征轉(zhuǎn)分離制度的創(chuàng)新研究
[Abstract]:Under the background of rapid economic development, urbanization and rapid industrialization, the land dual track system, which belongs to the state and the rural collective economic organizations, is facing the test of the rapid development of the market economy. The demand for construction land far exceeds the supply of construction land, and the contradiction between people and land is becoming more and more tense. These have accelerated the current land examination and approval system to constantly show its existing problems in the process of practice. For example, there are many links in land approval. Long time, complicated materials needed for examination and approval, low efficiency of land expropriation and approval, high system cost, delay the development process of some major construction projects; The imperfection of relevant laws and regulations leads to the abuse of administrative power and corruption, and the production and life of peasants who have been expropriated can not be guaranteed. For the purpose of economic benefit, land requisition blindly and unplanned and unscientific land use make the land resources idle and waste, resulting in great waste and so on. On the basis of analyzing the malpractice of the current examination and approval system, the necessity of reform and innovation of the land approval system is discussed and the reform suggestions are put forward. In recent years, some provinces and cities of our country have gradually carried out the pilot work of the system of separation of levy and transfer, and have made achievements in stages. Based on the analysis of the practice of land expropriation and separation in Guangxi, Hunan, Tianjin, Yunnan, Chongqing and other regions, the present situation of land expropriation and separation system in China is analyzed. According to the difference of land expropriation and conversion approval, the paper discusses whether the separation system of land expropriation and conversion is reasonable. It is concluded that in theory and practice, the separation system of land expropriation and conversion is possible, and the separation of land expropriation and conversion is reasonable. Finally, the paper evaluates the main achievements and experiences of the separation system of land expropriation and conversion, and the suggestions for improving and perfecting the management system of the newly added construction land index. The innovation of land collection and conversion separation system is not the reform and overthrow of the synchronous system, but a breakthrough in the restraint of the old pattern. In general, the innovation and development of the land collection and transfer separation system makes the land examination and approval system more flexible in our country. More effective. At the same time, some specific innovative models of land expropriation and separation system began to be put forward gradually. There is no fixed logical order in the innovation mode of separation of levy and transfer system, but the order of collecting examination and approval is different from that of transferring approval. By collecting and analyzing a large number of documents and materials, combining with the objective summary of field investigation, the author suggests that each region should be based on the actual development of the region and the supply and demand situation of construction land. According to the need to implement the specific system of separation of land requisition. In the process of analysis, the author makes a careful study on the approval of agricultural land conversion and collection and approval, and thinks that the two approvals are usually bundled together, which is not reasonable. There is a fundamental difference between the approval of agricultural land conversion and the examination and approval of expropriation, so the author thinks that the examination and approval of conversion and collection can be separated. At the same time, it summarizes the main achievements of the separation system in practice and plays an important role in the improvement and reform of the new construction land index management system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:F301
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 胡建;劉永利;許月明;;城市化進(jìn)程中耕地安全機(jī)制構(gòu)建——以保定市為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2011年33期
2 劉守英;;集體土地資本化與農(nóng)村城市化——北京市鄭各莊村調(diào)查[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期
3 章劍生;;行政征收程序論——以集體土地征收為例[J];東方法學(xué);2009年02期
4 肖陽(yáng);;“征轉(zhuǎn)分離”土地審批管理模式初探[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2012年28期
5 岳巍;;淺談土地征用[J];才智;2010年30期
6 肖勁松;;現(xiàn)行用地審批模式亟待改革[J];國(guó)土資源導(dǎo)刊;2009年07期
7 盧峰;;集體土地征收與農(nóng)地轉(zhuǎn)用審批[J];湖南公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期
8 杜偉;黃敏;黃善明;;進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化耕地保護(hù)機(jī)制的思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年16期
9 方賢雷;鄧映之;杜文玲;;美國(guó)的耕地保護(hù)制度經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對(duì)我國(guó)耕地保護(hù)的啟示[J];中國(guó)商界(上半月);2010年03期
10 徐燕峰;;農(nóng)村土地征收補(bǔ)償制度之研究[J];科技廣場(chǎng);2009年02期
,本文編號(hào):2372472
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2372472.html