本文選題：碳強(qiáng)度規(guī)制 + 碳稅規(guī)制　； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：處于工業(yè)化階段的中國，高碳排放問題自然不可避免。全球低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)的盛行使該問題棘手難解，甚至可以說直接向我國傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式提出挑戰(zhàn)，低碳規(guī)制自然成為問題解決的突破口。一國（或地區(qū)）經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的驅(qū)動(dòng)力主要來自三個(gè)方面：消費(fèi)、投資和出口，而產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力是出口的重要決定因素。擺在我們面前的問題是：低碳規(guī)制對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力是否有影響？有何影響？這種影響在中國能否得到驗(yàn)證？若是，在眾多常見的低碳規(guī)制政策中，哪一種是中國產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力發(fā)展的最優(yōu)選擇？ 本文將低碳規(guī)制分成當(dāng)前學(xué)術(shù)界普遍關(guān)注的數(shù)量上的碳強(qiáng)度規(guī)制和價(jià)格上的碳稅規(guī)制及碳出口稅規(guī)制。首先理論分析低碳規(guī)制對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響，發(fā)現(xiàn)低碳規(guī)制與產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力之間可能呈U型關(guān)系：在一定的規(guī)制強(qiáng)度閾值內(nèi)，該三種低碳規(guī)制均會(huì)通過不同途徑阻礙產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力形成；當(dāng)超出該閾值后，上述關(guān)系可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)逆轉(zhuǎn)，即較高強(qiáng)度的低碳規(guī)制可能會(huì)促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的形成。其次描述性分析現(xiàn)階段低碳規(guī)制對(duì)中國產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的關(guān)系，發(fā)現(xiàn)三種低碳規(guī)制對(duì)中國產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力均存在不同程度的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系，但兩者之間可能存在的U型關(guān)系尚且未知。第三通過實(shí)證分析進(jìn)一步證實(shí)描述性分析的結(jié)論，另外還發(fā)現(xiàn)三種低碳規(guī)制對(duì)中國產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的U型關(guān)系是存在的，但目前這種關(guān)系尚處于U型左端，，呈負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系。縱向來看，這種負(fù)相關(guān)程度在碳強(qiáng)度規(guī)制、碳稅規(guī)制及碳出口稅規(guī)制三種模型中逐次減弱，橫向來看，這種負(fù)相關(guān)程度隨著低碳規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的增強(qiáng)而減弱，即若以經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)為中心，選擇以碳出口稅規(guī)制為主要低碳規(guī)制乃為最優(yōu)選擇。
[Abstract]:In the industrial stage of China, the problem of high carbon emissions is inevitable. The prevalence of the global low-carbon economy makes the problem difficult to solve, and can even be said to directly challenge the traditional economic development model of our country. Low-carbon regulation naturally becomes the breakthrough to solve the problem. The driving force of a country's economic growth mainly comes from three aspects: consumption, investment and export, and the international competitiveness of industry is an important determinant of export. The question before us is: does low-carbon regulation have an impact on the international competitiveness of the industry? What's the impact? Can this effect be tested in China? If so, which of the many common low-carbon regulatory policies is the best choice for the development of international competitiveness of Chinese industry? This paper divides low-carbon regulation into quantitative carbon intensity regulation, price carbon tax regulation and carbon export tax regulation. First of all, the influence of low-carbon regulation on the international competitiveness of industry is analyzed theoretically, and it is found that the relationship between low-carbon regulation and industrial international competitiveness may be U-shaped: within a certain threshold of regulatory intensity. The three kinds of low-carbon regulation will hinder the formation of industrial international competitiveness through different ways, and when the threshold is exceeded, the above relationship may be reversed, that is, the higher intensity of low-carbon regulation may promote the formation of industrial international competitiveness. Secondly, the paper analyzes the relationship between low-carbon regulation and international competitiveness of Chinese industry at present, and finds that the three kinds of low-carbon regulation have negative correlation to the international competitiveness of Chinese industry to varying degrees. However, the possible U-type relationship between the two is unknown. Thirdly, the conclusion of descriptive analysis is further confirmed by empirical analysis. In addition, it is found that there is a U-type relationship between three kinds of low-carbon regulation on the international competitiveness of Chinese industry, but at present this relationship is still at the left end of U-type, which is negatively related. Vertically, the degree of negative correlation is weakened in three models: carbon intensity regulation, carbon tax regulation and carbon export tax regulation. Horizontally, the negative correlation degree weakens with the increase of low carbon regulation intensity. That is, if economic growth is the center, the choice of carbon export tax regulation as the main low carbon regulation is the best choice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F121.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊嶸;中國石油產(chǎn)業(yè)市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2002年04期

2 沈可挺;李鋼;;碳關(guān)稅對(duì)中國工業(yè)品出口的影響——基于可計(jì)算一般均衡模型的評(píng)估[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年01期

3 俞海山;鄭凌燕;;碳關(guān)稅的合規(guī)性及合理性分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年12期

4 賈根良,張峰;傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力與地方化生產(chǎn)體系[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2001年09期

5 金碚;李鋼;陳志;;加入WTO以來中國制造業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的實(shí)證分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年10期

6 劉林青;譚力文;;產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的二維評(píng)價(jià)——全球價(jià)值鏈背景下的思考[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年12期

7 沈可挺;;碳關(guān)稅爭(zhēng)端及其對(duì)中國制造業(yè)的影響[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年01期

8 陳立敏;侯再平;;融入技術(shù)附加值的國際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)方法——基于電子通訊設(shè)備產(chǎn)業(yè)的實(shí)證分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年03期

9 李平;李淑云;沈得芳;;碳關(guān)稅問題研究:背景、征收標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及應(yīng)對(duì)措施[J];國際金融研究;2010年09期

10 黃凌云;李星;;美國擬征收碳關(guān)稅對(duì)我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響——基于GTAP模型的實(shí)證分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2010年11期

本文編號(hào)：1795812