本文關(guān)鍵詞：貿(mào)易協(xié)定對(duì)知識(shí)溢出影響的實(shí)證研究　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 貿(mào)易協(xié)定 知識(shí)溢出 專利引用 社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析 引力模型

【摘要】：20紀(jì)90年代以來,經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)域化逐漸成為經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的主導(dǎo)趨勢(shì),區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定(RTA)數(shù)量增速加快。近年來,越來越多的學(xué)者加入到對(duì)貿(mào)易協(xié)定的研究當(dāng)中來,但現(xiàn)存的研究大多集中于貿(mào)易協(xié)定的靜態(tài)效應(yīng),比如貿(mào)易創(chuàng)造和貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移,關(guān)于貿(mào)易協(xié)定的動(dòng)態(tài)效應(yīng)的研究只在少數(shù)文獻(xiàn)中提及。貿(mào)易協(xié)議成為國(guó)家間社會(huì)關(guān)系動(dòng)態(tài)改變的一項(xiàng)重要表征,其對(duì)世界貿(mào)易格局的改變以及進(jìn)一步對(duì)知識(shí)溢出的影響越來越受到關(guān)注。本文主要對(duì)貿(mào)易協(xié)定對(duì)知識(shí)溢出的影響機(jī)制進(jìn)行推測(cè)和驗(yàn)證。在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,我們總結(jié)分析了貿(mào)易協(xié)定對(duì)知識(shí)溢出的影響機(jī)制,認(rèn)為貿(mào)易協(xié)定通過國(guó)家間社會(huì)距離的改變來影響他們之間的知識(shí)溢出。我們利用社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析方法來研究1991-2014年在世界貿(mào)易組織WTO登記的正在生效的貿(mào)易協(xié)定,并通過密度、中心性和核心邊緣分析三個(gè)維度來界定每個(gè)國(guó)家在全球區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的位置。我們發(fā)現(xiàn),由于貿(mào)易協(xié)定簽訂的熱潮,世界區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定呈現(xiàn)出以歐盟、北美和新崛起的東亞地區(qū)三足鼎立的網(wǎng)絡(luò)格局。在計(jì)量分析中,我們用專利的引用來追蹤知識(shí)溢出的軌跡,利用1991-2002年60個(gè)國(guó)家的專利引用面板數(shù)據(jù)構(gòu)建以一個(gè)引力模型。根據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)的特點(diǎn),我們構(gòu)建了零膨脹負(fù)二項(xiàng)模型,分兩步對(duì)貿(mào)易協(xié)定對(duì)知識(shí)溢出的影響進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證,研究結(jié)果表明：(1)在全球區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)中所處的協(xié)議強(qiáng)度越高的國(guó)家,他們之間的專利引用越高,也就是知識(shí)溢出效應(yīng)越明顯；(2)在美國(guó)專利商標(biāo)局被授予專利數(shù)量越高的國(guó)家,越傾向于和其他國(guó)家之間進(jìn)行專利引用,國(guó)家間的知識(shí)溢出效應(yīng)越強(qiáng)。這兩個(gè)結(jié)論從兩個(gè)角度證明了國(guó)家本身知識(shí)創(chuàng)新的能力和國(guó)家在國(guó)際貿(mào)易網(wǎng)絡(luò)中地位的高低,影響了其從知識(shí)溢出中獲利的能力。此外,研究還發(fā)現(xiàn),地理距離在一定程度上阻礙了知識(shí)在國(guó)家之間的溢出。
[Abstract]:Since 90s of the 20th century, economic regionalization has gradually become the dominant trend of economic globalization, and the number of regional trade agreements (RTAs) has increased rapidly in recent years. More and more scholars join in the study of trade agreements, but most of the existing studies focus on the static effects of trade agreements, such as trade creation and trade transfer. The research on the dynamic effects of trade agreements is only mentioned in a few literatures. Trade agreements have become an important symbol of the dynamic change of social relations between countries. More and more attention has been paid to the change of world trade pattern and the further influence on knowledge spillover. This paper mainly speculates and verifies the influence mechanism of trade agreement on knowledge spillover. On the basis of previous studies. We summarize and analyze the impact mechanism of trade agreements on knowledge spillover. It is believed that trade agreements affect knowledge spillover between countries through the change of social distance between them. We use the social network analysis method to study the positive registration of WTO in the World Trade Organization from 1991 to 2014. In force in a trade agreement. And through the density, centrality and core edge analysis of three dimensions to define each country in the global regional trade agreement network. World regional trade agreements (RTAs) show a three-pronged network pattern of EU, North America and emerging East Asia. In the econometric analysis, we use patent references to track the path of knowledge spillover. Based on the patent reference panel data of 60 countries from 1991 to 2002, a gravitational model is constructed. According to the characteristics of the data, we construct a zero expansion negative binomial model. In two steps to verify the impact of trade agreements on knowledge spillover, the results show that the higher the agreement intensity in the global regional trade agreement network, the higher the patent citation between them. That is, the more obvious the spillover effect of knowledge is; The higher the number of patents granted by the United States Patent Trademark Office, the more likely it is to make patent citations with other countries. These two conclusions prove the ability of knowledge innovation and the status of countries in the international trade network from two angles. In addition, it is found that geographical distance hinders the spillover of knowledge between countries to some extent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F744;F746

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 郝景芳;馬弘;;引力模型的新進(jìn)展及對(duì)中國(guó)對(duì)外貿(mào)易的檢驗(yàn)[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年10期

2 劉巖;;貿(mào)易流量引力模型的理論研究綜述[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)(對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年03期

3 向希堯;蔡虹;;全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)中企業(yè)創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略選擇研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2009年15期

4 向希堯;蔡虹;;無標(biāo)度網(wǎng)絡(luò)中FDI技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)[J];系統(tǒng)管理學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

5 向雅萍;;區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定對(duì)WTO體制的沖擊及改革方向[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2007年06期

6 楊中楷,孫玉濤;基于專利引用的國(guó)家技術(shù)力量指標(biāo)比較[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2005年10期

7 史朝興,顧海英;貿(mào)易引力模型研究新進(jìn)展及其在中國(guó)的應(yīng)用[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2005年03期

8 林玲,王炎;貿(mào)易引力模型對(duì)中國(guó)雙邊貿(mào)易的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)和政策含義[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1430992