本文關(guān)鍵詞：歐盟對(duì)華瓷磚反傾銷(xiāo)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)分析　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 歐盟 瓷磚 貿(mào)易 反傾銷(xiāo)效應(yīng) 對(duì)策

【摘要】：自從2001年加入WTO后,中國(guó)與世界各國(guó)的貿(mào)易往來(lái)日趨頻繁,而歐盟作為中國(guó)的主要貿(mào)易伙伴,其各類(lèi)商品與中國(guó)的貿(mào)易規(guī)模均處于不斷上升的狀態(tài)。瓷磚行業(yè)近年來(lái)崛起速度飛快,在中國(guó)的外貿(mào)中占據(jù)的份額越來(lái)越大,已經(jīng)日益成為中國(guó)的重要外銷(xiāo)產(chǎn)品之一。然而,近年來(lái),貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義重新抬頭,歐盟等國(guó)家打著保護(hù)國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的口號(hào),頻頻發(fā)起反傾銷(xiāo),中國(guó)已經(jīng)成為歐盟反傾銷(xiāo)最大的受害國(guó),瓷磚行業(yè)也受到諸多影響。本文的選題具有以下意義:首先,我國(guó)一直是瓷磚出口第一大國(guó),研究瓷磚行業(yè)的貿(mào)易具有非常深遠(yuǎn)的意義。本文通過(guò)研究2010年具體案件,對(duì)反傾銷(xiāo)對(duì)瓷磚行業(yè)的損害做出了定量評(píng)估;其次,本文的建議和對(duì)策能幫助我國(guó)瓷磚行業(yè)企業(yè)避免反傾銷(xiāo)訴訟及在遭到反傾銷(xiāo)訴訟后有效地應(yīng)對(duì)反傾銷(xiāo)訴訟,減少反傾銷(xiāo)帶來(lái)的損失。最后,本文的分析對(duì)于政府部門(mén)制定相關(guān)的政策方針有一定的借鑒意義。對(duì)于歐盟這樣一個(gè)重要的貿(mào)易合作伙伴,政府方面在制定外貿(mào)方針時(shí)應(yīng)格外謹(jǐn)慎。本文共有五個(gè)部分。第一部分是緒論,包括文章的研究目的、意義,國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于反傾銷(xiāo)的文獻(xiàn)綜述及文章的研究思路和方法。第二部分是反傾銷(xiāo)及其效應(yīng)的理論分析,闡述了反傾銷(xiāo)的定義、內(nèi)涵,條件及反傾銷(xiāo)帶來(lái)的各種效應(yīng),包括貿(mào)易限制效應(yīng),貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)和上下游產(chǎn)業(yè)聯(lián)系效應(yīng)。第三部分是對(duì)2010年歐盟對(duì)華發(fā)起的反傾銷(xiāo)案件的詳細(xì)介紹,包括整個(gè)案件過(guò)程、對(duì)該案件雙方爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)及案件的裁決結(jié)果。第四部分,是根據(jù)案件的進(jìn)程,采用數(shù)據(jù)來(lái)驗(yàn)證之前的理論知識(shí),驗(yàn)證了貿(mào)易限制效應(yīng)、貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)及上下游關(guān)聯(lián)效應(yīng),并得出了相應(yīng)的結(jié)論。第五部分是政策和建議,針對(duì)中國(guó)瓷磚行業(yè)遭受反傾銷(xiāo)提出了相應(yīng)的對(duì)策和建議,包括政府、企業(yè)及行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)三方面的建議。通過(guò)分析歐盟對(duì)華瓷磚反傾銷(xiāo)效應(yīng),本文得出結(jié)論,即反傾銷(xiāo)措施確實(shí)存在貿(mào)易限制效應(yīng)、貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)及上下游關(guān)聯(lián)效應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:Since China joined the WTO in 2001, the trade relations between China and the rest of the world have become more and more frequent, and the European Union is China's main trading partner. Its various kinds of commodities and China's trade scale are in the state of continuous rise. Ceramic tile industry has been rising rapidly in recent years, in China's foreign trade occupies a larger and larger share. It has become one of the important export products of China. However, in recent years, trade protectionism has resurfaced, and countries such as the European Union have frequently launched anti-dumping under the slogan of protecting domestic industries. China has become the EU's largest victim of anti-dumping, the tile industry has been affected by many. The topic of this paper has the following significance: first, China has been the largest country in tile exports. It is of great significance to study the trade of ceramic tile industry. By studying the specific cases in 2010, this paper makes a quantitative evaluation on the damage caused by anti-dumping to the tile industry. Secondly, the suggestions and countermeasures of this paper can help the enterprises of ceramic tile industry to avoid the anti-dumping lawsuit and to deal with the anti-dumping lawsuit effectively after being subjected to the anti-dumping lawsuit, and to reduce the loss caused by the anti-dumping. The analysis of this paper has some reference significance for government departments to formulate relevant policies and guidelines, for the European Union as an important trading partner. The government should be very careful in formulating the foreign trade policy. There are five parts in this paper. The first part is the introduction, including the purpose and significance of the article. The second part is the theoretical analysis of antidumping and its effects, and expounds the definition, connotation, conditions and various effects of anti-dumping. The third part is a detailed introduction to the anti-dumping case initiated by the European Union against China in 2010, including the whole process of the case. According to the process of the case, the author uses the data to verify the theoretical knowledge before, and verifies the effect of trade restriction. Trade transfer effect and upstream and downstream correlation effect, and draw the corresponding conclusions. 5th part is the policy and recommendations, the Chinese tile industry suffered anti-dumping countermeasures and suggestions, including the government. Based on the analysis of the antidumping effect of EU tile to China, this paper draws the conclusion that anti-dumping measures do exist trade restriction effect, trade transfer effect and upstream and downstream correlation effect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F755;F416.71

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉向麗;魏馨;;我國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)績(jī)效的實(shí)證分析:以化工行業(yè)為例[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2010年08期

2 翁旭青;;反傾銷(xiāo)對(duì)反傾銷(xiāo)實(shí)施國(guó)的負(fù)面效應(yīng)分析[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年09期

3 王立升;;國(guó)際反傾銷(xiāo)理論及實(shí)證研究文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

4 羅琪;;歐盟產(chǎn)業(yè)地理集中對(duì)我國(guó)實(shí)施反傾銷(xiāo)的影響趨勢(shì)分析——探索歐盟對(duì)外反傾銷(xiāo)的新視角[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2014年01期

5 劉愛(ài)東;夏菲;;國(guó)際反傾銷(xiāo)經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)研究綜述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2012年05期

6 劉亞軍;淺議反傾銷(xiāo)對(duì)進(jìn)口國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不利影響[J];寧夏社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年05期

7 曾信用;;淺論歐美國(guó)家對(duì)華反傾銷(xiāo)的原因和對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2014年07期

8 譚文亮;;歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷(xiāo)對(duì)我國(guó)的出口貿(mào)易影響研究[J];企業(yè)家天地(理論版);2010年12期

9 賓建成;中國(guó)首次反傾銷(xiāo)措施執(zhí)行效果評(píng)估[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年09期

10 張慧文;劉繼武;;我國(guó)日用陶瓷遭遇反傾銷(xiāo)的原因及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];陶瓷;2013年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 薛建;傾銷(xiāo)與反傾銷(xiāo)對(duì)進(jìn)口國(guó)相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)影響的研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

2 趙文濤;中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)貿(mào)易效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

3 張?zhí)煊?歐盟對(duì)中國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)品反傾銷(xiāo)問(wèn)題的研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1391277