本文關(guān)鍵詞： 保障性住房 融資模式 PPP　出處：《南京林業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)過三十余年的發(fā)展，我國的住房保障制度逐步建立并完善，形成了以經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房、廉租房、公共租賃住房為主要形式的住房保障體系�！笆濉币詠�，我國加快了保障性住房建設(shè)的步伐，計劃于這五年間，建設(shè)3600萬套保障性住房。這些動作對解決城鎮(zhèn)中低收入家庭住房問題，緩解國內(nèi)住房需求矛盾，穩(wěn)定房地產(chǎn)市場起到了重要作用。但是同時要看到，我國目前的保障性住房建設(shè)存在諸如對國家財政收入的依賴性過強，建設(shè)資金來源穩(wěn)定性不夠，無法對地方政府形成有效激勵，金融工具缺失等問題，這使我國保障性住房建設(shè)的穩(wěn)定性和可持續(xù)性大打折扣。因此，拓寬融資渠道，多樣化融資模式就顯得尤為重要。 論文對近年來我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房、廉租房、公共租賃住房政策進(jìn)行梳理，立足于我國保障性住房發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實狀況，指出融資模式是目前制約我國保障性住房建設(shè)的瓶頸之一。在對比分析REITs、資產(chǎn)證券化、PPP等住房問題解決較好國家用來解決住房保障問題的融資模式后發(fā)現(xiàn)，REITS和資產(chǎn)證券化若要在我國推廣，缺乏必要的支撐條件。若將PPP融資模式應(yīng)用于我國保障性住房的建設(shè)當(dāng)中，有利于提高工作效率，降低工程費用，減輕政府壓力，并且充分發(fā)揮公、私雙方比較優(yōu)勢，對推動項目發(fā)展非常有利。而且我國多個城市已將PPP模式應(yīng)用于水務(wù)發(fā)展、高速公路建設(shè)等基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)，若將PPP模式移植到保障性住房建設(shè)中來，也將有一定經(jīng)驗可以借鑒。 在此基礎(chǔ)上，借鑒世界上PPP模式發(fā)達(dá)國家和地區(qū)經(jīng)驗，對傳統(tǒng)PPP模式進(jìn)行改造，構(gòu)造適合應(yīng)用到我國保障性住房建設(shè)中的融資模式：在國家層次上設(shè)立PPP模式統(tǒng)籌機構(gòu)，充當(dāng)PPP模式的引導(dǎo)者；在政府部門和私人部門之間融入中間組織，作為政府和私人部門的協(xié)調(diào)者；政府部門則要進(jìn)行必要的分權(quán)，，將角色從主導(dǎo)者轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榉⻊?wù)者。這樣國家層面統(tǒng)籌機構(gòu)、政府、中間組織以及市場相互補充，相互支持、相互監(jiān)督，不僅使得權(quán)力尋租的機會減少，由于各方關(guān)系的理順，保障性住房的供給效率也會大大提高，實現(xiàn)各參與方的共贏。 通過“政府履約情況的博弈分析”和“政府監(jiān)督與私人企業(yè)推卸責(zé)任的博弈分析”，得出結(jié)論，國家層面統(tǒng)籌機構(gòu)和中間組織的添加對于降低項目風(fēng)險，提高項目運行效率和項目質(zhì)量有非常積極的作用，驗證了改進(jìn)PPP模式在我國保障性住房建設(shè)中的適應(yīng)性。
[Abstract]:After more than 30 years of development, China's housing security system is gradually established and improved, forming a housing security system with comfortable housing, low-rent housing, public rental housing as the main form. "Twelfth Five-Year Plan". China has accelerated the pace of the construction of affordable housing, planning to build 36 million sets of affordable housing in these five years. These actions will solve the housing problem of low-income families in cities and towns, ease the contradiction of domestic housing demand. Stabilizing the real estate market has played an important role, but at the same time, we should see that the current construction of affordable housing in our country, such as the dependence on national financial revenue is too strong, the stability of construction funds is not enough. Unable to form effective incentives to local governments, lack of financial instruments and other problems, which makes the stability and sustainability of the construction of affordable housing in China greatly reduced. Therefore, broaden the financing channels. Diversification of the financing model is particularly important. The thesis combs the recent years' comfortable housing, low-rent housing, public rental housing policy, based on the reality of the development of affordable housing in China. It is pointed out that the financing mode is one of the bottlenecks restricting the construction of affordable housing in China at present. In the comparative analysis of REITs, asset securitization. PPP and other housing problems in better countries to solve the housing security problem of the financing model found that it and asset securitization in China if the promotion. Lack of necessary supporting conditions. If the PPP financing model is applied to the construction of affordable housing in China, it will help to improve the work efficiency, reduce project costs, reduce government pressure, and give full play to the public. Private comparative advantage is very beneficial to the development of the project, and many cities in China have applied the PPP model to water development, highway construction and other infrastructure construction. If the PPP model is transplanted to the construction of indemnificatory housing, there will be some experience to learn from it. On this basis, using the experience of the developed countries and regions in the world for reference, the traditional PPP model is reformed. The structure is suitable for the financing mode in the construction of the indemnificatory housing in our country: set up the overall organization of the PPP mode at the national level and act as the guide of the PPP model; Integration of intermediate organizations between the Government and the private sector, acting as coordinators between the Government and the private sector; Government departments should carry out the necessary decentralization and change their roles from leaders to service providers. Thus the national level co-ordinating agencies, governments, intermediate organizations and the market complement each other, support each other, and supervise each other. It not only reduces the opportunity of power rent-seeking, but also improves the efficiency of the supply of affordable housing because of the straightening out of the relations between the parties, and realizes the win-win situation of the participants. Through "game analysis of government performance" and "game analysis of government supervision and shirking responsibility of private enterprises", it is concluded that the addition of national level co-ordinating agencies and intermediate organizations can reduce project risk. Improving the efficiency and quality of the project has a very positive effect, which verifies the adaptability of the improved PPP model in the construction of affordable housing in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F299.23;F832.45

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李明偉;;金融創(chuàng)新工具缺陷與風(fēng)險控制缺失——美國次貸危機成因再透視[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年16期

2 錢瑛瑛;中國住房保障政策研究——經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房與廉租住房[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2003年08期

3 房秀娟;完善我國住房社會保障制度的幾點思考[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2005年05期

4 巴曙松;;中國廉租房的融資特征及其發(fā)展路徑研究(上)[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2006年09期

5 張杰;;舊城更新中經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房安居困境的制度反思[J];規(guī)劃師;2010年03期

6 李政;;從美國次貸危機看金融創(chuàng)新與金融監(jiān)管的關(guān)系[J];海南金融;2009年04期

7 沈潔;謝嗣勝;;公共租賃住房融資模式研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2011年01期

8 周丹;王恩裕;;資產(chǎn)證券化對我國貨幣政策的影響初探[J];金融理論與實踐;2007年04期

9 朱亞兵;;經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的性質(zhì)及其制度設(shè)計研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2010年01期

10 田一淋;馬光紅;黃曉峰;;以中間組織為樞紐的PPP模式住房保障體系探討[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年02期

本文編號：1444139