本文選題：生態(tài)旅游　切入點(diǎn)：農(nóng)戶收入　出處：《農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)》2017年07期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：基于2016年7月~8月在云南省4個(gè)國家公園的432份農(nóng)戶調(diào)查問卷,運(yùn)用雙重差分模型,研究了國家公園生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展前后,參與國家公園生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展的農(nóng)戶和未參與國家公園生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展的農(nóng)戶在收入方面發(fā)生變化的差異。從基本回歸結(jié)果看,國家公園生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展前后,處理組和對(duì)照組相比較,人均總收入和人均工資性收入均得到了顯著的提高;人均財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入雖然隨著時(shí)間的變化而增加,但是與是否參與生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展無關(guān);參與國家公園生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展對(duì)農(nóng)戶的人均經(jīng)營性收入、人均轉(zhuǎn)移性收入沒有顯著性影響。在增加了控制變量后,結(jié)果顯示,農(nóng)戶的讀書時(shí)間、家庭耕地面積、林地面積、參與生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展時(shí)間正向影響農(nóng)戶的人均總收入,家庭人口數(shù)對(duì)農(nóng)戶人均總收入有負(fù)向影響;家庭人口數(shù)、耕地面積和參與時(shí)間對(duì)人均財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入有正向影響;參與時(shí)間會(huì)正向影響人均工資性收入,家庭人口數(shù)對(duì)人均工資性收入有負(fù)面影響。
[Abstract]:Based on a questionnaire of 432 farmers in four national parks in Yunnan Province from July 2016 to August, the authors studied the development of eco-tourism in national parks by using a double differential model. The difference in income between farmers participating in the development of ecotourism in national parks and those who did not participate in the development of ecotourism in national parks. From the basic regression results, before and after the development of ecotourism in national parks, Compared with the control group, the per capita total income and the per capita wage income of the treatment group were significantly increased, although the per capita property income increased with the change of time, it had nothing to do with whether or not to participate in the development of ecotourism. Participation in the development of ecotourism in national parks has no significant impact on the per capita operating income and per capita transfer income of farmers. After adding control variables, the results show that the time of study, the area of family cultivated land, the area of woodland, The time of participating in the development of ecotourism has a positive impact on the per capita income of farmers, and the number of household population has a negative impact on the per capita income of farmers, and the number of households, the area of cultivated land and the time of participation have positive effects on the per capita income of property. The time of participation will positively affect the per capita wage income, and the number of households will have a negative impact on the per capita wage income.
【作者單位】： 北京林業(yè)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;昆明學(xué)院生命科學(xué)與技術(shù)系;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“跨境民族的流動(dòng)性、空間生產(chǎn)與文化建構(gòu)——云南世居民族案例”(編號(hào):41261031)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：F323.8;F592.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 傅琴琴;;日本農(nóng)村生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展研究[J];世界農(nóng)業(yè);2013年01期

2 鄭杰;;青海林業(yè)生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展對(duì)策的思考[J];青�？萍�;2007年04期

3 袁力;;現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)視域下的生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展[J];湖南農(nóng)機(jī);2013年07期

4 周游;;新鄉(xiāng)村主義與農(nóng)村生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展探析——以浙江臨安“綠色家園,富麗山村”的建設(shè)實(shí)踐為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2012年11期

5 王式玉;;低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)視角下黑龍江生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展探討[J];黑龍江省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

6 翟琴;李林;;農(nóng)村生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展?jié)摿υu(píng)價(jià)與開發(fā)策略——以雙流縣為例[J];湖南財(cái)政經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

7 張敏;馬守春;邢震;李文博;;西藏林芝地區(qū)生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展對(duì)策[J];林業(yè)調(diào)查規(guī)劃;2006年05期

8 劉高潮;;希拉穆仁草原抓扶貧移民開發(fā),促生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展[J];致富之友;2003年01期

9 周游;;新鄉(xiāng)村主義與農(nóng)村生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展探析——以浙江臨安“綠色家園,富麗山村”的建設(shè)實(shí)踐為例(英文)[J];Journal of Landscape Research;2012年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃興;永安竹林生態(tài)旅游發(fā)展研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1559145