本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于所有制形式的中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)上市企業(yè)技術(shù)效率分析　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 房地產(chǎn)上市企業(yè) DEA 所有制 經(jīng)營(yíng)效率

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)業(yè)是國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的重要產(chǎn)業(yè)，不僅對(duì)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展有重要推動(dòng)作用，還對(duì)社會(huì)民生有重大影響。從1998年取消福利分房制度以來，房地產(chǎn)業(yè)取得了飛速的發(fā)展，吸引了大量的資金，包括國(guó)有資金、國(guó)內(nèi)私有資金和境外資金。經(jīng)過多年的發(fā)展，，培育了一批規(guī)模龐大的房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)；2013年銷售額超過1000億元的房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)有7家之多，這類企業(yè)的經(jīng)營(yíng)效率到底如何值得探討。對(duì)這些企業(yè)的經(jīng)營(yíng)效率的研究，特別是不同所有制形式的房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)，具有理論上和現(xiàn)實(shí)上的緊迫性、必要性。 本文的第三章利用全國(guó)商品房銷售情況、房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)企業(yè)情況歷年數(shù)據(jù)分析了全國(guó)房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的基本情況，利用赫爾芬達(dá)爾赫希曼指數(shù)重點(diǎn)分析了中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的市場(chǎng)集中度；研究表明，2012年末，全國(guó)房地產(chǎn)業(yè)行業(yè)集中度CR8為9.1%，屬于競(jìng)爭(zhēng)型，但是歷年的行業(yè)集中度在減小。在本文的第四章，對(duì)中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)效率進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析，根據(jù)房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)控股主體所有制形式將房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)分為國(guó)有控股、境內(nèi)自然人控股、境外自然人控股、無(wú)控股主體四類，選取了31家上市房地產(chǎn)公司歷年的年報(bào)數(shù)據(jù)，共211個(gè)決策單元，利用BC2-DEA模型和超效率DEA模型，對(duì)四類房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)效率進(jìn)行了2012年截面數(shù)據(jù)分析和時(shí)間序列上的動(dòng)態(tài)變化分析，詳細(xì)分析了四類企業(yè)在技術(shù)效率、純技術(shù)效率、規(guī)模效率等方面的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，國(guó)有控股企業(yè)的技術(shù)效率和純技術(shù)效率最低，但是規(guī)模效率較高；境外自然人控股企業(yè)的技術(shù)效率僅高于國(guó)有控股企業(yè)，但是純技術(shù)效率較高，規(guī)模效率最�。痪硟�(nèi)自然人控股企業(yè)、無(wú)控股主體企業(yè)的技術(shù)效率較好，兩者比較接近，但前者的規(guī)模效率較低，需要適當(dāng)控制企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)規(guī)模。
[Abstract]:The real estate industry is an important industry of the national economy, not only has an important role in promoting the development of national economy, but also have a significant impact on the livelihood of the people. Since the abolition of the welfare housing system in 1998, the real estate industry has achieved rapid development, attracting a large number of funds, including state-owned capital, domestic private funds and foreign funds after. After years of development, cultivate a large number of real estate companies; in 2013 sales of more than 100 billion yuan of real estate enterprises is 7, the operating efficiency of the enterprise in the end how worthy of study. Study on the operating efficiency of these enterprises, especially the different forms of ownership of real estate enterprises, it is urgent and the theoretical and practical necessity.
In the third chapter, using the national commercial housing sales data, real estate development enterprises over the years, analyzes the basic situation of the real estate industry, analyzes the Chinese real estate market concentration using the Herr Finn Dahl Hirshman index key; research shows that at the end of 2012, the national real estate industry concentration is 9.1% CR8, which belongs to the type of competition. But over the years the industry concentration decreased. In the fourth chapter, the China real estate business efficiency of listed companies by empirical analysis, according to the real estate enterprises holding the main form of ownership of real estate will be divided into state-owned enterprises, domestic natural person holding foreign natural person holding, without holding the main four categories selected the 31 listed Real Estate Company annual report data, a total of 211 decision-making units, using the BC2-DEA model and the super efficiency DEA model, four types of real estate business efficiency The dynamic changes of 2012 sectional data analysis and time series analysis, a detailed analysis of the four types of enterprises in the technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency and other aspects of differences and relations. The study found that the minimum technical efficiency of state-owned holding enterprises and pure technical efficiency, but the scale efficiency is higher; the technical efficiency of foreign natural person holding enterprises the only higher than the state-owned enterprises, but the pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency minimum; domestic natural person holding enterprises, technical efficiency without holding the main business is good, but they are close to the size of the efficiency of the former is relatively low, need to properly control the scale of operation enterprises.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F273.1;F299.233.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏權(quán)齡,李宏余;決策單元的變更對(duì)DEA有效性的影響[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1991年01期

2 趙惠芳;劉曼;潘立生;;股權(quán)激勵(lì)對(duì)公司投資效率影響的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2010年18期

3 孟雙武;;上市公司現(xiàn)金持有水平對(duì)投資行為影響研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2011年02期

4 王偉;;重慶房地產(chǎn)投資產(chǎn)出效率實(shí)證研究[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

5 王家庭;趙亮;;我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)上市公司的技術(shù)效率測(cè)度及影響因素的實(shí)證研究[J];城市;2011年01期

6 王婷;王剛;;我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)運(yùn)行效率實(shí)證分析[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2009年10期

7 吳廣謀，朱喬，盛昭瀚;相對(duì)有效控制概念及其應(yīng)用[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1994年06期

8 王金祥;;基于超效率DEA模型的交叉效率評(píng)價(jià)方法[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2009年06期

9 周陽(yáng)敏;;房地產(chǎn)中央企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)效率研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年07期

10 周頤;陳艷麗;;房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)的規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)分析[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2009年03期

本文編號(hào)：1418839