【摘要】：進(jìn)入新世紀(jì)的第二個(gè)十年，北京市提出了要建設(shè)世界城市的發(fā)展目標(biāo)。隨后北京市的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)界也掀起了“世界城市研究”的熱潮。但是目前的研究還多數(shù)集中與紐約、倫敦、東京等世界城市的泛泛指標(biāo)比較研究當(dāng)中，對(duì)于世界城市的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)，尤其是產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)的比較研究還明顯不足。與此同時(shí)，近期召開的京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展會(huì)議，又為北京提出了一個(gè)迫切需要解決的問題，就是在京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的背景下，到底哪些產(chǎn)業(yè)是符合北京市建設(shè)世界城市的發(fā)展目標(biāo)的，哪些是需要周邊地區(qū)去承載的，這些通過對(duì)紐約這座世界城市的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)研究或許都能找到答案。 本文正是從這樣的研究背景和研究目的出發(fā)，，深入研究了北京市和紐約的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變歷程，歸納了影響北京市和紐約產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變的主要因素，除了各自的獨(dú)特資源稟賦，兩個(gè)地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變受到其所在國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)政治體制的影響很大，并且這也決定了兩個(gè)地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變的速度。此外，從兩個(gè)地區(qū)的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)演變歷程中，也可以看出經(jīng)典的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變理論在城市這個(gè)限定的空間范圍內(nèi)并不是完全適用，至少北京和紐約有其特殊性。而針對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的定量對(duì)比分析，本文選取了與北京市在空間范圍、城市功能、人口規(guī)模等各方面更具有可比性的紐約都市統(tǒng)計(jì)區(qū)這一區(qū)域概念。北京市與紐約是在經(jīng)濟(jì)總量上差距較大，僅是紐約都市統(tǒng)計(jì)區(qū)的近1/5，但經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)速度較快。三次產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)中，第二產(chǎn)業(yè)在北京市的國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中仍占有較高的份額，制造業(yè)內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)中，北京市以重化工業(yè)為主，而紐約都市統(tǒng)計(jì)區(qū)以都市型工業(yè)為主，現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)中，兩個(gè)地區(qū)都是以金融和房地產(chǎn)業(yè)為主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)，但北京的資本集聚能力還要略遜一籌。通過比較分析北京與紐約的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)展歷程和現(xiàn)狀特點(diǎn)，本文認(rèn)為北京可以從以下幾個(gè)方面優(yōu)化升級(jí)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、加快建設(shè)世界城市、促進(jìn)京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展：一是應(yīng)堅(jiān)持重點(diǎn)發(fā)展以現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)為主的第三產(chǎn)業(yè)，逐漸弱化制造業(yè)對(duì)地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響，去工業(yè)化的方向不能動(dòng)搖；二是制造業(yè)需要進(jìn)一步擺脫重化工業(yè)向都市型工業(yè)方向發(fā)展；三是形成具有北京特色的現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)體系。
[Abstract]:In the second decade of the new century, Beijing put forward the development goal of building a world city. Then the regional economics in Beijing also set off the upsurge of "World Urban Research". However, most of the current studies focus on the general indicators of New York, London, Tokyo and other world cities, but the comparative study of the industrial structure of the world cities, especially the industrial internal structure, is still obviously insufficient. At the same time, the recent Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated Development Conference put forward an urgent problem for Beijing, that is, under the background of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development, In the end, which industries are in line with the development goal of Beijing to build a world city, which need to be carried by the surrounding areas, these may be able to find the answer through the study of the industrial structure of New York, the world city. It is from this research background and purpose that this paper deeply studies the evolution of industrial structure in Beijing and New York, and sums up the main factors that affect the evolution of industrial structure in Beijing and New York, in addition to their unique resource endowment. The evolution of industrial structure in the two regions is greatly affected by the economic and political system of their countries, and this also determines the speed of the evolution of industrial structure in the two regions. In addition, from the evolution of the leading industries in the two regions, we can also see that the classical theory of industrial structure evolution is not fully applicable in the limited spatial range of the city, at least Beijing and New York have their particularity. According to the quantitative comparative analysis of industrial structure, this paper selects the regional concept of New York Urban Statistical District, which is more comparable to Beijing in terms of spatial scope, urban function, population size and so on. There is a big gap between Beijing and New York in terms of total economic volume, which is only nearly 1: 5 in the urban statistical area of New York, but the economic growth rate is faster. Among the three industrial structures, the secondary industry still accounts for a high share in the national economy of Beijing. In the internal structure of manufacturing industry, Beijing is dominated by heavy chemical industry, while the New York Urban Statistics District is dominated by urban industry and modern service industry. Both regions are dominated by finance and real estate, but Beijing's capital agglomeration capacity is slightly inferior. By comparing and analyzing the development process and present characteristics of industrial structure between Beijing and New York, this paper holds that Beijing can optimize and upgrade its industrial structure and speed up the construction of the world city from the following aspects. To promote the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei: first, we should persist in the development of the tertiary industry dominated by modern service industry, gradually weaken the impact of manufacturing industry on the regional economy, and the direction of deindustrialization can not be shaken; Second, the manufacturing industry needs to further get rid of the heavy chemical industry to develop in the direction of urban industry, and the third is to form a modern service industry system with Beijing characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F127;F171.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 柳雅文;趙旭;劉俊國(guó);;天津市最終產(chǎn)品本地用水量測(cè)度及其驅(qū)動(dòng)機(jī)理研究[J];資源科學(xué);2016年10期

2 王濤;彭曉云;;北京與紐約產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷的比較分析[J];河北軟件職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 柳雅文;京津冀水足跡演變及驅(qū)動(dòng)力分析[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

2 田浩男;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新的軌道交通一體化開發(fā)研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2015年

本文編號(hào)：2476367