本文選題：工業(yè)地價(jià) + 產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)��； 參考：《資源科學(xué)》2017年04期

【摘要】：土地既是產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)載體又是空間約束,其各種功能支撐著產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的不斷演進(jìn),而產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷又型塑了土地要素的市場(chǎng)需求。因此,工業(yè)地價(jià)變動(dòng)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷聯(lián)系密切,對(duì)二者關(guān)系的研究對(duì)推動(dòng)土地市場(chǎng)化改革和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)有積極的意義。本文利用2007-2013年中國(guó)的工業(yè)用地出讓數(shù)據(jù),通過(guò)建立工業(yè)地價(jià)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的PVAR模型,分析了中國(guó)東、中、西部三個(gè)不同地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與工業(yè)地價(jià)變動(dòng)之間的互動(dòng)效應(yīng)。實(shí)證分析結(jié)果表明,工業(yè)地價(jià)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷之間能夠同向協(xié)調(diào)、互相促進(jìn),但與此同時(shí)卻也存在較大的地區(qū)性差異:①在東部地區(qū),由于市場(chǎng)化水平較高,工業(yè)地價(jià)上漲與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化的方向具有同一性;②在中部地區(qū),工業(yè)地價(jià)上漲與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)之間形成了同向變動(dòng)的良性互動(dòng),但是過(guò)高的工業(yè)地價(jià)并不利于地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化;③在西部地區(qū),工業(yè)地價(jià)變動(dòng)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的互動(dòng)效應(yīng)較弱,而且呈現(xiàn)出地價(jià)上漲不利于結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)和結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化的趨勢(shì)。工業(yè)地價(jià)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷互動(dòng)效應(yīng)的地區(qū)性差異,來(lái)源于地區(qū)之間在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平與土地市場(chǎng)化進(jìn)程方面存在的顯著差異。因此針對(duì)實(shí)證結(jié)果,本研究提出以下政策建議:東部地區(qū),應(yīng)繼續(xù)深化土地市場(chǎng)化改革以促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷;中部地區(qū),應(yīng)協(xié)調(diào)土地市場(chǎng)化與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的關(guān)系,適度對(duì)高地價(jià)進(jìn)行調(diào)控;西部地區(qū),則需要大力推進(jìn)土地市場(chǎng)化改革然后再考慮對(duì)地價(jià)的調(diào)控。
[Abstract]:Land is not only the basic carrier of industrial development, but also the spatial constraint. Its various functions support the continuous evolution of industrial structure, and the changes of industrial structure shape the market demand of land elements. Therefore, the change of industrial land price is closely related to the change of industrial structure, and the study of the relationship between them has positive significance to promote the reform of land marketization and the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure. Based on the data of industrial land transfer in China from 2007 to 2013, this paper analyzes the interactive effects between industrial structure change and industrial land price change in three different regions of China by establishing the PVAR model of industrial land price and industrial structure change. The results of empirical analysis show that industrial land price and industrial structure change can coordinate and promote each other in the same direction, but at the same time there is a big regional difference: 1 in the eastern region, because of the high level of marketization. Industrial land price rising and industrial structure upgrading, the direction of industrial structure optimization is identical. In the central region, the rise of industrial land price and the upgrading of industrial structure have formed a positive interaction in the same direction. However, excessive industrial land price is not conducive to the optimization of regional industrial structure. In the western region, the interactive effect between the change of industrial land price and the change of industrial structure is weak, and the rise of land price is not conducive to structural upgrading and structural optimization. The regional difference between industrial land price and the interactive effect of industrial structure change originates from the significant differences between regions in the level of economic development and the process of land marketization. Therefore, based on the empirical results, this study puts forward the following policy recommendations: in the eastern region, we should continue to deepen the reform of land marketization in order to promote the changes of industrial structure, and in the central region, we should coordinate the relationship between land marketization and industrial structural changes. In the western region, it is necessary to push forward the reform of land marketization and then consider the regulation of land price.
【作者單位】： 南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(71273133) 2016年度江蘇省普通高校學(xué)術(shù)學(xué)位研究生科研創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(KYZZ16_0371)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F121.3;F301

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張平;張鵬鵬;;房?jī)r(jià)、勞動(dòng)力異質(zhì)性與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2016年02期

2 趙愛(ài)棟;馬賢磊;曲福田;許實(shí);;基于資源價(jià)值顯化視角的中國(guó)工業(yè)用地市場(chǎng)發(fā)育水平及其影響因素[J];資源科學(xué);2016年02期

3 藏波;呂萍;趙松;;中國(guó)園區(qū)建設(shè)中的工業(yè)地價(jià)、產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)及其地區(qū)差異:城市層面的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展雁行模型[J];中國(guó)土地科學(xué);2015年08期

4 李志翠;徐波;卞亞斌;;城市化、土地價(jià)格與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整——基于面板VAR模型的研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2015年06期

5 谷卿德;石薇;王洪衛(wèi);;房地產(chǎn)價(jià)格上漲對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)的影響探析——基于中國(guó)257個(gè)城市的實(shí)證研究[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2015年02期

6 韓劍;鄭秋玲;;政府干預(yù)如何導(dǎo)致地區(qū)資源錯(cuò)配——基于行業(yè)內(nèi)和行業(yè)間錯(cuò)配的分解[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年11期

7 楚建群;許超詣;劉云中;;論城市工業(yè)用地“低價(jià)”出讓的動(dòng)機(jī)和收益[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2014年05期

8 王s，

本文編號(hào)：1944136