生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、互補(bǔ)效應(yīng)與居民消費(fèi)
本文關(guān)鍵詞:生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、互補(bǔ)效應(yīng)與居民消費(fèi) 出處:《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施 發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀 比較 互補(bǔ)效應(yīng) 居民消費(fèi)
【摘要】:近年來居民儲(chǔ)蓄率的高位維持及歐美國家在2008年遭受金融危機(jī)后,進(jìn)口需求的疲軟;還有這兩年固定資產(chǎn)投資過度引發(fā)諸多不良后果導(dǎo)致我國轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長方式的欲求越來越迫切。作為“三駕馬車”之一的消費(fèi),對(duì)其的擴(kuò)大成為了解決上述問題的關(guān)鍵,基于這一現(xiàn)實(shí)背景,本文對(duì)作為擴(kuò)大居民消費(fèi)能力影響密切的消費(fèi)環(huán)境因素中生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施部分進(jìn)行了相應(yīng)研究。 由于同居民耐用品消費(fèi)存在緊密的互補(bǔ)性關(guān)系,各類生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的好壞、供給水平的高低直接影響到相關(guān)商品的需求和相應(yīng)消費(fèi)支出的變動(dòng)。盡管已存在不少對(duì)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和居民消費(fèi)間關(guān)系的研究,但多數(shù)都僅從經(jīng)典宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)增長模型入手,考慮了基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施作為投資的一部分對(duì)最終產(chǎn)出,進(jìn)而間接對(duì)居民消費(fèi)可能產(chǎn)生的擠入和擠出效應(yīng),忽略互補(bǔ)性這一直接作用渠道。正因如此,以往文獻(xiàn)所揭示的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施與居民消費(fèi)支出間的關(guān)系存在某種程度上不全面、不準(zhǔn)確的問題。 結(jié)合近十年來我國各省市不同類型生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施發(fā)展水平的代理指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù),文章應(yīng)用隨機(jī)系數(shù)計(jì)量方法從互補(bǔ)性渠道檢驗(yàn)了不同省份不同類型生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施對(duì)居民耐用品消費(fèi)的定量影響。結(jié)果顯示出東中西部地區(qū)以及各個(gè)省市的生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給差異對(duì)居民的耐用品消費(fèi)產(chǎn)生了不同程度、方向的作用。上述工作從某種意義上修正了已有研究的缺陷,更精確的測算出兩者間的實(shí)際關(guān)系。 除此之外,在運(yùn)用指標(biāo)構(gòu)建、統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)描述等方式對(duì)我國各類生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的發(fā)展水平進(jìn)行國內(nèi)外分析、比較后,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)供水、供電等類型在國際上處于相對(duì)領(lǐng)先的位置,其余類型則較為滯后;東中西部地區(qū)的生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施發(fā)展水平存在較大差距,尤其體現(xiàn)在電力、通信方面。 綜上所述,為不同地區(qū)生活基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的發(fā)展側(cè)重提供借鑒,為縮減區(qū)域間居民消費(fèi)能力的差異、促進(jìn)整體消費(fèi)水平的提升提供參考是本文的主要貢獻(xiàn)所在。
[Abstract]:In recent years, household savings rate remain high and the European and American countries suffered in the 2008 financial crisis, weak import demand; and the two years of excessive investment in fixed assets caused many adverse consequences resulting in China's transformation of the mode of economic growth needs more and more urgent. As the "three horse car" of the expansion of consumption, become aware of the key to solve these problems, based on the realistic background, this paper researched on as the expansion of consumer ability to influence the life infrastructure close consumption environment.
Because the residents of durable goods are complementary to the close relationship between the development of infrastructure, life quality, supply will directly affect the level of the relevant commodity demand and corresponding consumer spending changes. Although there are a lot of research has been on infrastructure and consumer relations, but most of them only from the classical macro economic growth the model of the infrastructure investment as a part of the final output, and thus indirectly to consumption possible squeeze and crowding out effect, the direct effect of ignoring complementary channels. Therefore, the relationship between the literature reveals the infrastructure and consumer spending between different extent the problem of inaccurate.
Combined with the proxy data level of our country's various provinces and cities of different types of infrastructure development in recent ten years, the application of measurement methods of random coefficient test quantitatively the influence of different provinces and different types of living infrastructure supplies consumption on the resistance of residents from the complementary channels. The results show that the Eastern and western regions and infrastructure supply in various provinces and cities differences in consumption of durable goods to the residents have different degree of effect. The direction of fixed defects of existing research in the sense that more accurately calculated between the actual relationship.
In addition, in the use of indicators, domestic statistics to describe the way of life in our country infrastructure development level analysis, comparison, we found that the water supply, power supply and other types of relatively in the leading position in the world, the other type is relatively lag behind; there is a big gap between the Eastern and western regions of the living infrastructure the level of development, especially in electric power, communication and so on.
To sum up, we should provide references for the development of the living infrastructure in different regions, and provide references for reducing the differences between the residents' consumption ability and promoting the overall consumption level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F299.24;F126.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張書云;周凌瑤;;公共物品供給對(duì)農(nóng)村居民消費(fèi)影響的實(shí)證分析——基于農(nóng)村面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期
2 張秀蓮;王凱;;我國農(nóng)村基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投入?yún)^(qū)域差異分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2012年03期
3 張學(xué)良;;中國交通基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的區(qū)域比較分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2007年08期
4 駱永民;;公共物品、分工演進(jìn)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2008年05期
5 王洛林,魏后凱;我國西部大開發(fā)的進(jìn)展及效果評(píng)價(jià)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年10期
6 陳棟生;西部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)狀與大開發(fā)的對(duì)策[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2001年03期
7 倪鵬飛;中國城市競爭力與基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年05期
8 劉生龍;胡鞍鋼;;交通基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長:中國區(qū)域差距的視角[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年04期
9 ;芝加哥大學(xué)[J];甘肅教育;2009年09期
10 張文泉;高玉君;;電力改革三十年回眸與展望[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 楊琦;農(nóng)村基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)對(duì)農(nóng)村居民消費(fèi)的影響研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年
2 朱曉林;中國自來水業(yè)規(guī)制體系改革研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2008年
3 駱永民;城鄉(xiāng)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施均等化供給研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號(hào):1390106
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/1390106.html