【摘要】：改革開(kāi)放以來(lái),我國(guó)房產(chǎn)建筑業(yè)取得了飛速發(fā)展,在滿足居民的住房需求的同時(shí),也極大的拉動(dòng)了經(jīng)濟(jì)總量持續(xù)的增長(zhǎng)。但是,我們應(yīng)當(dāng)看到,我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)建筑業(yè)還處于初步發(fā)展階段,相關(guān)法律制度不是很完善,房地產(chǎn)建筑業(yè)秩序也較為混亂,其中在建設(shè)施工領(lǐng)域充斥著大量的黑白合同,建設(shè)工程施工發(fā)包方與承包方為了躲避國(guó)家對(duì)建筑施工工程的監(jiān)管或其他原因,往往在私下里簽訂與招投標(biāo)備案施工合同實(shí)質(zhì)性內(nèi)容不一致的協(xié)議。這種協(xié)議的效力不僅僅關(guān)乎合同雙方的利益,同時(shí)也涉及到建筑市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管問(wèn)題以及其監(jiān)管背后所體現(xiàn)的公共利益。是否承認(rèn)此種協(xié)議有效,是要維護(hù)契約自由,放活市場(chǎng)；還是要嚴(yán)厲監(jiān)管,維護(hù)公共秩序,這涉及不同的價(jià)值取向。本文主要是在歸類不同黑白合同的基礎(chǔ)上,研究建設(shè)工程施工黑白合同效力,并列舉相關(guān)案例來(lái)分析我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中在認(rèn)定建設(shè)工程施工黑白合同效力以及處理建設(shè)工程施工黑白合同案件時(shí)出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題。依據(jù)自己對(duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題的認(rèn)識(shí),希望能提出處理此種問(wèn)題時(shí)可供采納的建議。本文除前言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外,共有三部分： 第一部分主要介紹了建設(shè)工程施工黑白合同概念,分析了黑白合同形成的原因,構(gòu)成要件,并劃分不同類型的建設(shè)工程施工黑白合同,從而形成對(duì)黑白合同的整體認(rèn)知。 第二部分主要從我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐在認(rèn)定建設(shè)工程施工黑白合同效力時(shí)的處理展開(kāi),通過(guò)案例分析總結(jié)出我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中在審理此種案件時(shí)的不足以及相關(guān)法律規(guī)范存在的缺陷。 第三部分主要通過(guò)對(duì)上述兩部分的分析,在劃分不同類型黑白合同的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)各種類型的施工黑白合同的效力及處理方法作出相應(yīng)的分析。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's real estate construction industry has made rapid development, while meeting the housing needs of the residents, but also greatly promoted the sustained growth of the total economic volume. However, we should see that the real estate construction industry in our country is still in the initial stage of development, the relevant legal system is not very perfect, the order of the real estate construction industry is also relatively chaotic, among which there are a large number of black-and-white contracts in the field of construction and construction. In order to avoid the supervision and other reasons of the construction project, the contractor and the contractor often sign in private the agreement which is inconsistent with the substantive content of the construction contract. The validity of this agreement concerns not only the interests of both parties, but also the regulation of the construction market and the public interest embodied in the regulation. Whether to recognize the validity of such an agreement is to safeguard the freedom of contract and liberalize the market, or to strictly regulate and maintain public order, which involves different value orientations. On the basis of classifying different black-and-white contracts, this paper mainly studies the effectiveness of black-and-white contracts for construction projects. This paper also enumerates relevant cases to analyze the problems in the judicial practice of our country in determining the effectiveness of black-and-white contracts for construction projects and in dealing with cases of construction black-and-white contracts of construction projects. Based on your own understanding of related issues, I hope to put forward some suggestions for dealing with them. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this paper has three parts: the first part mainly introduces the concept of construction black-and-white contract, analyzes the reasons for the formation of black-and-white contract, And divided into different types of construction black-and-white contracts, thus forming the overall understanding of black-and-white contracts. The second part mainly from the judicial practice of our country in the determination of construction black-and-white contract effectiveness treatment, through the analysis of cases summed up in our judicial practice in the trial of such cases, as well as the shortcomings of relevant legal norms. The third part mainly through the analysis of the above two parts, on the basis of dividing different types of black-and-white contracts, the effectiveness of various types of construction black-and-white contracts and the corresponding analysis of the treatment methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.297;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 錢(qián)思雯;;建設(shè)工程“黑白合同”效力問(wèn)題研究[J];常熟理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

2 徐滌宇;合同效力正當(dāng)性的解釋模式及其重建[J];法商研究;2005年03期

3 徐國(guó)良;;中標(biāo)合同的實(shí)質(zhì)性變更和非實(shí)質(zhì)性變更[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2009年02期

4 賴偉;;淺析建設(shè)工程“黑白合同”的法律效力問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年06期

5 鄒文娟;;建筑工程施工“黑白合同”效力的合同法原理分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年20期

6 孫文楨;;合同效力問(wèn)題三論——以《合同法》三個(gè)法條為中心[J];法治研究;2010年07期

7 何佰洲,周顯峰;透視陰陽(yáng)合同現(xiàn)象 反思我國(guó)招標(biāo)投標(biāo)制度[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

8 胡冰;;建設(shè)工程“黑白合同”法律效力問(wèn)題探討[J];山西建筑;2010年28期

9 張衛(wèi);劉洪坤;;建設(shè)工程“黑合同”效力認(rèn)定探析[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

10 李志國(guó);;建設(shè)工程合同并入承攬合同是契約精神的理性回歸[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2010年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：2358873