【摘要】：通謀虛偽行為制度是一項(xiàng)傳統(tǒng)大陸法系制度,其發(fā)展已有幾百年。本文以2013年2月20日出臺(tái)的房地產(chǎn)新政“國(guó)五條”為背景,以房屋買賣“陰陽(yáng)合同”為研究視角,對(duì)通謀虛偽行為制度進(jìn)行多維分析。隨著我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)以及房地產(chǎn)事業(yè)的迅猛發(fā)展,民事糾紛也不斷涌現(xiàn)出新的類型。我國(guó)現(xiàn)有民事法律制度在處理此類糾紛時(shí)顯得捉襟見肘。在此背景下,如何保護(hù)交易人的合法權(quán)益、如何穩(wěn)定交易安全都顯得尤為重要。筆者通過比較中外法律,并結(jié)合在工作中所遇見的實(shí)務(wù)困境,深入剖析通謀虛偽行為制度,以期對(duì)民法典的編撰提出自己的淺見。全文共分為六個(gè)部分。第一部分,導(dǎo)論。該部分是全文論述的鋪墊,首先歸納了筆者撰寫此文的研究背景,之后通過文獻(xiàn)綜述的方式對(duì)筆者參詳?shù)闹型鈱W(xué)者理論成果進(jìn)行梳理,并在此基礎(chǔ)上做了簡(jiǎn)單的評(píng)述。最后筆者歸納總結(jié)了自己的研究方法和研究路徑。第二部分,通謀虛偽行為概述。在該部分中,筆者從通謀虛偽行為的概念及構(gòu)成要件入手,對(duì)通謀虛偽行為進(jìn)行一個(gè)概括的闡述。再對(duì)其適用范圍做了一個(gè)詳細(xì)的辨析,通過對(duì)各學(xué)者爭(zhēng)議意見的羅列與分析,提出自己的觀點(diǎn)。同時(shí)為了更具體的明確通謀虛偽行為的內(nèi)涵,筆者將其與信托行為、詐害行為、脫法行為等相似概念進(jìn)行區(qū)別判斷。第三部分,通謀虛偽行為的效力分析。在這部分中,筆者圍繞通謀虛偽行為對(duì)當(dāng)事人的效力、對(duì)第三人的效力以及隱藏行為的效力三個(gè)部分展開論述。筆者羅列了不同國(guó)家的有關(guān)法律規(guī)定及中外學(xué)者的理論研究成果,為后文中與我國(guó)的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行比較埋下伏筆。第四部分,我國(guó)類似制度評(píng)析。因我國(guó)并無通謀虛偽行為制度,筆者只得對(duì)與其相類似的惡意串通以及以合法形式掩蓋非法目的的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行結(jié)構(gòu)研析,并將上述兩種制度與通謀虛偽行為作比較研究,從中分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)有制度的優(yōu)勢(shì)及劣勢(shì)。第五部分,房屋買賣“陰陽(yáng)合同”糾紛案例評(píng)析。這部分是筆者的最大創(chuàng)新之處。有關(guān)通謀虛偽行為的糾紛在司法實(shí)務(wù)中屢見不鮮。筆者結(jié)合自身工作,選取房屋買賣“陰陽(yáng)合同”這一典型的通謀虛偽行為為切入點(diǎn),直觀反映出我國(guó)現(xiàn)有制度與通謀虛偽行為制度的差異,同時(shí)引入筆者自己的思考與評(píng)述,以期完善我國(guó)相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的立法。第六部分,我國(guó)立法現(xiàn)狀分析。在這部分中,筆者從我國(guó)民法典編撰的角度,再次深入分析了通謀虛偽行為與惡意串通、以合法形式掩蓋非法目的的區(qū)別,詳述了在我國(guó)不建立通謀虛偽行為制度的情況下,適用惡意串通、以合法形式掩蓋非法目的時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)注意的問題。希望通過筆者初淺的建議,填補(bǔ)我國(guó)相關(guān)領(lǐng)域立法的漏洞,更好的促進(jìn)法制建設(shè)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Collusion hypocrisy system is a traditional civil law system, its development has been hundreds of years. With the background of the New deal of Real Estate "National five" which was introduced on February 20, 2013, and from the perspective of "Yin Yang contract", this paper makes a multi-dimensional analysis on the system of collusion hypocrisy. With the rapid development of socialist market economy and real estate industry in China, new types of civil disputes are emerging. The existing civil law system of our country is overstretched in dealing with such disputes. In this context, how to protect the legitimate rights and interests of traders, how to stabilize the transaction security is particularly important. By comparing the Chinese and foreign laws and combining the practical difficulties encountered in the work, the author deeply analyzes the system of collusion hypocrisy, in order to put forward his own views on the compilation of the Civil Code. The full text is divided into six parts. The first part, introduction. This part is the foreshadowing of the full text. Firstly, the author summarizes the research background of this article, and then combs the theoretical achievements of the Chinese and foreign scholars through literature review, and on this basis makes a brief comment. Finally, the author summarizes his research methods and research path. The second part is an overview of collusion hypocrisy. In this part, the author begins with the concept and elements of collusion hypocrisy, and gives a general exposition of collusion hypocrisy. Then it makes a detailed analysis of the scope of its application, and puts forward its own views through the enumeration and analysis of the controversial opinions of various scholars. At the same time, in order to clarify the connotation of collusion hypocrisy more concretely, the author distinguishes it from the similar concepts such as trust behavior, deceitful behavior, dishonest behavior and so on. The third part, the effectiveness analysis of collusion hypocrisy. In this part, the author discusses the effectiveness of collusion hypocrisy on the parties, the effectiveness of the third party and the effectiveness of the hidden act. The author lists the relevant laws and regulations of different countries and the theoretical research results of Chinese and foreign scholars. The fourth part, our country similar system appraisal. Since there is no system of premeditated hypocrisy in our country, the author has to study the structure of malicious collusion similar to it and the relevant provisions that cover up the illegal purpose in a legal form, and make a comparative study between the two systems and collusion hypocrisy. From the analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of China's existing system. The fifth part, the housing sale "Yin Yang contract" dispute case analysis. This part is the author's greatest innovation. The dispute about collusion hypocrisy is common in judicial practice. In combination with my own work, the author chooses the typical hypocrisy of collusion as the starting point, which reflects the difference between the existing system and the system of collusion hypocrisy. At the same time, the author introduces his own thoughts and comments. In order to improve the relevant areas of legislation. The sixth part analyzes the current situation of legislation in China. In this part, from the angle of compiling the civil code of our country, the author analyzes the difference between collusion hypocrisy and malicious collusion, and covers the illegal purpose in legal form, and details the situation that the system of collusion hypocrisy is not established in our country. The application of malicious collusion, in legal form to cover up the illegal purpose should pay attention to. The author hopes to fill the loophole in the legislation of relevant fields through the author's initial suggestions, and promote the development of legal system better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 孟銀芳;;“黑白合同”與合同變更比較[A];中國(guó)民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2396727