本文關鍵詞：新制度經(jīng)濟學與新經(jīng)濟社會學的比較及綜合：交易組織制度分析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

        本文是一項考察經(jīng)濟和社會問題基本分析方法的基礎理論研究。主要集中于對交易方式、交易組織和交易制度進行新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的比較及綜合研究。在社會科學領域特別是經(jīng)濟學和社會學中對交易方式、交易組織和制度已有大量的研究,上個世紀七八十年代新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的蓬勃發(fā)展更是將關于交易組織和制度的研究推向了新的高度。不過,新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學對這一問題的研究在基本方法論、研究主線和邏輯方法等理論構件上既有相同點又有區(qū)別。對于交易組織和制度的已有分析,經(jīng)濟學絕大多數(shù)研究的視角集中于企業(yè)和市場,而只有較少的研究涉及家庭或家族,社會學的研究主要是從社會交往和網(wǎng)絡的角度去研究家庭,側(cè)重于將其作為社會組織細胞的社會功能。但是,家庭或家族作為精神情感交流的場所,它在不同歷史階段和不同的國家地區(qū)一直都具有經(jīng)濟交易的組織功能,而且在不同的法律體系完善程度以及不同的文化傳統(tǒng)和社會規(guī)范的情況下,家庭作為經(jīng)濟組織形式發(fā)揮的作用也不盡相同。本文力圖通過新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學基本方法論和理論體系的比較及綜合,嘗試構建綜合的理論分析框架——交易組織制度分析,在對交易組織制度的研究上,將家庭、企業(yè)以及市場等作為交易組織形態(tài)和規(guī)制制度納入一個統(tǒng)一的、整合的分析框架中去。理論綜合是針對經(jīng)濟學和社會學共同關注的研究對象,嘗試建構一種能夠在理論上闡述經(jīng)濟與社會關系,又能對經(jīng)驗事實有比較好解釋力的理論框架。要進行這樣的嘗試,首先要尋求一些基本分析概念,它們反映經(jīng)濟社會關系,并且包含微觀行動因素和宏觀結構因素,這些基本概念能使宏微觀因素分析能夠在一種綜合的基本方法論的基礎上結合起來。所以,本文的研究思路和邏輯是:從已有理論和經(jīng)驗事實中抽象出作為理論研究的基本概念;從這些概念的界定中得到微觀分析與宏觀分析相結合,綜合分析經(jīng)濟與社會關系的基本理論構件;然后,通過對新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學方法論的比較和綜合,建立這些基本概念和理論構件之間的邏輯關系;最后,通過對決定交易組織制度建立以及交易組織內(nèi)部結構的產(chǎn)生、變化和互動關系的分析,初步建構起一種綜合的經(jīng)濟社會分析方法,即交易組織制度分析。在這一過程中,建構整合性的方法論處于核心地位。本文從考慮微觀層面?zhèn)�人行為假定的中間層次分析出發(fā),綜合新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的研究方法考察在文化信念因素等非正規(guī)制度的影響下社會交易方式和制度的形成和變遷,以及既有社會交易結構和交易方式的占優(yōu)——被占優(yōu)關系對文化信念演化的影響。另外,也將從歷史的視角考察不同文化信念影響下有關國家和地區(qū)的特定歷史階段的社會和經(jīng)濟交易制度變遷,分析文化因素對不同社會交易結構形成和變遷的影響,以及交易機制的結構性變化對文化信念的反作用。本文比較和綜合了新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的研究方法論,在一個更寬廣的范圍內(nèi),論述社會交易結構的決定和變遷,文化信念和社會交易方式的相互關系及共同演化。對于規(guī)范分析,具體而言,在考慮個體選擇的交易制度分析的基礎上建立了文化信念等非正規(guī)制度對社會交易結構影響的一般分析框架,重新理解和審視家庭、企業(yè)、市場等具體交易方式的功能和范圍決定因素。對于歷史分析,具體而言,立足于經(jīng)濟史,用歷史比較制度分析的方法從不同文化因素影響下的國家或地區(qū)的社會和經(jīng)濟變遷過程中考察文化因素對不同社會交易結構形成和演變的影響,以及交易機制的變化對文化信念的反作用。關注“自我實施”、“第二方實施”和“第三方實施”契約各自運行機制以及相互影響;并不簡單將交易制度作為非外生變量,而是著重研究交易制度生成與進化的影響和決定因素,即研究經(jīng)濟制度差異性的原因;將研究的視野不斷地從市場交易制度拓展到包括非市場交易制度在內(nèi)的交易制度結構,從制度安排向制度環(huán)境,從經(jīng)濟、政治、法律制度向文化傳統(tǒng)、價值觀念和意識形態(tài)拓展,尤其重視影響制度諸因素中的文化傳統(tǒng)、價值觀念和意識形態(tài)的作用。本文的分析結構如下:第一章為導言部分,第二章為新制度經(jīng)濟學的理論體系評述,通過對已有文獻的考察,評析了新制度經(jīng)濟學對交易方式、交易組織及制度的研究及發(fā)展線索。第三章為新經(jīng)濟社會學的理論體系評述,對新經(jīng)濟社會學的產(chǎn)生和理論構建進行介紹和評析。第四章為新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的比較及綜合。這一部分從研究對象、研究范圍、研究方法和學科功能等方面系統(tǒng)地對新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學(特別是它們的核心理論:交易成本理論和社會網(wǎng)絡理論)進行比較以及整合。對已有理論研究進行比較和評述,探討理論構件和體系的差異以及溝通融合的問題,以期為建立綜合新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學研究范式的研究框架做好理論基礎準備;第五章是一個綜合的分析框架——交易組織制度分析的初步構建,界定了其分析對象,基本前提假設,研究方法論以及分析的具體層次,并且闡述了新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學融合的學理基礎以及學科融合的科學哲學意義;第六章界定了交易組織和制度的主要性質(zhì),對家庭、企業(yè)以及市場等代表性的交易組織和制度進行較為具體的研究,建立了引入違約風險的風險分擔理論模型;第七章集中研究經(jīng)濟行為的文化嵌入性和經(jīng)濟制度的社會構建,并以文化傳統(tǒng)影響下中國養(yǎng)老方式安排以及社會養(yǎng)老結構的研究為例;第八章為研究展望,從理論研究和案例應用研究兩個方面探討本文研究的進一步發(fā)展方向;第九章是本文的結論。本文的主要觀點是:(1)交易、交易組織和交易制度是社會科學領域共同關注的研究對象。本文在經(jīng)濟學和社會學研究范疇內(nèi)對交易、交易組織和交易制度等概念作了分析,然后重點比較新制度經(jīng)濟學與新經(jīng)濟社會學對交易、交易組織和交易制度等的研究在理論范式、分析方法和基本結論等構件上的異同。通過比較和綜合,本項研究說明新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學之間的理論對立并沒有兩個領域某些學者所設定的那樣嚴苛,而且,本文力圖在對交易、交易組織和交易制度等研究對象的分析中構建基于新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學研究特質(zhì)的整合的、統(tǒng)一的分析框架。對于經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)象的研究,在歷史和社會的兩個維度進行分析更有助于更深刻地把握問題的實質(zhì)。(2)對于新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學研究范式及方法的綜合,本文給出了兩個研究范式融合的學理基礎——理論基點和價值共識(理論綜合的容易程度即“成本”)以及理論的互補性(理論綜合的解釋力即“收益”)。并且,從科學哲學的角度理解新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學這兩個研究體系的融合所帶來的“知識增長”,這種融合所帶來的范式轉(zhuǎn)變符合庫恩的藝術模式而非科學模式,因此,也就不存在交流失靈(不可通約)的必然性和范式替代的完全性,在社會科學中,我們可以很清晰地看到,爭論的結局通常是接受新的理論但卻不完全毀壞和拋棄舊的,綜合的分析范式成為可能。(3)企業(yè)、家庭和市場等交易組織和制度形式,根據(jù)它們在經(jīng)濟社會中的所發(fā)揮的職能以及經(jīng)濟學和社會學已有的研究,可以從交易成本(包括交易聯(lián)結成本(transacting connection cost))、交易風險分擔(risk sharing,主要針對客觀的風險和不確定性)、違約風險和契約規(guī)制特點等界區(qū)。從這些方面的定義一方面可以提煉出了交易的核心性質(zhì),另一方面契合了交易組織制度分析的框架。(4)家庭、企業(yè)、市場等交易組織和制度安排,在新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學綜合的分析框架中,可以用非正式制度(社會網(wǎng)絡)和正式制度的雙重規(guī)制下,基于交易成本和特定文化傳統(tǒng)影響下個體偏好的分析這一本文定義的交易組織制度分析方法來進行統(tǒng)一研究。交易成本和文化傳統(tǒng)影響下的個體偏好共同決定了人們對交易組織制度的選擇,在初級交易(指基本的、保障性的、滿足馬斯洛意義上低層次需要的交易需求)中應該由交易成本主導交易組織制度的選擇,而在次級交易(指非基本的、非保障性的、滿足馬斯洛高層次需要的交易需求)中可以充分兼顧文化傳統(tǒng)和社會習俗影響下的個體偏好�；诮灰壮杀镜某跫壗灰捉M織制度安排的有效性影響次級交易包容個體偏好的程度,即初級交易的制度安排越節(jié)約交易成本,個體在次級交易中越有能力選擇包含較多個體主觀偏好的組織制度形式,這種情形下次級交易的效率甚至會比初級交易還要高。本項研究主要的創(chuàng)新之處:(1)從考慮微觀層面?zhèn)�人選擇的嵌入性及社會網(wǎng)絡分析出發(fā),考察社會交易結構和經(jīng)濟效率等宏觀層面的問題。在一定程度上連接了相關問題微觀和宏觀的經(jīng)濟研究。構建了對有關問題研究的一般性分析框架。(2)對于交易方式的有關具體問題,例如基于家庭的互惠交易的問題,經(jīng)濟學和社會學等領域往往分別從經(jīng)濟因素、社會因素、文化因素等方面進行分析,本文嘗試建立一個跨社會學科的整合的分析框架,研究不同社會交易結構的決定和變遷。(3)將家庭、企業(yè)、市場等具體的交易方式(經(jīng)濟學研究中經(jīng)常考察的對象)置入文化信念等非正規(guī)制度和社會交易制度關系的研究中,從而可以更好地揭示和理解有關的經(jīng)濟社會現(xiàn)象。(4)總結和提煉出“理論基點和價值共識”及“理論互補性”分別作為理論綜合的預期“成本”和“收益”。并從科學哲學的角度理解新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學研究范式融合的意義。本文的不足:本文的寫作和論證是基于作者所梳理和總結的新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學對交易方式、交易組織及制度的研究,對文獻的整理和把握還有待進一步加強,其邏輯分析結構并不一定嚴謹,分析的結構安排也有待于進一步完善。本文涉及問題的進一步研究方向:在理論邏輯上繼續(xù)完善新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的理論融合,并在此基礎上構建對交易、交易組織形成和變遷更為一般理論數(shù)理分析的框架。這一方面的研究可以從有約束的個人效用函數(shù)或偏好結構出發(fā),運用社會網(wǎng)絡的交易序?qū)緮?shù)理分析,并將其拓展到群體和社會一般分析;進一步從文獻梳理和總結出經(jīng)濟社會學以及新經(jīng)濟社會學兩個路向的學術研究傳統(tǒng)——社會學取向的經(jīng)濟社會學和經(jīng)濟學取向的經(jīng)濟社會學,并且更深入地研究經(jīng)濟學取向的新經(jīng)濟社會學和新制度經(jīng)濟學(考慮制度約束的經(jīng)濟學)的內(nèi)在契合性,從而更深刻地理解經(jīng)濟學和社會學研究范式的異同;對于企業(yè)理論、家庭經(jīng)濟學、市場理論等理論,用新的綜合的交易組織制度分析方法研究其中諸如關系專用性投資,套牢問題,經(jīng)濟個體社會資本的積累,市場交易機制的屬性,企業(yè)理論中的有關內(nèi)容,金融保險安排,家庭的功能等具體問題,在交易組織制度分析的基礎上構建更為嚴謹?shù)睦碚擉w系,并加入適當?shù)陌咐治觥?/p>

    This paper is a theoretical study of basic analytical paradigm of economic and social problem, which mainly focuses on the comparative study of transaction, transaction organization and transaction institution of new institutional economics and new economic sociology. In the social sciences, especially in economics and sociology, there are a lot of researches on transaction, transaction organization and institution. In the 1970s and 1980s last century, new institutional economics and new economic sociology have boomed the studies of organization and institution to new height. However, new institutional economics and new economic sociology have similarities and differences in basic research methodology, the main theories, such as components and logic methods on both similarities and differences.To deal with the organization and institution, most studies focused on firm and market, and only few studies involved family or clan. Sociologic researches mainly study family from the perspective of social interaction and network and focus on the family as a social organization and its function of social cells. However, the family or clan in different historical stages and different countries has economic organizational function. And in different legal system and different cultural tradition and social norms, the role of family is not the same.This paper tries to build comprehensive theoretical framework—transaction organizational institutional analysis, by comparing and summarizing the basic methodology and theoretical system of the new institutional economics and the new economic sociology. In the study of transaction organizational institution-the family, the firm and the market-will be put into a unified and integrated analytical framework.The synthesis of this paper is to build a theoretical framework which is not able to promulgate the economy and the social relations, but also have the enough explanation to experience, as far as the study object is concerned. In order to carry on such attempt, we first need to seek a reflection economic society to relate, the packet of energy including the macrostructure factor and the microscopic motion factor’s analysis concept, which can enable these two kinds of factor analysis to be able to unify in one comprehensive basic methodology foundation.The paper’s research logic is: Abstracting the basic concept from the experience fact; then obtaining the elementary theory component; and then, through in new system economic and new economic sociology foundation conformability methodology innovation, establishing an analytical pathway; Finally, constructing a comprehensive economic society analysis method, namely transaction organizational institutional analysis.This paper compares and synthesizes research methodologies of the new institutional economics and the new economic sociology. In a wider range of social structure, this paper discusses the decision and transaction change and cultural beliefs and social way to transaction relationship and common evolution. In particular, in consideration of the individual choice on the basis of analysis of the transaction institution, we establish cultural beliefs of informal social transaction institution as the general framework structure, to understand and examine family, firm, market and the function of transaction and factors which decide the boundaries. In particular, the historical analysis, concern "self" and "the implementation of implementing" and "third party" contract implementation of each operation mechanism and mutual influence. Transaction institution is not simply taken as exogenous variables, which focuses on the formation and evolution of transaction institution and decision factors. Finally, the view of study will expand from market-oriented transaction institution to non-market oriented institution structure, from the institutional arrangements to institutional environment, from the economic, political, legal system, to the value of traditional cultural and ideological, especially to expand the influence factors of traditional culture system, values and ideology.The analytical structure is as follows: the first chapter is introduction; the second chapter is for the theory of new institutional economics. Through the survey of literatures, this chapter analyses the researches and developments of the new institutional economics and transactions of organization and institution. The third chapter is the review of new economic sociology theory. The fourth chapter is the comparison and synthesis of new institutional economics and the new economic sociology. The fifth chapter is a comprehensive analysis framework. In this chapter, I define the basic hypothesis, and research methodology and the analysis of the specific levels, and expounds theoretic foundations of the new institutional economics and the new economic sociology and states scientific philosophy meaning of discipline integration; The sixth chapter defines transaction institution of organization and the main properties of family, firm and market, building a risk sharing theory model. Chapter seven focuses on the embeddedness of economic behavior and the social construction of economic institution, and studies the old-age financial supportive system in China as an example. Chapter eight is the research prospect which discusses further development direction from two aspects of theory and application. Chapter night is the conclusion.The main points in this paper are:(1) Transaction, transaction organizations and transaction institution is the object of study which the social sciences pay attention to together. This article analyzes the concepts of transaction, the transaction organization and institution in the economic and sociological research category with focusing on their similarities and differences. Through the comparison and the synthesis, this research showed the opposition in two domains is not severe; moreover, this paper tries hard to build a unified analytical framework of new institutional economics and new economic sociology.(2) As to the synthesis of new institutional economics and the new sociology, this paper studies two theoretical paradigm integration foundation - the theoretical basis and value of consensus, as well as theoretical complementary to each other. And from the perspective of philosophy of science to understand the Synthesis between new institutional economics and new economic sociology as the two research system, it brought about the integration of "knowledge growth". The paradigm shift is brought about by integration is accordance with Kuhn’s art model, and not the scientific model. Therefore, there is no commensuration failure. In the social sciences, we can clearly see that the outcome of disputes is usually accepting the new theory but not completely destroyed and abandoned old paradigm, thus, it makes comprehensive analysis possibly.(3) Organizational and institutional forms such as firm, family and market, in accordance with their economic and social functions in the economics and sociology, as well as existing research, are distinguished from transaction costs (including transacting connection cost), transaction risk sharing (the main objective for the risk and uncertainty), default risk and contractual regulation characteristics.(4) In the comprehensive analysis framework of new institutional economics and new economic sociology, family, firm and market—transaction organization and institutional arrangement can be studied by the institutional analysis of transaction organization which is based on the transaction cost and specific cultural tradition of individual preference. Transaction costs and cultural tradition of the individual preference for transaction determines the choice in the organizational institution, the primary transaction (basic, affordable and Maslow’ s hierarchy of needs of low sense of transaction demand) should be made by the transaction cost of leading transaction organization system, and in subprime transaction can make full consideration in cultural tradition and social customs under the influence of individual preference. Based on the transaction cost of primary transaction organization institutional arrangement of the effectiveness of individual preference, individual savings in the secondary transactions have ability to select more individual subjective preferences containing the organizational institution. Under this circumstance, subprime transaction has even more efficiency than primary one.The main innovation of this study: (1) From the combination of micro-level consideration of individual choice and the embedded social network analysis, the study of social structure and economic efficiency of transactions, such as macro-level issues are considered; Building a general analytical framework for research.(2) In the case of transactions relating to specific issues, such as family-based reciprocal transactions, in areas such as economics and sociology are often analyzed separately from the economic factors, social factors, cultural factors, and this article seeks to set up an inter-disciplinary society integrated analytical framework to study the decision and the change of different social transaction structure.(3) Put the family, firm, market—specific transaction organizations into the cultural beliefs, such as non-formal institution and social study on the relationship between transaction institutions, thus it can better reveal and understand the economic situation.(4) Summarize and extract the "theoretical basis and value of consensus" and "theoretical complementarity of each other" as the expected "cost" and "benefit" of theoretical synthesis, and from the perspective of philosophy of science, to understand the significance of the synthesis of new institutional economics and new sociology.The deficiency of this paper lies in: the logic structure of this paper may not be precise due to its basing on a framework which the author summarizes himself, and the arrangement of this paper also needs to be perfected further. Besides, those arguments for the practical applications of the theories need to be strengthened in this paper.The further study involves: deepening the logic framework. Research in this area is bound from the individual utility function or preference structure, the use of social networks, transaction sequence of basic mathematical analysis, and extended to groups and society in general analysis; further summarized Economic Sociology new economic sociology, as well as two streams of academic research traditions from the literature, and thus a deeper understanding of economics and sociological research paradigm of the similarities and differences is possible; For enterprise theory, family economics, the market research, try to build a more precise theoretical system on the basis of institutional analysis of transaction organization to further those theory study such as relationship-specific investments, hold-up problem, the economy of individual accumulation of social capital, the market mechanism for property transactions, business theory, the relevant content, finance and insurance arrangements, meanwhile, add some appropriate case study.

新制度經(jīng)濟學與新經(jīng)濟社會學的比較及綜合：交易組織制度分析

中文摘要11-16Abstract16-21第一章 引言22-29    第一節(jié) 研究的背景與問題的提出22-26        一、早期經(jīng)濟學和社會學的交叉研究22-24        二、新經(jīng)濟社會學的產(chǎn)生24-25        三、進一步的理論綜合為什么可能?25-26    第二節(jié) 本文的研究思路和分析方法26-27    第三節(jié) 本文的主要內(nèi)容和分析結構27-28    第四節(jié) 本文的主要觀點和可能的創(chuàng)新之處28-29第二章 新制度經(jīng)經(jīng)濟學的研究體系評述29-48    第一節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學對交易、交易組織和制度的研究綜述29-34    第二節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學理論的基本構件34-41        一、新制度經(jīng)濟學的基本方法論34-35        二、基本假設35-37        三、新制度經(jīng)濟學的基本理論工具37-38        四、新制度經(jīng)濟學的主要理論體系38-41    第三節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學的研究范式41-44        一、作為新古典經(jīng)濟學的繼承和發(fā)展的新制度經(jīng)濟學41-44        二、新制度經(jīng)濟學與舊制度經(jīng)濟學的關系44    第四節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學研究的一些評析44-48        一、新制度經(jīng)濟學的理論貢獻44-45        二、新制度經(jīng)濟學的研究缺陷45-48第三章 新經(jīng)濟社會學的研究體系評述48-68    第一節(jié) 新經(jīng)濟社會學對交易和交易結構的研究綜述48-52        一、社會交換理論:交易問題的社會學基礎48-49        二、社會角色理論:社會心理學對交易者身份的研究49-50        三、嵌入理論:經(jīng)濟社會學的新的分析視角50-52    第二節(jié) 新經(jīng)濟社會學理論的基本構件52-61        一、新經(jīng)濟社會學的研究方法52-54        二、基本假設54-56        三、新經(jīng)濟社會學的基本理論分析工具56-61    第三節(jié) 新經(jīng)濟社會學的研究范式61-63        一、作為經(jīng)濟社會學范式化的新經(jīng)濟社會學61-62        二、新經(jīng)濟社會學和新古典經(jīng)濟學研究范式的關系62-63    第四節(jié) 對新經(jīng)濟社會學研究的有關評析63-68        一、新經(jīng)濟社會學的理論貢獻63-64        二、新經(jīng)濟社會學的研究缺陷64-68第四章 新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學研究體系的比較及綜合68-87    第一節(jié) 關于交易、交易組織和制度的概念分析69-70    第二節(jié) 新經(jīng)濟社會學中的社會網(wǎng)絡理論70-74    第三節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學中的交易成本理論74-76    第四節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學研究體系的比較及綜合76-82        一、兩種研究體系的差別和比較76-78        二、兩種研究體系的通約和綜合78-82    第五節(jié) 經(jīng)濟學和社會學中的新制度主義82-85    第六節(jié) 本章小結85-87第五章 交易組織制度分析:一個綜合的研究視角87-108    第一節(jié) 交易的定義和分類87-91    第二節(jié) 新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學融合的學理基礎91-98        一、新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學的互補性和契合性91-93        二、新制度經(jīng)濟學和新經(jīng)濟社會學融合的科學哲學思考93-98    第三節(jié) 一個綜合的分析視角—交易組織制度分析98-105        一、基本概念98-99        二、基本假設99-102        三、基本研究方法102-105    第四節(jié) 交易組織制度的中間層次社會網(wǎng)絡分析105-106    第五節(jié) 交易組織制度的微觀層次分析106    第六節(jié) 交易組織制度的宏觀歷史和社會分析106-108第六章 作為交易組織和規(guī)制制度的家庭、企業(yè)及市場108-120    第一節(jié) 交易組織的契約性質(zhì)108-109    第二節(jié) 交易成本、交易聯(lián)結成本和交易形式109-110    第三節(jié) 風險分擔和交易組織110-112    第四節(jié) 違約風險:正式和非正式制度的不同規(guī)制作用112-114    第五節(jié) 引入違約風險的風險分擔網(wǎng)絡模型114-120        一、只考慮家庭內(nèi)交易的理論模型(單一組織模型)114-116        二、考慮家庭之間的交易(或市場交易的產(chǎn)生)的理論模型(兩組織模型)116-120第七章 文化傳統(tǒng)影響下的交易組織制度選擇問題120-145    第一節(jié) 文化傳統(tǒng)、制度環(huán)境和交易組織制度的選擇120-123    第二節(jié) 經(jīng)濟行為的文化嵌入性和經(jīng)濟制度的社會構建123-128        一、經(jīng)濟行為的文化嵌入性124-126        二、經(jīng)濟制度的社會構建126-127        三、從網(wǎng)絡嵌入性到關系網(wǎng)絡和制度的雙重嵌入性127-128    第三節(jié) 文化和社會網(wǎng)絡、經(jīng)濟制度的產(chǎn)生及變遷128-131    第四節(jié) 中國和西方傳統(tǒng)文化差異下的交易組織制度分析131-138        一、新古典研究范式的基本方法論與中國傳統(tǒng)文化精神存在沖突134-135        二、從家庭推衍出來的交易組織結構135-136        三、不同文化傳統(tǒng)對經(jīng)濟交易的不同規(guī)制136-138    第五節(jié) 一個應用:中國傳統(tǒng)文化影響下的養(yǎng)老制度安排138-145        一、儒家倫理和交易聯(lián)結的差序結構138-140        二、儒家文化和家庭養(yǎng)老的規(guī)制方式140-141        三、家庭的風險分擔和養(yǎng)老安排效率141-142        四、正式制度和非正式制度的交互效應對養(yǎng)老安排的影響142-145第八章 研究展望145-152    第一節(jié) 經(jīng)濟學和社會學研究范式的進一步融合145-146    第二節(jié) 研究交易和交易制度的兩個維度—歷史和社會146-148    第三節(jié) 對中國經(jīng)濟社會現(xiàn)象的進一步應用研究方向148-152第九章 結論152-154參考文獻154-167后記(致謝)167-168攻讀學位期間發(fā)表的論文目錄168-169學位論文評閱及答辯情況表169

  本文關鍵詞：新制度經(jīng)濟學與新經(jīng)濟社會學的比較及綜合：交易組織制度分析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。