本文關鍵詞：新重商主義理論研究和實踐分析　出處：《山東大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 新重商主義 自由主義 區(qū)域一體化

【摘要】：新重商主義是重商主義的思想在新的時代的嶄新體現(xiàn),早期用來解釋美國的一系列貿(mào)易保護的經(jīng)濟學新思想。隨著世界各國貿(mào)易活動程度的加深與范圍的拓廣,對新重商主義的研究也更加深入。經(jīng)過長期的研究經(jīng)濟學家們發(fā)現(xiàn)新重商主義早在美國貿(mào)易保護政策之前已經(jīng)產(chǎn)生并可以有效的解決凱恩斯主義滯漲遺留的一系列目前無法解決的經(jīng)濟問題,經(jīng)濟學家已對新重商主義的當前地位給予了肯定,認為新重商主義是解決當前世界經(jīng)濟難題的方法之一。新重商主義主要思想繼續(xù)古老的重商主義的基本理念:國家宏觀調控發(fā)展貿(mào)易、通過貿(mào)易順差獲得資本積累。這無疑是非常適應當前全球化的程度日益增高的全球市場。近年來無論是強國還是弱國都對新重商主義非常重視,但是基于各種原因各國的實施程度大相徑庭,例如相對完整的日本新重商主義,實施部分新重商主義外貿(mào)政策的美國,但是都對于解決當前問題效果顯著。因此新重商主義一度被認為是一種比新凱恩斯主義與新自由主義更適應當前世界格局的經(jīng)濟學主義。但是伴隨著區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化的發(fā)展壯大,直至世界上第一個完整強大的區(qū)域一體化集團----歐盟的成立,各國發(fā)現(xiàn)區(qū)域一體化比新重商主義更為快速有效的解決經(jīng)濟問題,它所推崇的區(qū)域內(nèi)完全自由思想也被自由主義學者認為是自由主義與初步全球化的完美體現(xiàn)。不過隨著歐盟的進一步發(fā)展,內(nèi)部的自由化程度更深,歐盟對于外界的貿(mào)易問題也逐步體現(xiàn)出來,各種形式的貿(mào)易壁壘開始建立在歐盟與世界各國之間,歐盟與各國的貿(mào)易也從自由逐步轉變?yōu)榉e累資本、追求貿(mào)易順差的趨勢,這和新重商主義的基本理念類似。為探究區(qū)域一體化的轉變究竟是不是只是新重商主義的一種新的實踐方式,本文將對比較典型的新重商主義國家日本進行分析,總結新重商主義的本質與具體政策體現(xiàn),再進一步的對美國與歐盟進行案例比較與分析,結合Combessaadi-sedik和Leamer的計量方法,再對美國與歐盟的貿(mào)易政策進行定量分析,驗證歐盟確實采用了新重商主義的貿(mào)易政策,并比美國的新重商主義貿(mào)易系數(shù)更高,以此證明歐盟的區(qū)域一體化是一種新重商主義實踐的新方式。
[Abstract]:Neo-mercantilism is a new embodiment of mercantilism in the new era. It is used to explain a series of new economic ideas of trade protection in the United States in the early stage. With the deepening of the degree of trade activities and the expansion of the scope of various countries in the world. After a long period of research economists have found that neo-mercantilism has emerged long before the United States trade protection policy and can effectively solve the legacy of Keynesian stagflation. List current economic problems that cannot be solved. Economists have affirmed the current status of neo-mercantilism. It is considered that neo-mercantilism is one of the ways to solve the problems in the world economy. The main idea of neo-mercantilism is to continue the basic idea of ancient mercantilism: state macro-control to develop trade. Capital accumulation through the trade surplus is undoubtedly a global market that is well adapted to the increasing degree of globalization. In recent years, both powerful and weak countries have attached great importance to neo-mercantilism. However, the degree of implementation varies greatly for various reasons, such as the relatively complete Japanese neo-mercantilism and the United States, which implements part of the neo-mercantilist foreign trade policy. Therefore, neo-mercantilism was once considered to be a kind of economicism which is more suitable to the current world pattern than neo-Keynesianism and neoliberalism. But it is accompanied by a regional economy. The development of the body. Until the establishment of the European Union, the world's first integrated and powerful regional integration group, countries found that regional integration was more efficient than neo-mercantilism in solving economic problems. The idea of complete freedom in the region is also regarded by liberalism scholars as the perfect embodiment of liberalism and preliminary globalization, but with the further development of the European Union, the degree of internal liberalization is deeper. European Union for the external trade problems are gradually reflected, various forms of trade barriers began to be established between the European Union and the rest of the world, trade between the European Union and other countries has gradually changed from freedom to capital accumulation. The trend of pursuing trade surplus is similar to the basic idea of neo-mercantilism. In order to find out whether the transformation of regional integration is just a new practical way of neo-mercantilism. This paper will analyze the typical neo-mercantilism country Japan, sum up the essence and concrete policy embodiment of neo-mercantilism, and further compare and analyze the case between the United States and the European Union. Combined with the measurement methods of Combessaadi-sedik and Leamer, the quantitative analysis of the trade policy between the United States and the European Union is carried out. It is proved that the European Union's regional integration is a new way of new mercantilism practice by verifying that the European Union has adopted the new mercantilist trade policy and has a higher trade coefficient than the American new mercantilism.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F091.31

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 羅淑媚;;從輪胎特保案論述美國當前的新重商主義[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年05期

2 劉時維;;美國的新重商主義與我國必須應對的挑戰(zhàn)[J];吉林省經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2007年03期

3 王宏淼;;中國的“新重商主義”及其改進思路：對外開放模式的一個審視[J];經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2008年04期

4 關春玉;;重商主義的分析研究及新重商主義的弊端分析[J];天津市財貿(mào)管理干部學院學報;2008年03期

5 胡燕喃;;論“新重商主義”[J];中國市場;2008年26期

6 張潔;;美國的新重商主義與中國的貿(mào)易政策選擇[J];吉林省經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2008年05期

7 張?zhí)礻?;論現(xiàn)代貿(mào)易中的新重商主義[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年05期

8 吳少云;;對中美輪胎特保案的新重商主義視角分析[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年09期

9 王勝偉;劉家誠;;中國新重商主義的特征、困境與對策分析[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟;2013年16期

10 W.霍金斯 ,金日;新重商主義:當前有征收關稅的理由嗎?[J];國外社會科學;1984年06期

相關重要報紙文章 前2條

1 本報評論員 笑蜀;市場經(jīng)濟的鴨,抑或新重商主義的雞?[N];南方周末;2010年

2 中國醫(yī)藥保健品進出口商會綜合部主任 許銘;“新重商主義”攻擊下外貿(mào)何去何從[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟報;2010年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 付明松;中美新重商主義比較分析[D];大連海事大學;2015年

2 戴安然;新重商主義理論研究和實踐分析[D];山東大學;2017年

，

本文編號：1400260