本文選題：生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng) + 服務(wù)的虛構(gòu)價(jià)值��； 參考：《當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究》2017年09期

【摘要】："什么是生產(chǎn)性勞動(dòng)"這個(gè)問(wèn)題已經(jīng)困擾了日本學(xué)界70余年,其肇始于"國(guó)民收入與生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)"的關(guān)系論爭(zhēng),并先后經(jīng)歷了"服務(wù)勞動(dòng)是否創(chuàng)造價(jià)值","一切勞動(dòng)都是服務(wù)勞動(dòng)嗎"等論戰(zhàn)。造成這一論爭(zhēng)的根本原因是資本的神秘化導(dǎo)致的國(guó)民收入論潛藏的分配論的錯(cuò)誤,即對(duì)社會(huì)而言本來(lái)是非生產(chǎn)性的勞動(dòng)卻被個(gè)別資本家看作是生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)。而且,這一觀念造成了國(guó)民收入論的兩大不合理性,其將交換層面的范疇當(dāng)作了生產(chǎn)范疇,從而將不創(chuàng)造價(jià)值的經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)獲得的收入當(dāng)成了價(jià)值的來(lái)源,這助長(zhǎng)了建立在"三位一體公式"基礎(chǔ)上的庸俗經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的神秘化理念。正是因?yàn)椴粍?chuàng)造價(jià)值的經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)在分配層面上獲得了收入,所以本來(lái)不創(chuàng)造價(jià)值的商業(yè)勞動(dòng)和保險(xiǎn)勞動(dòng)等被當(dāng)作了創(chuàng)造價(jià)值的勞動(dòng),分配的邏輯導(dǎo)致了生產(chǎn)邏輯的神秘化。
[Abstract]:"What is productive labor" has plagued the Japanese academic circle for more than 70 years. It began in the debate on the relationship between "national income and production labor", and has experienced the controversy of "whether service labor creates value" and "all labor is service labor". The root cause of this controversy is the national collection caused by the mystifying of capital. The mistake of the latent distributive theory, that is, the original non productive labor for the society is regarded as productive labor by individual capitalists. Moreover, this concept causes the two unrationality of the theory of national income, which regards the category of the exchange level as the category of production, thus making the income of the economic activities that do not create value as the income. The source of value contributes to the mystifying of the vulgar economics established on the basis of the "Trinity Formula". It is precisely because the economic activity that does not create value gains income at the level of distribution, so the commercial labor and insurance labor, which did not create value, are regarded as the labor of creating value, and the logic of distribution leads to The mystifying of the logic of production.

【作者單位】： 日本國(guó)一橋大學(xué);
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F014

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 關(guān)柏春;王博;;對(duì)“非勞收入論”的幾點(diǎn)商榷意見(jiàn)[J];吉林工商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1831156