【摘要】：商品房質(zhì)量不僅直接影響工程本身的功能、適用性和建設(shè)項(xiàng)目的投資收益,其質(zhì)量層次和水平也是各房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)綜合競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的重要體現(xiàn)。如何科學(xué)、合理、客觀、公正地評(píng)定各企業(yè)所建商品房的質(zhì)量等級(jí),更是政府管理部門(mén)、廣大消費(fèi)者以及社會(huì)各界人士都十分關(guān)注的重要課題。目前,雖然大多數(shù)商品房都能以合格的驗(yàn)收結(jié)論被推向市場(chǎng),但是這只是對(duì)商品房質(zhì)量的最基本評(píng)價(jià),在此基礎(chǔ)上應(yīng)該有的質(zhì)量評(píng)級(jí),越來(lái)越為群眾及社會(huì)所需要。 中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的十八大報(bào)告提出加強(qiáng)和創(chuàng)新社會(huì)管理,提高社會(huì)管理科學(xué)化水平,改進(jìn)政府提供公共服務(wù)方式,強(qiáng)化企事業(yè)單位、人民團(tuán)體在社會(huì)管理和服務(wù)中的職責(zé),引導(dǎo)社會(huì)組織健康有序發(fā)展,充分發(fā)揮群眾參與社會(huì)管理的基礎(chǔ)作用。這為非政府組織在我國(guó)新形勢(shì)下的快速發(fā)展指明了方向,也為社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,如何更好的推動(dòng)我國(guó)商品房質(zhì)量的發(fā)展提升,開(kāi)創(chuàng)了一個(gè)新的領(lǐng)域,因此,本文從我國(guó)商品房管理現(xiàn)狀入手,詳細(xì)分析了我國(guó)商品房質(zhì)量驗(yàn)收及評(píng)級(jí)現(xiàn)狀；總結(jié)了在商品房質(zhì)量管理中存在的不足和問(wèn)題；引出了非政府組織概論；歸納了國(guó)內(nèi)外非政府組織在參與商品房質(zhì)量管理及評(píng)級(jí)中的-些做法及經(jīng)驗(yàn)；提出非政府組織參與商品房質(zhì)量評(píng)級(jí)的構(gòu)想,運(yùn)用層次分析法構(gòu)建模型,并根據(jù)多目標(biāo)指標(biāo)值的實(shí)例輸入,對(duì)所提出的模型進(jìn)行了驗(yàn)證,評(píng)級(jí)得出的結(jié)果和結(jié)論對(duì)于滿足社會(huì)信息需求,促進(jìn)和完善我國(guó)商品房質(zhì)量管理制度,提高其質(zhì)量和水平,促進(jìn)企業(yè)之間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和發(fā)展都具有重要的指導(dǎo)意義和參考價(jià)值,將為各企業(yè)專(zhuān)業(yè)建設(shè)和發(fā)展提供積極有益的比較信息,為廣大消費(fèi)者優(yōu)選住房提供必不可少的重要參考。
[Abstract]:The quality of commercial housing not only directly affects the function, applicability and investment income of construction projects, but also the quality level and level of quality is an important embodiment of the comprehensive competitiveness of real estate development enterprises. How to scientifically, reasonably, objectively and impartially evaluate the quality grade of commercial housing built by various enterprises is an important issue that the government management departments, consumers and people from all walks of life pay close attention to. At present, most commercial housing can be pushed to the market with qualified acceptance conclusion, but this is only the most basic evaluation of the quality of commercial housing. On this basis, there should be a quality rating, which is more and more needed by the masses and the society. The report of the 18th CPC National Congress proposed to strengthen and innovate social management, improve the scientific level of social management, improve the way the government provides public services, and strengthen the responsibilities of enterprises, institutions, and people's organizations in social management and service. To guide the healthy and orderly development of social organizations and give full play to the basic role of the masses in social management. This has pointed out the direction for the rapid development of non-governmental organizations under the new situation in our country, but also for the social transition period, how to better promote the development and upgrading of the quality of commercial housing in our country, thus creating a new field, Starting with the current situation of commercial housing management in China, this paper analyzes in detail the quality acceptance and rating status of commercial housing in China, summarizes the shortcomings and problems existing in the quality management of commercial housing, and leads to the introduction of non-governmental organizations. This paper summarizes some practices and experiences of NGOs in participating in the quality management and rating of commercial housing at home and abroad, puts forward the conception of NGOs participating in the quality rating of commercial housing, and constructs the model by using AHP. According to the example input of multi-objective index value, the proposed model is verified. The results and conclusions of the rating can meet the needs of social information, promote and perfect the quality management system of commercial housing in China, and improve its quality and level. The promotion of competition and development among enterprises has important guiding significance and reference value, which will provide positive and beneficial comparative information for the professional construction and development of enterprises, and provide essential and important reference for consumers to select housing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D632.9;F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張冬茵;;香港PASS系統(tǒng)與深圳市建設(shè)工程質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)體系對(duì)比分析[J];工程質(zhì)量;2008年03期

2 陳昊;;城市居民住房質(zhì)量滿意度評(píng)價(jià)——以上海市為例[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2011年04期

3 劉慶琨;郭金光;;淺析建筑工程設(shè)計(jì)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)制的創(chuàng)新[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2010年06期

4 何伯洲,周顯峰,譚大璐;轉(zhuǎn)變工程質(zhì)量監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)工作機(jī)制的研究[J];哈爾濱建筑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

5 朱英;20世紀(jì)中國(guó)民間社團(tuán)發(fā)展演變的歷史軌跡[J];華中理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

6 胡建文;香港工程建設(shè)和建筑業(yè)管理體制的若干特點(diǎn)[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);1998年09期

7 萊斯特·薩拉蒙,譚靜;非營(yíng)利部門(mén)的崛起[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2002年03期

8 賈西津;;中國(guó)公民參與的非政府組織途徑分析[J];中國(guó)非營(yíng)利評(píng)論;2007年01期

9 王名;劉求實(shí);;中國(guó)非政府組織發(fā)展的制度分析[J];中國(guó)非營(yíng)利評(píng)論;2007年01期

10 李曉鳳;;非政府組織的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀初探[J];求實(shí);2006年S1期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蘇永強(qiáng);建筑工程設(shè)計(jì)文件質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)理論與方法研究[D];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)（北京）;2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2119426