本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)的分區(qū)域研究　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 全要素生產(chǎn)率 對(duì)外直接投資 逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng) 技術(shù)進(jìn)步 產(chǎn)業(yè)優(yōu)化與升級(jí)

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的背景中,我國(guó)正處在從吸引外資向“走出去”進(jìn)行對(duì)外直接投資的轉(zhuǎn)型階段。在很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間里,我國(guó)通過(guò)吸引外資獲得了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),但隨著競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的加劇、利潤(rùn)的縮減以及投資企業(yè)對(duì)核心技術(shù)的保護(hù),吸引外資的方式已經(jīng)無(wú)法滿足我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期發(fā)展和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化的需求。從2001年我國(guó)加入WTO,并且強(qiáng)調(diào)實(shí)施“走出去”發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略以來(lái),我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資進(jìn)入了快速發(fā)展的階段,但是我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的發(fā)展和技術(shù)水平還與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家有很大的差距,在復(fù)雜的全球分工協(xié)作環(huán)境下,探索我國(guó)技術(shù)獲取型對(duì)外直接投資是否存在逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng),以及如何提高逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng),從而實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)技術(shù)進(jìn)步和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)具有重大的戰(zhàn)略和實(shí)踐意義。本文首先回顧并評(píng)述了發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)外直接投資理論和逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)。接下來(lái)著重分析了我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的整體發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和特征,提出了我國(guó)技術(shù)獲取型對(duì)外直接投資占比少和我國(guó)各區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和對(duì)外直接投資發(fā)展不一致等問(wèn)題。然后分析了逆向技術(shù)溢出的微觀模型和其作用機(jī)制,并且從企業(yè)、產(chǎn)業(yè)和國(guó)家三個(gè)層次深入分析了逆向技術(shù)溢出的機(jī)理,完整的提出了從進(jìn)行技術(shù)獲取型對(duì)外直接投資,消化吸收先進(jìn)技術(shù)反饋到母公司,進(jìn)而提升母公司技術(shù)創(chuàng)新水平,并且通過(guò)技術(shù)擴(kuò)散到產(chǎn)業(yè)與關(guān)聯(lián)產(chǎn)業(yè),獲得傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)優(yōu)升級(jí)和新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,最后促進(jìn)國(guó)民技術(shù)進(jìn)步和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的鏈條。在實(shí)證方面,本文選取了2003年至2011年對(duì)外直接投資的省際面板數(shù)據(jù),應(yīng)用LP的國(guó)際RD溢出模型,實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)后發(fā)現(xiàn)全國(guó)逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)顯著存在,但是與國(guó)內(nèi)研發(fā)對(duì)全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響相比,效果相對(duì)微弱。由于我國(guó)各區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的差異,再分別對(duì)東、中、西部的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行比較研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)各區(qū)域的效果不盡相同,相比我國(guó)中、西部,東部對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響更大�；谖覈�(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的現(xiàn)狀分析和逆向技術(shù)溢出機(jī)理,本文從企業(yè)、產(chǎn)業(yè)和國(guó)家三個(gè)層次詳盡分析了全國(guó)和各區(qū)域的實(shí)證結(jié)果,并輔以定性和定量分析來(lái)解釋其原因。相比中、西部地區(qū),東部地區(qū)由于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展、技術(shù)水平、經(jīng)濟(jì)體制、金融環(huán)境和對(duì)外投資的發(fā)展等各方面都與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家更加接近,所以對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)全要素生產(chǎn)率影響更大。最后根據(jù)前面分析的結(jié)果,同樣從不同層面給出了對(duì)應(yīng)的政策建議,并且針對(duì)我國(guó)各區(qū)域發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,對(duì)外直接投資現(xiàn)狀和技術(shù)發(fā)展水平的不同,給出了適當(dāng)?shù)恼呓ㄗh。
[Abstract]:In the background of economic globalization, China is in the transition stage from attracting foreign capital to "going out" for foreign direct investment. In a long period of time, China has obtained economic growth through attracting foreign capital. But as competition intensifies, profits shrink and investment companies protect core technologies. The way to attract foreign capital has been unable to meet the needs of long-term development and industrial structure optimization in China. Since 2001, China has joined the WTO and emphasized the implementation of the "going out" development strategy. China's foreign direct investment has entered the stage of rapid development, but the development and technical level of China's foreign direct investment is still a big gap with the developed countries, in the complex global division of labor and cooperation environment. To explore the existence of reverse technology spillover effect in China's technology acquisition FDI and how to improve the reverse technology spillover effect. It is of great strategic and practical significance to realize China's technological progress and industrial structure upgrading. Firstly, this paper reviews and reviews the relevant literature on the theory of FDI and the spillover effect of reverse technology in developing countries. To focus on the analysis of the overall development of China's foreign direct investment status and characteristics. This paper puts forward some problems such as the low proportion of technology acquisition FDI and the inconsistency of regional economic development and FDI development in China, and then analyzes the micro model of reverse technology spillover and its mechanism. And from the enterprise, industry and national three levels of in-depth analysis of reverse technology spillover mechanism, the integrity of the proposed from the technology acquisition type of foreign direct investment, digestion and absorption of advanced technology feedback to the parent company. And then improve the technology innovation level of the parent company, and through technology diffusion to the industry and related industries, to obtain the upgrading of traditional industries and the development of emerging industries. Finally, promote the chain of national technological progress and economic growth. In the empirical aspect, this paper selects the inter-provincial panel data of FDI from 2003 to 2011, and applies LP's international Rd spillover model. Empirical test found that the national reverse technology spillover effect exists significantly, but compared with domestic R & D on total factor productivity, the effect is relatively weak. The comparative study of the data of China and the west shows that the effect of each region is different, compared with that of our country, the western part. Based on the analysis of the current situation of China's foreign direct investment and the mechanism of reverse technology spillover, this paper starts from the enterprise. Industrial and national three levels of detailed analysis of the national and regional empirical results, and assisted by qualitative and quantitative analysis to explain the reasons. Compared with the western region, the eastern region due to economic development, the level of technology. The economic system, financial environment and the development of foreign investment are closer to the developed countries, so FDI has a greater impact on total factor productivity. Finally, according to the results of the previous analysis. At the same time, the corresponding policy suggestions are given from different levels, and the appropriate policy recommendations are given according to the development situation of China's regions, the status quo of foreign direct investment and the level of technological development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張海波;俞佳根;;對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)母國(guó)的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——基于東亞新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢;2012年01期

2 李梅;柳士昌;;人力資本與國(guó)際R&D溢出——基于OFDI傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制的實(shí)證研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2011年03期

3 李燕;韓伯棠;張慶普;;FDI溢出與區(qū)域技術(shù)差距的雙門(mén)檻效應(yīng)研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2011年02期

4 汪斌;李偉慶;周明海;;ODI與中國(guó)自主創(chuàng)新:機(jī)理分析與實(shí)證研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2010年06期

5 劉明霞;王學(xué)軍;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年09期

6 白潔;;對(duì)外直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——對(duì)中國(guó)全要素生產(chǎn)率影響的經(jīng)驗(yàn)檢驗(yàn)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年08期

7 陳菲瓊;虞旭丹;;企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資對(duì)自主創(chuàng)新的反饋機(jī)制研究:以萬(wàn)向集團(tuán)OFDI為例[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年03期

8 林青;陳湛勻;;中國(guó)技術(shù)尋求型跨國(guó)投資戰(zhàn)略:理論與實(shí)證研究——基于主要10個(gè)國(guó)家FDI反向溢出效應(yīng)模型的測(cè)度[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2008年06期

9 鄒玉娟;陳漓高;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資與技術(shù)提升的實(shí)證研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年05期

10 王英;劉思峰;;國(guó)際技術(shù)外溢渠道的實(shí)證研究[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1415345