【摘要】：廣州、香港、澳門(mén)由于其獨(dú)特的地緣特征,是中國(guó)近代城市與西方文化互動(dòng),以及中國(guó)現(xiàn)代城市化進(jìn)程起始的代表性城市�，F(xiàn)代性與歷史性并存的特征使得東西方城市文化的矛盾沖突以及城市特色的趨同性危機(jī)在穗港澳三城的發(fā)展過(guò)程中體現(xiàn)的尤為明顯,而歷史城區(qū)又是觀察與探討城市特色問(wèn)題的理想研究地,所以本文在穗港澳三城中選擇具有代表性的城市歷史環(huán)境作為研究對(duì)象,以場(chǎng)所精神理論中的環(huán)境特性作為解讀城市特色的切入點(diǎn)來(lái)展開(kāi)研究。穗港澳三城都具有同脈相承的東方地域文化語(yǔ)境和高密度發(fā)展的商都特征,而與西方文化不同的交融方式和不同的發(fā)展契機(jī)為三城賦予了和而不同的城市性格,對(duì)三城進(jìn)行比較研究,既能從個(gè)性上精準(zhǔn)描述構(gòu)成三城城市特色的歷史環(huán)境特性,也能從共性上深入探討東方城市文化在當(dāng)代城市化進(jìn)程中的傳承與延續(xù)。本文分別從歷史圖像、城市建筑、市民生活、城市管理四種視野展開(kāi)研究,構(gòu)建了相互補(bǔ)充的比較研究框架。歷史圖像視野中對(duì)歷史中的三城環(huán)境意象進(jìn)行了圖像學(xué)梳理,希望能夠在歷史大潮中尋覓出現(xiàn)存歷史環(huán)境的前世印跡；城市建筑視野的研究以基于建筑學(xué)的研究方法,通過(guò)對(duì)研究對(duì)象的登錄及分析,目的在于建構(gòu)出一個(gè)穗港澳三城的歷史環(huán)境特性框架,并通過(guò)對(duì)特性要素的類(lèi)型學(xué)分析得到城市特色構(gòu)建的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與規(guī)律；市民生活視野借鑒了社會(huì)學(xué)相關(guān)研究方法,用以描述市民眼中的城市特色組成,從人本角度對(duì)三城歷史環(huán)境特性進(jìn)行了追問(wèn),以構(gòu)成對(duì)城市建筑視野的比較型反思,并進(jìn)一步進(jìn)行了關(guān)于場(chǎng)所精神內(nèi)涵的拓展思考；城市管理視野以文獻(xiàn)分析作為主要方法,從城市風(fēng)貌管理相關(guān)的法規(guī)文件對(duì)三城歷史環(huán)境特性形成的影響進(jìn)行比較,力圖能夠說(shuō)明三城現(xiàn)狀環(huán)境特性背后的城市管理客觀管控因素。在對(duì)穗港澳三城的歷史環(huán)境特性進(jìn)行差異性比較的基礎(chǔ)上,本文對(duì)三城歷史環(huán)境的共性進(jìn)行了總結(jié),城市建筑方面而言三城有著高密度建設(shè)和高強(qiáng)度使用的基礎(chǔ)共性；市民生活方面而言人情空間和多義場(chǎng)所是三城本質(zhì)上的公共生活載體；價(jià)值取向方面而言重商務(wù)實(shí)的致用精神帶來(lái)的是開(kāi)放融通的商都氛圍；文化訴求方面而言敢于創(chuàng)新又忠于傳承的審美傾向引出的是法無(wú)定法,不拘一格的大美。進(jìn)一步凝煉,三城的城市精神內(nèi)核可謂是血脈中的人情味、骨子里的東方性。本文在比較研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,吸收香港、澳門(mén)的城市經(jīng)驗(yàn),為未來(lái)廣州歷史環(huán)境特色營(yíng)造形成了四點(diǎn)建議：第一,在完善保存型保護(hù)的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步推進(jìn)復(fù)興型保護(hù)；第二,在遵循實(shí)體的完整性基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步構(gòu)建場(chǎng)所的完整性；第三,在建設(shè)人性空間的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步復(fù)興人情空間；第四,在營(yíng)造城市地域性特色的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步深挖東方性。希望借由以上策略在廣州未來(lái)的歷史城區(qū)保護(hù)和城市特色營(yíng)造工作中再創(chuàng)地域文化的高峰,復(fù)興嶺南文化的輝煌,找到當(dāng)代高密度城市語(yǔ)境下的東方文化傳承之道。
[Abstract]:As a result of its unique geographical characteristics, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Macao are the typical urban and western cultural interaction of modern Chinese cities, as well as the representative cities in the beginning of the process of modern urbanization in China. The characteristics of the coexistence of the modernity and the history make the conflict of the East and West urban culture and the same-sex crisis of the city characteristic manifest in the development of the three cities of the ears and the Hong Kong and Macao, while the historical urban area is the ideal study to observe and explore the urban characteristics. In this paper, a representative urban historical environment is selected as the research object in the three cities of Guangzhou and Hong Kong and Macao, and the environmental characteristics of the place spirit theory are used as the entry point for the interpretation of the urban characteristics. The three cities of Hong Kong and Macao have the characteristics of the cultural context of the eastern region and the high-density development of the same vein, and the combination of the different ways of blending with the western culture and the different development opportunities have given the city and the different urban character to the three cities, and the three cities are compared and studied. It can not only accurately describe the characteristics of the historical environment that forms the characteristics of the three-city city, but also deeply discuss the inheritance and continuation of the East urban culture in the process of the contemporary urbanization. This paper studies the four fields of view from the history image, the city building, the citizen's life and the city management, and constructs a comparative study frame which is complementary to each other. In the view of history image, the image of the three-city environment image in the history is analyzed, and it is hoped that the former western blot of the existing historical environment can be found in the historical tide. The research of the visual field of the city is based on the research method of architecture, and through the login and analysis of the research object, The purpose of this paper is to construct a framework for the historical environment of the three cities of Hong Kong and Macao, and to obtain the experience and law of the construction of the city features through the typological analysis of the characteristics. From this point of view, the author makes a question of the characteristics of the three-city historical environment, so as to form a comparative reflection on the visual field of the city, and further the development of the spiritual connotation of the place; and the view of the city management is used as the main method in the literature analysis. The paper compares the influence of the legal documents related to the city style management on the characteristics of the three-city historical environment, and tries to explain the objective and control factors of the urban management behind the present environmental characteristics of the three cities. On the basis of the difference between the historical environmental characteristics of the three cities of the ears and the Hong Kong and Macao, this paper summarizes the commonness of the three-city historical environment, and the three cities have the basic characteristics of high-density construction and high-strength use. In terms of the life of the public, the human and multi-sense place is the public living carrier of the three-city nature. In terms of cultural demand, the aesthetic tendency of innovation and loyal to the inheritance is the method of law and law, which is not unique. Further, the city spirit core of the three cities is the human and the oriental in the blood. On the basis of the comparative research results, this paper absorbs the urban experience of Hong Kong and Macao, and forms four suggestions for the construction of the future of Guangzhou's historical environment: first, the renewal-type protection is further advanced on the basis of improving the conservation-type protection; secondly, The integrity of the place is further constructed on the basis of the integrity of the entity; thirdly, the human-human space is further redeveloped on the basis of building the human space; and fourthly, the oriental is further developed on the basis of building the regional characteristic of the city. It is hoped that the above strategy will create the peak of the regional culture in the future historical urban area protection and the urban feature creation in Guangzhou, to revive the glory of the Ling 'nan culture and to find the way to inherit the Eastern culture in the context of the contemporary high-density city.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU984.114

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方仁林;廣州城市景觀規(guī)劃構(gòu)思[J];城市規(guī)劃;1984年04期

2 劉奇志,肖志中,胡躍平;城市景觀體系規(guī)劃探討[J];城市規(guī)劃;2000年05期

3 袁壯兵;;澳門(mén)城市空間形態(tài)演變及其影響因素分析[J];城市規(guī)劃;2011年09期

4 嚴(yán)華;對(duì)城市景觀的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];城市問(wèn)題;2001年02期

5 蔣建國(guó);晚清廣州茶樓消費(fèi)的社會(huì)話語(yǔ)[J];船山學(xué)刊;2004年04期

6 方仁林;廣州城市形象規(guī)劃[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;1998年05期

7 李百浩;鄒涵;;香港城市化初期的城市規(guī)劃歷史研究(1841-1904年)[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2011年03期

8 鮑志成;從宗教建筑看中西文化在澳門(mén)的交融合璧和分流共存[J];東方博物;2005年01期

9 康慧東;;淺析宗教建筑外部空間的構(gòu)成要素[J];福建建筑;2009年07期

10 李百浩;彭昕;;廣州現(xiàn)代城市規(guī)劃發(fā)展及其范型的歷史研究[J];規(guī)劃師;2007年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 寧玲;城市景觀系統(tǒng)優(yōu)化原理研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

2 邢照華;西方宗教與清末民初廣州社會(huì)變遷（1835-1929）[D];暨南大學(xué);2007年

3 趙秀敏;杭州城市景觀網(wǎng)絡(luò)化體系研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年

4 楊鑫;地域性景觀設(shè)計(jì)理論研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

5 王瑜;外來(lái)建筑文化在嶺南的傳播及其影響研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2012年

6 鄭紅;潮州傳統(tǒng)建筑木構(gòu)彩畫(huà)研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 高海鵬;廣州市的騎樓及騎樓街[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2003年

2 陳小輝;城市歷史環(huán)境設(shè)計(jì)理論與方法[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

3 余漢平;探索與歷史環(huán)境對(duì)話的新景觀設(shè)計(jì)[D];重慶大學(xué);2006年

4 陳萍;歷史環(huán)境中的傳統(tǒng)建筑保護(hù)與再利用[D];東南大學(xué);2006年

5 聶毅寧;歷史名城局部形象要素與城市整體特色的關(guān)系初探[D];東南大學(xué);2005年

6 宋輝;黃河晉陜沿岸古城（鎮(zhèn)）商業(yè)街市空間形態(tài)研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2007年

7 王靈羽;城市特色街區(qū)的分類(lèi)體系與開(kāi)發(fā)模式研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年

8 鄒涵;1945年前香港近代城市規(guī)劃歷史研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

9 胥t，

本文編號(hào)：2417944