【摘要】：Samarkand is a city in modern-day Uzbekistan and is one of the oldest inhabited cities in Central Asia.There is evidence of human activity in the area of the city from the late Paleolithic era,though there is no direct evidence of when exactly Samarkand proper was founded;some theories are that it was founded between the 8th and 7th centuries BC.Prospering from its location on the Silk Road between China and the Mediterranean,at times Samarkand was one of the greatest cities of Central Asia.The city is noted for being an Islamic Centre for scholarly study.In the 14 th century it became the capital of the empire of Timur(Tamerlane)and is the site of his mausoleum(the Gur-e Amir).The Bibi-Khanym Mosque(a modern replica)remains one of the city's most notable landmarks.The Registan was the ancient center of the city.The city has carefully preserved the traditions of ancient crafts: embroidery,gold embroidery,silk weaving,engraving on copper,ceramics,carving and painting on wood.The major monuments include the Registan mosque and madrasahs,originally built in mud brick and covered with decorated ceramic tiles,the Bibi-Khanum Mosque and Mausoleum,the Shakhi-Zinda compound which contains a series of mosques,madrasahs and mausoleum,and the ensembles of Gur-Emir and Rukhabad,as well as the remains of Ulugh-Bek's Observatory.The Registan Square is a real gem located in the very heart of the ancient city of Samarkand.It has gained its worldwide fame thanks to the great architectural ensemble that has become a monument of the oriental architecture.From three sides,the square is surrounded with grand madrassah,portals of which are facing the center of the space.All three erections have their own unique décor.It is by virtue of these buildings,preserved on the territory of the city,Samarkand was included in the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2001.The aim of this research work is to assess and discuss the strategies employed or adopted in Architectural heritage conservation of buildings/structures of Registan Square in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan;with a view of identifying,evaluating and ranking the conservation strategies affecting buildings/structures in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan.The data used for this research work consist of Primary sources of data and Secondary sources of data.The Secondary sources of data such as journals,conference/seminar/workshop papers,text books,newspapers,magazines and the internet etc.was used to review literatures to help in identifying the preservation / conservation strategies of Registan Square.These formed the main body of the research questionnaire.The Primary source of data for this research was obtained by administering the questionnaire to seek the opinions,perceptions and perspectives of the various stakeholders within this Area.A physical observation and inspection of the buildings under study was employed in this work.All Structures of architectural heritage,by their very nature and history(material and assembly),present a number of challenges in diagnosis and restoration that limit the application of modern legal codes and building standards.The obligation to conserve the architectural heritage of our local communities is as important as our duty to conserve the significant built heritage and its values or traditions of previous eras.More than ever,architectural heritage everywhere is at risk from a lack of appreciation,experience and care.Some have already been lost and more are in danger.It is a living heritage and it is essential to understand define,interpret and manage it well for future generations.This research work identified,evaluated / assessed and ranked ten conservation strategies used in the conservation of Registan Square as a Heritage in Samarkand city of Uzbekistan.These strategies were Redesign,Remodeling,Restoration,Renovation,Rehabilitation Reconstruction,Re-creation,Refacing,Rejuvenation and Reinvigoration.The data obtained were from 200 number of questionnaires distributed,out of which 83 number(41.5%)were not returned;while 117 number(58.5%)were returned.This shows that the response was good.Conservation strategies such as Re-facing,Remodeling,Restoration,Renovation,and Redesign are the top five that have ease of implementation,most effective with very good performance in the conservation of Registan square.Reconstruction / Rebuild,Rejuvenation followed these as the next important conservation strategies.Reinvigoration,Recreate and Rehabilitation are the bottom three strategies with least ranking in terms of ease of implementation,effectiveness and performances in the conservation of Registan square.In the overall analysis,all the ten Conservation strategies have an above average ranking in terms of ease of implementation,effectives and good performances in the conservation of Registan square.The test of the research hypotheses rejected the null hypothesis and accepted the alternative hypothesis,which states,“Architectural heritage conservation strategies employed / adopted in Registan Square in Samarkand have significant impact on the buildings/structures in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan”.These clearly indicates that these outlined ten conservation strategies adopted and employed in the conservation of Registan Square as Architectural heritage in the ancient Samarkand,Uzbekistan have significant impact in terms of ease of implementation,effectiveness and performances in the conservation of Registan square.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2018
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU-87

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 Dong Zhiwen;Wang Ying;;Research on the Protection of World Heritage in China[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2017年07期

2 王櫻燁;;The significance of protecting intangible cultural heritage[J];校園英語(yǔ);2019年09期

3 彼得·斯通;;Protecting cultural heritage as an ambassador for peace[J];長(zhǎng)江文化論叢;2017年00期

4 Sudeshna Sarkar;;The Common Thread[J];Beijing Review;2016年49期

5 Ji Jing;;Traces of the Past[J];Beijing Review;2016年50期

6 王Ze約;;The Ownership of Heritage Area with the Conservation Management Apporach——Taking Tianzifang and The Rock as Case Studies[J];環(huán)球市場(chǎng)信息導(dǎo)報(bào);2016年34期

7 程艷;李賀;;西藏現(xiàn)代公共文化服務(wù)體系中的藏戲傳承（英文）[J];China's Ethnic Groups;2016年06期

8 Fran?ois Dubé;;Crossing Cultural Borders[J];ChinAfrica;2017年01期

9 Fran?ois Dubé;;Crossing Cultural Borders[J];Beijing Review;2017年Z1期

10 Nancy Byrd Turner;;愛(ài)國(guó)的人[J];新高考(英語(yǔ)進(jìn)階);2016年11期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 Jean-Louis Luxen;;人類(lèi)可持續(xù)發(fā)展中的綜合性保護(hù)(英文)[A];北京論壇（2007）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類(lèi)文明的多元發(fā)展模式：“人類(lèi)遺產(chǎn)對(duì)文明進(jìn)步的啟示”考古分論壇論文或摘要集[C];2007年

2 ;Preservation of earthen heritage sites on the Silk Road,northwest China from the impact of the environment[A];中國(guó)科學(xué)院地質(zhì)與地球物理研究所第11屆（2011年度）學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集(中)[C];2012年

3 蘇迪德;;(Industrial) Heritage that Hurts:European Approaches to our Dark Pasts[A];地理學(xué)核心問(wèn)題與主線——中國(guó)地理學(xué)會(huì)2011年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨中國(guó)科學(xué)院新疆生態(tài)與地理研究所建所五十年慶典論文摘要集[C];2011年

4 H.Detlef Kammeier;;文化與自然遺產(chǎn)的管理:條件、需求、管理計(jì)劃和實(shí)施(英文)[A];北京論壇（2007）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類(lèi)文明的多元發(fā)展模式：“人類(lèi)遺產(chǎn)對(duì)文明進(jìn)步的啟示”考古分論壇論文或摘要集[C];2007年

5 ;World Heritage Classification and Related Issues—A Case Study of the“Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage”[A];文明的和諧與共同繁榮：人類(lèi)文明的多元發(fā)展模式——北京論壇（2007）論文選集[C];2007年

6 ;Sport Industry Internationalizing Management With Strategic Human Resource Administration[A];第4屆全國(guó)青年體育科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];2005年

7 William Chapman;;瀕危的遺產(chǎn)——亞洲和太平洋地區(qū)的城市和城鎮(zhèn)(英文)[A];北京論壇（2007）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類(lèi)文明的多元發(fā)展模式：“人類(lèi)遺產(chǎn)對(duì)文明進(jìn)步的啟示”考古分論壇論文或摘要集[C];2007年

8 Mohammad Rafique Mughal;;在亞洲變遷的政治和社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)背景下人類(lèi)遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)面臨的挑戰(zhàn):沖突、局限和妥協(xié)(英文)[A];北京論壇（2007）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類(lèi)文明的多元發(fā)展模式：“人類(lèi)遺產(chǎn)對(duì)文明進(jìn)步的啟示”考古分論壇論文或摘要集[C];2007年

9 Neville Agnew;;中國(guó)的文化遺產(chǎn)教育(英文)[A];北京論壇（2007）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類(lèi)文明的多元發(fā)展模式：“人類(lèi)遺產(chǎn)對(duì)文明進(jìn)步的啟示”考古分論壇論文或摘要集[C];2007年

10 Cheng Ping;;Conservation of Industrial Cultural Heritage during Industrial Modernization[A];Modernization Science Newsletter(Vol.5,NO.3 September 2015)[C];2015年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院環(huán)境與發(fā)展研究中心 徐嵩齡;應(yīng)將大運(yùn)河視為系列遺產(chǎn)[N];中國(guó)文物報(bào);2007年

2 譯 袁林君　校 王運(yùn)良;什么是遺產(chǎn)？[N];中國(guó)文物報(bào);2013年

3 燕海鳴 美國(guó)弗吉尼亞大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)系;“遺產(chǎn)化”中的話語(yǔ)和記憶[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2011年

4 本報(bào)記者 姚曉丹;重視保護(hù)沖突地區(qū)文化遺產(chǎn)[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2016年

5 特約記者 浦丹丹;經(jīng)典重溫,瞻前顧后[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 侯松;文化話語(yǔ)視域中的遺產(chǎn)建構(gòu)與重構(gòu)[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

2 麗莎（Mara Lisa Arizaga）;貴德瓊毛寺的沃摩隆仁唐卡研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

3 呂曉斌;基于產(chǎn)權(quán)視角的自然文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué);2013年

4 卜琳;中國(guó)文化遺產(chǎn)展示體系研究[D];西北大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 馬孫（VINCENDEAU MAXIME GERARD JEAN）;[D];西北大學(xué);2018年

2 ANVAR SAFAROV NORMATOVICH（安華）;烏茲別克斯坦撒馬爾罕古城雷吉斯坦廣場(chǎng)的建筑遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)[D];東南大學(xué);2018年

3 林釵;《應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)年度述評(píng)（2015）》第六篇和第九篇漢譯實(shí)踐報(bào)告[D];西北師范大學(xué);2018年

4 戴越;《遺產(chǎn)旅游符號(hào)學(xué)》術(shù)語(yǔ)漢譯實(shí)踐報(bào)告[D];浙江大學(xué);2017年

5 王明靜;世界自然文化遺產(chǎn)解說(shuō)漢譯英失誤分析[D];華中科技大學(xué);2005年

6 吳艷華;中國(guó)傳承的重新定位——《灶神之妻》后殖民解讀[D];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué);2004年

7 王文杰;《保護(hù)我們的文化資產(chǎn)—文化遺產(chǎn)部門(mén)的研究計(jì)劃》翻譯項(xiàng)目報(bào)告[D];四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2013年

8 張曉琴;《以羅杰巧克力有限公司與維多利亞市地方當(dāng)局案件為例談古建筑的非自愿認(rèn)定及其保護(hù)》翻譯報(bào)告[D];四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院;2012年

9 王文婧;《發(fā)展中國(guó)家的文化遺產(chǎn)與旅游》（節(jié)選）英譯漢翻譯實(shí)踐研究報(bào)告[D];西北大學(xué);2017年

10 陳潔坊;探究轉(zhuǎn)化學(xué)習(xí)：遺產(chǎn)研究課中小組學(xué)習(xí)的民族志[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2605421