呼和浩特市區(qū)城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展多情景模擬研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-29 21:56
【摘要】：呼和浩特市城市化進(jìn)程的加快一方面促進(jìn)了區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,另一方面也給區(qū)域生態(tài)環(huán)境帶來(lái)了極大破壞,使區(qū)域資源、環(huán)境等各方面矛盾突出。因此,將呼和浩特市區(qū)城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展引起的生態(tài)環(huán)境問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入、系統(tǒng)地研究,對(duì)于保護(hù)區(qū)域生態(tài)安全,實(shí)現(xiàn)城市可持續(xù)發(fā)展具有重要意義�；谏鲜霰尘�,本文以“城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展情景模擬——生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)效應(yīng)——相應(yīng)調(diào)控策略”為研究主線(xiàn),以呼和浩特市區(qū)為例,借鑒景觀生態(tài)學(xué)、城市規(guī)劃學(xué)等相關(guān)理論,利用遙感、地理信息系統(tǒng)技術(shù)和CLUE-S模型模擬了2025年呼和浩特市區(qū)不同情景下城市用地的變化情況,并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)研究區(qū)進(jìn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)。旨在探究不同情景下城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展對(duì)生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的影響,為城市合理發(fā)展提供調(diào)控策略。研究結(jié)果如下:(1)以CLUE-S模型為基礎(chǔ),選取自然因素、社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)因素和距離因素等,模擬呼和浩特市區(qū)2010年的土地利用變化,并利用Kappa指數(shù)結(jié)合2010年的實(shí)際解譯數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證。在此基礎(chǔ)上分別模擬研究區(qū)2025年自然增長(zhǎng)、糧食保護(hù)、生態(tài)保護(hù)、土地規(guī)劃四種情景下土地利用變化,結(jié)果顯示不同情景下土地利用格局存在顯著差異。(2)研究區(qū)1990-2014年城市用地規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大,24年間城市用地面積擴(kuò)大了32935.682hm,面積增長(zhǎng)了將近3倍。四個(gè)研究時(shí)段內(nèi)城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展速度及強(qiáng)度均有所不同,但總體上呈上升趨勢(shì)。其中,2001-2010年城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展速度、擴(kuò)展強(qiáng)度均最大。(3)2025年各情景下的城市用地均呈增加趨勢(shì)。其中自然增長(zhǎng)情景下,城市用地增幅最大,城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展方向以東部及南部為主。生態(tài)保護(hù)情景下,城市用地增幅最小。糧食保護(hù)情景下,城市用地主要向東及南部呈無(wú)規(guī)則擴(kuò)展,城市形狀復(fù)雜。土地規(guī)劃情景下,城市用地分布較集中。(4)2025年各情景下研究區(qū)整體生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指數(shù)水平各不相同,其中,土地規(guī)劃情景下生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指數(shù)最低,僅為0.1081;糧食保護(hù)情景下研究區(qū)整體生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指數(shù)最高,為0.2252。(5)2025年各情景下生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)空間分布格局有較大差異。自然增長(zhǎng)情景下,生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)以低及較低生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等級(jí)為主,主要分布在研究區(qū)中西部、大黑河南部及東北部山區(qū)。糧食保護(hù)情景下,高生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等級(jí)面積比例為66.39%,分布貫穿研究區(qū)東北部及南部地區(qū)。生態(tài)保護(hù)情景下,較低等級(jí)生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)面積占研究區(qū)總面積的66.83%,主要分布在除大黑河沿岸外的北部山區(qū),東部及南部區(qū)域。土地規(guī)劃情景下,以低及較低等級(jí)生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)為主,占研究區(qū)面積79.38%;高生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)主要分布在大黑河沿岸。(6)從不同情景城市用地?cái)U(kuò)展模擬及所致生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)來(lái)看,土地規(guī)劃情景是最優(yōu)的城市發(fā)展方案。未來(lái)城市發(fā)展中,要適當(dāng)推行退耕還林政策以保證區(qū)域生態(tài)質(zhì)量,規(guī)劃基本農(nóng)田區(qū)以保障糧食供應(yīng),合理規(guī)劃城市擴(kuò)展,在促進(jìn)城市擴(kuò)展的同時(shí)保障生態(tài)質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:On the one hand, the acceleration of urbanization in Hohhot has promoted the development of regional economy, on the other hand, it has also brought great damage to the regional ecological environment, which makes the contradiction between regional resources and environment prominent. Therefore, it is of great significance to deeply and systematically study the ecological environment problems caused by the urban land use expansion in Hohhot for the protection of regional ecological security and the realization of urban sustainable development. Based on the above background, this paper takes "urban land use expansion scenario simulation-ecological risk effect-corresponding regulation and control strategy" as the main line of research, takes Hohhot urban area as an example, draws lessons from landscape ecology, urban planning and other related theories. Remote sensing, GIS technology and CLUE-S model are used to simulate the change of urban land use under different scenarios in Hohhot city in 2025. on this basis, the risk assessment of the study area is carried out. The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of urban land use expansion on ecological risk under different scenarios, and to provide regulation and control strategies for the rational development of the city. The results are as follows: (1) based on CLUE-S model, natural factors, social and economic factors and distance factors are selected to simulate the land use change in Hohhot city in 2010. The Kappa index combined with the actual interpretation data in 2010 is used to verify. On this basis, the land use changes under the four scenarios of natural growth, grain protection, ecological protection and land planning in the study area in 2025 were simulated respectively. The results showed that there were significant differences in land use pattern under different scenarios. (2) the scale of urban land use in the study area expanded continuously from 1990 to 2014, and the urban land use area increased by 32935.682hm in the past 24 years, and the area increased nearly tripled. The expansion speed and intensity of urban land use are different in the four research periods, but on the whole, it shows an upward trend. From 2001 to 2010, the expansion speed and intensity of urban land use are the highest. (3) the urban land use in 2025 shows an increasing trend. Under the natural growth scenario, the increase of urban land is the largest, and the direction of urban land expansion is mainly in the east and south. Under the scenario of ecological protection, the increase of urban land use is the smallest. Under the scenario of food protection, the urban land mainly expands irregularly to the east and south, and the shape of the city is complex. Under the scenario of land planning, the distribution of urban land is more concentrated. (4) the overall ecological risk index level of the study area is different under each scenario in 2025, among which the ecological risk index is the lowest under the land planning scenario, which is only 0.1081; Under the scenario of grain protection, the overall ecological risk index of the study area is the highest, which is 0.225.2. (5) the spatial distribution pattern of ecological risk under each scenario in 2025 is quite different. Under the natural growth scenario, the ecological risk is mainly low and low ecological risk grade, mainly distributed in the central and western parts of the study area, the southern and northeast mountains of Dahei River. Under the scenario of grain protection, the proportion of high ecological risk grade area is 66.39%, which runs through the northeast and south of the study area. Under the scenario of ecological protection, the lower grade ecological risk area accounts for 66.83% of the total area of the study area, which is mainly distributed in the northern mountainous areas except the Dahei River, the eastern and southern regions. Under the scenario of land planning, the ecological risk of low and lower grade is the main, accounting for 79.38% of the area of the study area. The high ecological risk is mainly distributed along the coast of Dahehe River. (6) from the simulation of urban land use expansion and the ecological risk caused by different scenarios, land planning scenario is the best urban development scheme. In the future urban development, we should properly carry out the policy of returning farmland to forest in order to ensure the regional ecological quality, plan the basic farmland area to ensure the grain supply, plan the urban expansion reasonably, and guarantee the ecological quality while promoting the urban expansion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.23
本文編號(hào)：2488253
[Abstract]:On the one hand, the acceleration of urbanization in Hohhot has promoted the development of regional economy, on the other hand, it has also brought great damage to the regional ecological environment, which makes the contradiction between regional resources and environment prominent. Therefore, it is of great significance to deeply and systematically study the ecological environment problems caused by the urban land use expansion in Hohhot for the protection of regional ecological security and the realization of urban sustainable development. Based on the above background, this paper takes "urban land use expansion scenario simulation-ecological risk effect-corresponding regulation and control strategy" as the main line of research, takes Hohhot urban area as an example, draws lessons from landscape ecology, urban planning and other related theories. Remote sensing, GIS technology and CLUE-S model are used to simulate the change of urban land use under different scenarios in Hohhot city in 2025. on this basis, the risk assessment of the study area is carried out. The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of urban land use expansion on ecological risk under different scenarios, and to provide regulation and control strategies for the rational development of the city. The results are as follows: (1) based on CLUE-S model, natural factors, social and economic factors and distance factors are selected to simulate the land use change in Hohhot city in 2010. The Kappa index combined with the actual interpretation data in 2010 is used to verify. On this basis, the land use changes under the four scenarios of natural growth, grain protection, ecological protection and land planning in the study area in 2025 were simulated respectively. The results showed that there were significant differences in land use pattern under different scenarios. (2) the scale of urban land use in the study area expanded continuously from 1990 to 2014, and the urban land use area increased by 32935.682hm in the past 24 years, and the area increased nearly tripled. The expansion speed and intensity of urban land use are different in the four research periods, but on the whole, it shows an upward trend. From 2001 to 2010, the expansion speed and intensity of urban land use are the highest. (3) the urban land use in 2025 shows an increasing trend. Under the natural growth scenario, the increase of urban land is the largest, and the direction of urban land expansion is mainly in the east and south. Under the scenario of ecological protection, the increase of urban land use is the smallest. Under the scenario of food protection, the urban land mainly expands irregularly to the east and south, and the shape of the city is complex. Under the scenario of land planning, the distribution of urban land is more concentrated. (4) the overall ecological risk index level of the study area is different under each scenario in 2025, among which the ecological risk index is the lowest under the land planning scenario, which is only 0.1081; Under the scenario of grain protection, the overall ecological risk index of the study area is the highest, which is 0.225.2. (5) the spatial distribution pattern of ecological risk under each scenario in 2025 is quite different. Under the natural growth scenario, the ecological risk is mainly low and low ecological risk grade, mainly distributed in the central and western parts of the study area, the southern and northeast mountains of Dahei River. Under the scenario of grain protection, the proportion of high ecological risk grade area is 66.39%, which runs through the northeast and south of the study area. Under the scenario of ecological protection, the lower grade ecological risk area accounts for 66.83% of the total area of the study area, which is mainly distributed in the northern mountainous areas except the Dahei River, the eastern and southern regions. Under the scenario of land planning, the ecological risk of low and lower grade is the main, accounting for 79.38% of the area of the study area. The high ecological risk is mainly distributed along the coast of Dahehe River. (6) from the simulation of urban land use expansion and the ecological risk caused by different scenarios, land planning scenario is the best urban development scheme. In the future urban development, we should properly carry out the policy of returning farmland to forest in order to ensure the regional ecological quality, plan the basic farmland area to ensure the grain supply, plan the urban expansion reasonably, and guarantee the ecological quality while promoting the urban expansion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.23
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王祺;蒙吉軍;毛熙彥;;基于鄰域相關(guān)的漓江流域土地利用多情景模擬與景觀格局變化[J];地理研究;2014年06期
2 曾永年;靳文憑;王慧敏;張鴻輝;;青海高原東部土地利用變化模擬與景觀生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期
3 吳莉;侯西勇;邸向紅;;山東省沿海區(qū)域景觀生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];生態(tài)學(xué)雜志;2014年01期
4 尚正永;張小林;周曉鐘;;基于RS/GIS的城市空間擴(kuò)展與外部形態(tài)演變研究——以江蘇省淮安市為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2012年08期
5 孫賢斌;劉紅玉;;江蘇鹽城市海濱土地利用對(duì)景觀生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的影響[J];國(guó)土資源遙感;2011年03期
6 許妍;高俊峰;高永年;;基于土地利用動(dòng)態(tài)變化的太湖地區(qū)景觀生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[J];湖泊科學(xué);2011年04期
7 李傳哲;于福亮;劉佳;嚴(yán)登華;周婷;;近20年來(lái)黑河干流中游地區(qū)土地利用/覆被變化及驅(qū)動(dòng)力定量研究[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期
8 巫麗蕓;;福建東山島景觀生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)及管理研究[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版)農(nóng)學(xué)卷;2010年04期
9 高永年;高俊峰;許妍;;太湖流域水生態(tài)功能區(qū)土地利用變化的景觀生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)效應(yīng)[J];自然資源學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期
10 李新琪;金海龍;朱海涌;;干旱區(qū)內(nèi)陸艾比湖流域平原區(qū)景觀生態(tài)安全評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];干旱環(huán)境監(jiān)測(cè);2010年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 李保杰;礦區(qū)土地景觀格局演變及其生態(tài)效應(yīng)研究[D];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
2 傅麗華;基于景觀結(jié)構(gòu)的長(zhǎng)株潭核心區(qū)土地利用生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)調(diào)控研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年
3 賀秋華;江蘇濱海土地利用/覆蓋變化及其生態(tài)環(huán)境效應(yīng)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年
4 彭建;喀斯特生態(tài)脆弱區(qū)土地利用/覆被變化研究[D];北京大學(xué);2006年
5 譚永忠;縣級(jí)尺度土地利用變化驅(qū)動(dòng)機(jī)制及空間格局變化模擬研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 孫會(huì)慧;基于景觀結(jié)構(gòu)的河西走廊地區(qū)生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2014年
2 王迅;基于3S技術(shù)的甘南地區(qū)生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2010年
3 梁佳斌;天津市近岸海域生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[D];天津大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號(hào)：2488253
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jingjifazhanlunwen/2488253.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
