本文選題：制度性交易成本　切入點(diǎn)：企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移　出處：《太原科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,東部憑借先天的區(qū)位優(yōu)勢和早期政策優(yōu)勢,在新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)的循環(huán)因果機(jī)制作用下,推動(dòng)了企業(yè)空間集聚和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長,而中西部地區(qū)淪為要素、原材料供應(yīng)商,形成了“中心-外圍”的發(fā)展格局。在此過程中的要素流動(dòng),顯然會(huì)影響區(qū)域全要素生產(chǎn)率,而政策優(yōu)勢或者制度性交易成本又是中國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的基本情境,因此,探明制度性交易成本、企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與區(qū)域生產(chǎn)率的內(nèi)在機(jī)制,對于實(shí)現(xiàn)區(qū)域內(nèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì)增長具有一定的理論意義與現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文從以企業(yè)異質(zhì)性為前提的“新”新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)模型出發(fā),將制度性交易成本納入其中,以此來研究制度性交易成本、企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與區(qū)域生產(chǎn)率之間的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)。理論研究表明:區(qū)域制度性交易成本會(huì)引起企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移,但存在域值。當(dāng)北部制度性交易成本在一定域值范圍并逐漸降低時(shí),由于企業(yè)的選擇效應(yīng),南部企業(yè)會(huì)按照生產(chǎn)率由高向低的順序依次向北部轉(zhuǎn)移,最終北部平均生產(chǎn)率下降,而市場份額卻在增加;當(dāng)交易成本逐漸增加并高于域值上限時(shí),由于企業(yè)的分類效應(yīng),北部的的企業(yè)會(huì)按照生產(chǎn)率由低向高的順序依次向南部轉(zhuǎn)移,隨著轉(zhuǎn)移至南部的企業(yè)數(shù)量的增加,引致北部地區(qū)的平均生產(chǎn)率水平逐漸增大,但市場份額逐漸變小。在理論分析基礎(chǔ)上,使用中國30個(gè)省份(西藏除外)2000-2014年的數(shù)據(jù),根據(jù)SFA的方法測算的各省份的全要素生產(chǎn)率,用面板固定效應(yīng)模型進(jìn)行回歸,實(shí)證結(jié)果表明制度性交易成本越高,將會(huì)使該地區(qū)的企業(yè)份額降低,但是會(huì)提高該地區(qū)的生產(chǎn)率水平,系數(shù)為0.00645。最后本文對改善地區(qū)生產(chǎn)率水平,一定要注重對制度性交易成本的關(guān)注,為降低地區(qū)的制度性交易成本提供政策性建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up to the outside world, the eastern region has promoted the spatial agglomeration and economic growth of enterprises under the influence of the circular causality mechanism of the new economic geography by virtue of its innate location advantages and early policy advantages, while the central and western regions have become elements and suppliers of raw materials.Formed the "center-periphery" development pattern.In this process, the factor flow will obviously affect the regional total factor productivity, and the policy advantage or institutional transaction cost is the basic situation of China's regional economic development.The internal mechanism of enterprise transfer and regional productivity has certain theoretical and practical significance for the realization of regional endogenous economic growth.Based on the "new" new economic geography model, which is based on the heterogeneity of enterprises, this paper takes institutional transaction costs into account and studies the internal relationship between institutional transaction costs, firm transfer and regional productivity.The theoretical study shows that regional institutional transaction costs will lead to the transfer of enterprises, but the existence of the value of the domain.When the institutional transaction cost in the north is in a certain range and gradually decreases, because of the selection effect of the firm, the southern enterprises will move to the north in the order of productivity from high to low, and finally the average productivity of the north will decrease.However, market share is increasing; when transaction costs gradually increase and exceed the limit of domain value, firms in the north will move south in order of low productivity to high productivity due to the classification effect of firms.With the increase in the number of enterprises moving to the south, the average productivity level in the northern region has gradually increased, but the market share has gradually become smaller.On the basis of theoretical analysis, the total factor productivity of 30 provinces of China (except Tibet, 2000-2014) was calculated by SFA method, and the panel fixed effect model was used to regress the total factor productivity of each province.The empirical results show that the higher the institutional transaction cost, the lower the share of firms in the region, but the higher the productivity level of the region, the coefficient is 0.00645.Finally, to improve the level of regional productivity, we must pay attention to the institutional transaction costs, and provide policy advice for reducing the regional institutional transaction costs.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F275.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜艷鳳;姜艷芳;;基于隨機(jī)前沿分析的增值稅對全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響——兼評我國增值稅制度的完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2016年04期

2 劉斌;王乃嘉;;中間品關(guān)稅減讓、契約制度與全要素生產(chǎn)率[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

3 楊汝岱;;中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年02期

4 王杰;劉斌;;環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率——基于中國工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年03期

5 陳建軍;袁凱;陳國亮;;基于企業(yè)異質(zhì)性的產(chǎn)業(yè)空間分布演化新動(dòng)力[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2013年04期

6 梁琦;李曉萍;簡澤;;異質(zhì)性企業(yè)的空間選擇與地區(qū)生產(chǎn)率差距研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2013年06期

7 梁琦;李曉萍;呂大國;;市場一體化、企業(yè)異質(zhì)性與地區(qū)補(bǔ)貼——一個(gè)解釋中國地區(qū)差距的新視角[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年02期

8 梁超;;制度變遷、人力資本積累與全要素生產(chǎn)率增長——基于動(dòng)態(tài)面板和脈沖反應(yīng)的實(shí)證研究[J];中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

9 樊綱;王小魯;馬光榮;;中國市場化進(jìn)程對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的貢獻(xiàn)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年09期

10 謝菲;尹宗成;;制度變遷與全要素生產(chǎn)率——基于2000—2008年省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年03期

，

本文編號：1709024