發(fā)布時間：2018-10-19 18:15

【摘要】：2008年美國金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)后,會計穩(wěn)健性在企業(yè)中發(fā)揮的作用以及高管薪酬契約的有效性這兩個問題引發(fā)了人們的關(guān)注。會計穩(wěn)健性需求主要來自于契約,其中高管薪酬契約是產(chǎn)生會計穩(wěn)健性需求的原因之一。隨著資本主義經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度逐步確立,所有權(quán)和經(jīng)營權(quán)的分離產(chǎn)生了委托-代理關(guān)系。由于信息不對稱以及利己主義,會產(chǎn)生代理人的道德風(fēng)險和逆向選擇。委托人為了減輕代理人的道德風(fēng)險和自利行為,便在企業(yè)會計和薪酬制定方面引入了會計穩(wěn)健性。但會計穩(wěn)健性在高管薪酬契約中的運用并沒有達(dá)到“最佳水平”,高管薪酬契約“好消息”和“壞消息”的不對稱反映的薪酬設(shè)計理念應(yīng)運而生。這種高管薪酬契約的設(shè)計從一個側(cè)面反映了會計穩(wěn)健性存在于管理層薪酬契約中。目前我國上市公司基本建立了以會計業(yè)績?yōu)榛A(chǔ)的高管薪酬評價體系,但是由于信息不對稱,管理層為了實現(xiàn)自身利益的最大化,產(chǎn)生盈余管理的動機(jī),進(jìn)而會影響到企業(yè)的會計穩(wěn)健性水平。 首先對國內(nèi)外有關(guān)會計穩(wěn)健性和高管薪酬契約方面的研究成果進(jìn)行回顧,接著是對相關(guān)理論的闡述。通過以上的回顧和分析,提出本文的假設(shè)并進(jìn)行實證分析。本文選取了2004-2011年的我國上市公司的財務(wù)數(shù)據(jù),對假設(shè)一和假設(shè)二分別運用Basu (1997)盈余-股票報酬計量方法和Basu(1997)盈余持續(xù)性計量方法對會計穩(wěn)健性進(jìn)行度量。借鑒Leone,Wu和Zmi merman的方法,構(gòu)建了假設(shè)一模型；借鑒Basu (1997)盈余持續(xù)性模型構(gòu)建了假設(shè)二的模型。通過對數(shù)據(jù)回歸分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)：(1)在我國上市公司的高管薪酬契約中存在會計穩(wěn)健性,因為當(dāng)公司出現(xiàn)“好消息”時,管理層薪酬與公司業(yè)績的相關(guān)性程度低于當(dāng)公司出現(xiàn)“壞消息”時。(2)在我國上市公司中,高管薪酬與會計業(yè)績的相關(guān)性程度越高,會計穩(wěn)健性越差。
[Abstract]:After the outbreak of the American financial crisis in 2008, the role of accounting conservatism in enterprises and the effectiveness of executive compensation contracts have attracted people's attention. Accounting conservatism demand mainly comes from contract, among which executive compensation contract is one of the reasons for accounting conservatism demand. With the development of capitalist economy, modern enterprise system has been gradually established, and the separation of ownership and management has produced principal-agent relationship. Because of information asymmetry and egoism, agent moral hazard and adverse selection will be produced. In order to reduce the moral hazard and self-interest of the agent, the principal introduces the accounting conservatism in the aspects of enterprise accounting and salary formulation. However, the application of accounting conservatism in executive compensation contract has not reached the "best level", and the asymmetric compensation design concept of "good news" and "bad news" of executive compensation contract emerges as the times require. The design of executive compensation contract reflects accounting conservatism in management compensation contract. At present, the listed companies in our country have basically established an executive compensation evaluation system based on accounting performance. However, because of the asymmetry of information, in order to maximize their own interests, the management has the motive of earnings management. In turn, it will affect the accounting conservatism level of enterprises. Firstly, it reviews the domestic and foreign research results on accounting conservatism and executive compensation contract, and then expounds the relevant theories. Through the above review and analysis, this paper puts forward the hypothesis and carries on the empirical analysis. This paper selects the financial data of Chinese listed companies from 2004 to 2011 and measures accounting conservatism using Basu (1997) earnings-stock return measurement method and Basu (1997) earnings persistence measurement method respectively. Using the methods of Leone,Wu and Zmi merman to construct a hypothesis-one model, and Basu (1997) earnings persistence model to construct a hypothesis-2 model. Through regression analysis of data, we find that: (1) Accounting conservatism exists in executive compensation contracts of listed companies in China, because when there is "good news" in companies, The correlation between executive compensation and corporate performance is lower than that when there is "bad news". (2) in Chinese listed companies, the higher the correlation between executive compensation and accounting performance, the worse accounting conservatism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F275.2;F272.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董紅星;;會計穩(wěn)健性計量方法應(yīng)用探析[J];財會月刊;2008年35期

2 劉嫦;袁琳;;會計穩(wěn)健性經(jīng)濟(jì)后果研究——基于公司再貸款業(yè)務(wù)視角[J];財會月刊;2010年18期

3 杜勝利;翟艷玲;;總經(jīng)理年度報酬決定因素的實證分析——以我國上市公司為例[J];管理世界;2005年08期

4 曹宇;李琳;孫錚;;公司控制權(quán)對會計盈余穩(wěn)健性影響的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2005年14期

5 陳冬華,陳信元,萬華林;國有企業(yè)中的薪酬管制與在職消費[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年02期

6 江偉;;會計穩(wěn)健性與管理層薪酬對會計業(yè)績的敏感度[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年05期

7 李增泉,盧文彬;會計盈余的穩(wěn)健性:發(fā)現(xiàn)與啟示[J];會計研究;2003年02期

8 盧靜;胡運權(quán);;會計信息與管理者報酬激勵契約研究綜述[J];會計研究;2007年01期

9 楊華軍;;會計穩(wěn)健性研究述評[J];會計研究;2007年01期

10 毛新述;戴德明;;會計制度變遷與盈余穩(wěn)健性:一項理論分析[J];會計研究;2008年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王寧;會計穩(wěn)健性影響因素及經(jīng)濟(jì)后果研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2281956