本文選題：發(fā)展中國(guó)家 + 對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)��； 參考：《貴州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：1995-2013年,全球共有42個(gè)國(guó)家或地區(qū)發(fā)起反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查或者采取反傾銷(xiāo)措施。其中,23個(gè)發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)起反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查631起,占世界對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)起反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查數(shù)量的63.80%;對(duì)中國(guó)采取反傾銷(xiāo)措施457起,占世界對(duì)中國(guó)采取反傾銷(xiāo)措施的63.74%。這說(shuō)明發(fā)展中國(guó)家已成為對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的主力軍。由于反傾銷(xiāo)對(duì)進(jìn)出口國(guó)的外貿(mào)均有不同的影響,因此研究發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)有重要的實(shí)踐意義。但是,目前的實(shí)證研究主要以歐美等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)為樣本,較少估計(jì)發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)。本文在現(xiàn)有的研究基礎(chǔ)上,以1995-2013年發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的數(shù)據(jù),分析發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的整體情況。結(jié)果顯示,從增長(zhǎng)看,1995-2013年發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)發(fā)起反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查數(shù)平均增長(zhǎng)16.40%,對(duì)中國(guó)采取反傾銷(xiāo)措施數(shù)平均增長(zhǎng)9.28%,均超過(guò)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的平均增長(zhǎng)率;從國(guó)別看,前5位對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的國(guó)家是印度、阿根廷、巴西、土耳其、墨西哥;從行業(yè)看,前6位被反傾銷(xiāo)的行業(yè)是普通金屬及制品,化學(xué)工業(yè)品,機(jī)器、電子設(shè)備及零件,玻璃及陶瓷制品,紡織品,塑膠產(chǎn)品。為檢驗(yàn)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng),本文采用1995-2012年阿根廷對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)品的反傾銷(xiāo)數(shù)據(jù),從貿(mào)易破壞效應(yīng)和轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)兩個(gè)方面,估算了阿根廷對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)。結(jié)果表明,反傾銷(xiāo)破壞效應(yīng)最大的是化學(xué)工業(yè)品;其次是普通金屬及制品、機(jī)器、電子設(shè)備及零件品和礦產(chǎn)品,而在車(chē)輛、飛機(jī)等運(yùn)輸設(shè)備,木制品和雜項(xiàng)制品方面的反傾銷(xiāo)貿(mào)易破壞效應(yīng)則不顯著。貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)最大的是化學(xué)工業(yè)品;其次是普通金屬及制品、機(jī)器、電子設(shè)備及零件品、木制品、車(chē)輛、飛機(jī)等運(yùn)輸設(shè)備、雜項(xiàng)制品、礦產(chǎn)品�；谏鲜龇治�,為改善中國(guó)在發(fā)展中國(guó)家市場(chǎng)中的貿(mào)易績(jī)效,本文認(rèn)為中國(guó)政府要加大對(duì)外貿(mào)易的宏觀調(diào)控力度,行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)則應(yīng)增強(qiáng)協(xié)調(diào)能力,而出口企業(yè)要提高經(jīng)營(yíng)管理水平,才能有效應(yīng)對(duì)發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)的反傾銷(xiāo)。
[Abstract]:From 1995 to 2013, 42 countries or regions in the world launched anti-dumping investigations or taken anti-dumping measures.Of these, 631 anti-dumping investigations were initiated against China by 23 developing countries, accounting for 63.80 per cent of the total number of anti-dumping investigations initiated against China in the world, while 457 anti-dumping measures were taken against China, accounting for 63.74 per cent of the anti-dumping measures taken against China in the world.This shows that developing countries have become the main force of anti-dumping against China.Since anti-dumping has different effects on the foreign trade of importing and exporting countries, it is of great practical significance to study the trade effect of developing countries on China.However, the current empirical studies are mainly based on developed countries such as Europe and the United States as a sample of anti-dumping against China, and less estimates of the trade effects of developing countries on China.Based on the existing research, this paper analyzes the whole situation of developing countries' anti-dumping against China based on the data of developing countries' anti-dumping against China from 1995 to 2013.The results show that the number of anti-dumping investigations initiated by developing countries against China from 1995 to 2013 increased by an average of 16.40 from 1995 to 2013, and the number of anti-dumping measures against China increased by an average of 9.28, which was higher than the average growth rate of anti-dumping against China by developed countries.The top five anti-dumping countries against China are India, Argentina, Brazil, Turkey and Mexico. In terms of industry, the top six anti-dumping industries are ordinary metals and products, chemical products, machinery, electronic equipment and parts.Glass and ceramic products, textiles, plastic products.In order to test the trade effect of antidumping, this paper estimates the trade effect of Argentine anti-dumping against China from two aspects of trade damage effect and transfer effect, using the data of Argentina's anti-dumping against Chinese products from 1995 to 2012.The results show that the most destructive effects of anti-dumping are chemical industrial products, followed by ordinary metals and products, machinery, electronic equipment and parts and minerals, and transport equipment such as vehicles, aircraft, etc.Wood products and miscellaneous products of anti-dumping trade damage effect is not significant.The largest effect of trade transfer was in chemical industry, followed by ordinary metals and products, machinery, electronic equipment and spare parts, wood products, vehicles, aircraft and other transport equipment, miscellaneous products, mineral products.Based on the above analysis, in order to improve China's trade performance in the markets of developing countries, this paper holds that the Chinese government should strengthen the macro-control of foreign trade, and the trade associations should enhance their coordination ability.In order to deal with the anti-dumping of developing countries against China, export enterprises should improve their management level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F752.02

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 平遠(yuǎn);;中國(guó)東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)的實(shí)證研究[J];商;2013年19期

2 李保明,劉震濤;臺(tái)商投資的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2004年03期

3 吳江;我國(guó)外商直接投資貿(mào)易效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)金貿(mào)易;2000年09期

4 熊涓,官建成;中國(guó)外商投資企業(yè)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)分析[J];求是學(xué)刊;2005年04期

5 陳龍江;;匯率變動(dòng)的農(nóng)業(yè)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究述評(píng)[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村觀察;2009年05期

6 沈國(guó)兵;;單一起訴和多重起訴下美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng):經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)文匯;2011年06期

7 邢孝兵;徐潔香;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究方法及研究觀點(diǎn)綜述[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2008年05期

8 楊林燕;;中國(guó)企業(yè)投資非洲的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)實(shí)證研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年21期

9 葛飛秀;楊曉龍;;自由貿(mào)易區(qū)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究方法綜述[J];新疆財(cái)經(jīng);2011年05期

10 沈國(guó)兵;;顯性比較優(yōu)勢(shì)與美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)品反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 湛柏明;孟慶雷;;韓國(guó)對(duì)湖北投資的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)及提升方案:基于行業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù)的分析[A];“外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)與當(dāng)代世界經(jīng)濟(jì)”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)暨中華外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)研究會(huì)第20次學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

2 沈國(guó)兵;;美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng):單一起訴與多重起訴情形[A];中國(guó)貿(mào)易救濟(jì)與產(chǎn)業(yè)安全論叢（2010）——第六屆中國(guó)貿(mào)易救濟(jì)與產(chǎn)業(yè)安全研究獎(jiǎng)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募痆C];2010年

3 湛柏明;舒曼;李建國(guó);;美國(guó)經(jīng)常項(xiàng)目失衡與生產(chǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)[A];中華外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)研究會(huì)第19次年會(huì)暨外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)與國(guó)內(nèi)外經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展新格局（會(huì)議文集）[C];2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳艷林;外商在華直接投資集群化及其貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年

2 原瑞玲;自由貿(mào)易區(qū)農(nóng)產(chǎn)品貿(mào)易效應(yīng)及其測(cè)度研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 祁山舢;中國(guó)—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)對(duì)中國(guó)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2015年

2 王海霞;美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];北京理工大學(xué);2015年

3 馬云纏;中國(guó)對(duì)外移民的地理分布及貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

4 胡顯軍;中日韓自貿(mào)區(qū)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)及其影響分析[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

5 徐靈;中日FTA的服務(wù)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

6 宋成濤;中國(guó)自由貿(mào)易區(qū)出口貿(mào)易效應(yīng)實(shí)證分析[D];山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

7 吳露;中國(guó)—澳大利亞自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的貨物貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2016年

8 徐娟;基于引力模型的中國(guó)—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];南京大學(xué);2016年

9 楊曉茜;中國(guó)新疆與中亞五國(guó)外貿(mào)關(guān)系、影響因素及貿(mào)易效應(yīng)分析[D];新疆財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

10 張曼;發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)：理論分析與實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[D];貴州大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1756691