要性,審計(jì)也成為政府改進(jìn)自身建設(shè)的一個手段。國務(wù)院對審計(jì)署查出的問題,責(zé)成相關(guān)部門整改,提高了政府工作效率,同時也贏得了公眾信任。如何更好的發(fā)揮審計(jì)的作用,如何更好的使審計(jì)充當(dāng)起公眾和政府彼此信任的橋梁,進(jìn)一步作好政府績效審計(jì)工作成為亟待解決的課題。 本文依據(jù)委托代理理論、博弈論的方法,對委托人和代理人之間關(guān)系,運(yùn)用博弈理論進(jìn)行了分析,堅(jiān)持理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際、實(shí)證分析和規(guī)范分析相統(tǒng)一的研究方法,立足于我國政府審計(jì)工作實(shí)際,借鑒國外的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),盡可能用全新的視角審視和研究我國現(xiàn)階段行政府績效審計(jì)的理論和實(shí)踐問題。本文第一章在簡單介紹研究背景基礎(chǔ)上,明確本文所要研究的問題,并對相關(guān)概念、研究思路、研究方法、本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)和不足進(jìn)行簡要說明。第二章闡述政府績效審計(jì)的一般問題,對概念內(nèi)涵、與違規(guī)審計(jì)的區(qū)別、當(dāng)前目標(biāo)以及政府績效審計(jì)涉及的主體進(jìn)行了論述。第三章著重闡述了西方及我國政府績效審計(jì)的發(fā)展過程。第四章分析政府績效審計(jì)中的委托代理關(guān)系,詳細(xì)論述委托代理理論概念同時,重點(diǎn)分析了委托代理關(guān)系是政府績效審計(jì)產(chǎn)生發(fā)展的根源、政府績效審計(jì)中委托代理關(guān)系的層次分析以及政府績效審計(jì)歸屬關(guān)系。第五章對博弈分析在政府績效審計(jì)中的作用進(jìn)行了闡述,利用博弈理論對不同主體的博弈過程的分析。第六章通過用委托代理理論及博弈理論對政府績效審計(jì)的分析,得出促進(jìn)政府績效審計(jì)健康發(fā)展必須推進(jìn)公開、透明機(jī)制的建立。第七章利用上面的理論分引出討論確�？冃徲�(jì)的評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題。第八章對政府績效審計(jì)發(fā)展進(jìn)行展望,提出積極推進(jìn)公開透明機(jī)制的運(yùn)行和增強(qiáng)審計(jì)獨(dú)立性的建議。 創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)和不足。本文對政府績效審計(jì)涉及的各方主體關(guān)系,應(yīng)用委托代理理論進(jìn)行的詳盡的分析論述,這是以往文獻(xiàn)中沒有過的:應(yīng)用博弈論的觀點(diǎn),對委托代理關(guān)系中不同博弈主體的博弈過程進(jìn)行分析,從獨(dú)特的視角闡述了政府績效審計(jì)的必然;對審計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)做了深入系統(tǒng)的探討。但是,在例證某些事項(xiàng)時,有時并不十分充分:審計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模式的建立也是比較粗淺的
[Abstract]:With the development of the socialist market economy and the continuous improvement of the democratic political system, the public demands the government more and more, and the lack of the government in some aspects has been questioned one after another. The National Audit Office has set off a "auditing storm" for many years, and audit has become a window for the public to understand and supervise the government. The government is becoming more and more aware of the importance of auditing, which has become a means for the government to improve its own construction. The State Council has ordered the relevant departments to rectify the problems identified by the Audit Office, thus improving the efficiency of the government and winning public trust. How to better play the role of audit, how to better make the audit as a bridge of trust between the public and the government, further better government performance audit work has become an urgent task to be solved. Based on the principal-agent theory and game theory, this paper analyzes the relationship between the principal and the agent by using the game theory, insists on the unified research method of integrating theory with practice, empirical analysis and normative analysis. Based on the practice of government audit in our country and drawing on the advanced experience of foreign countries, this paper tries to examine and study the theory and practice of government performance audit in our country from a new angle of view as far as possible. In the first chapter, on the basis of a brief introduction of the research background, the problems to be studied in this paper are clarified, and the related concepts, research ideas, research methods, innovations and shortcomings of this paper are briefly explained. The second chapter expounds the general problems of the government performance audit, discusses the connotation of the concept, the difference between the government performance audit and the illegal audit, the current goal and the main body involved in the government performance audit. The third chapter focuses on the development process of government performance audit in western and China. The fourth chapter analyzes the principal-agent relationship in government performance audit, and discusses the concept of principal-agent theory in detail. At the same time, it analyzes the principal-agent relationship is the root of the development of government performance audit. The hierarchical analysis of principal-agent relationship in government performance audit and the ownership relationship of government performance audit. The fifth chapter expounds the role of game analysis in government performance audit and analyzes the game process of different subjects by using game theory. The sixth chapter analyzes the government performance audit by using the principal-agent theory and the game theory, and draws the conclusion that to promote the healthy development of the government performance audit, we must promote the establishment of open and transparent mechanism. The seventh chapter discusses the evaluation standard of performance audit by using the above theory. The eighth chapter looks forward to the development of government performance audit, and puts forward some suggestions to promote the operation of open and transparent mechanism and enhance the independence of audit. Innovation points and shortcomings. In this paper, the relationship between the parties involved in the government performance audit, the application of principal-agent theory to the detailed analysis and discussion, this is not in previous literature: apply the point of view of game theory, This paper analyzes the game process of different game players in the principal-agent relationship, and expounds the necessity of government performance audit from a unique angle of view. The audit standard is discussed systematically. However, when illustrating certain matters, it is sometimes not quite sufficient: the establishment of the auditing standard model is also relatively superficial.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：F239.44

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳秀鳳;我國加入WTO后開展績效審計(jì)的必要性[J];中國審計(jì);2002年09期

2 滕世華;;公共治理理論及其引發(fā)的變革[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

3 蔡立輝;西方國家政府績效評估的理念及其啟示[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

4 張嬈;淺析國有資本金績效評價(jià)新體系[J];上海會計(jì);2003年02期

5 石愛中;國家審計(jì)的政治思維[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年06期

6 張進(jìn);澳大利亞績效審計(jì)的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年06期

7 李哲;第二講 政府績效審計(jì)要素[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1998年02期

8 俞蘇;試論我國開展政府績效審計(jì)的可行性[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1998年06期

9 張繼勛;國外政府績效審計(jì)及其啟示[J];審計(jì)研究;2000年01期

10 雷達(dá);新公共管理對績效審計(jì)的影響及對我國績效審計(jì)發(fā)展的啟示[J];審計(jì)研究;2004年02期

，

本文編號：2367228