【摘要】：在我國的傳統行政管理中,公共項目通常由政府提供,這使得政府部門的財政負擔和融資風險增大,而且難以獲得良好的建設、運行效率。為克服以上弊端,我國引入了PPP(Public-Private-Partnership)模式。然而在PPP體系下,我國對BOT項目的績效評估研究缺乏系統性,主要局限在項目立項、招投標和建設階段,對于項目后期的運營和移交的研究比較少。本文從時間線切入,將項目整個過程分成五個階段,在參考已有的研究結果上,結合每個階段自身特點進行全面系統的識別指標,通過指標篩選并形成指標體系。本文首先闡述研究背景、研究意義以及在PPP體系下BOT項目的內涵;然后以成功的關鍵要素分析為基礎,通過建立在PPP體系下BOT項目的績效評價指標體系得出各方的戰(zhàn)略目標。其次,選取和確定評價要素并最終識別關鍵指標,根據指標是否可量化的特性區(qū)別定量指標和定性指標,再運用模糊綜合評價法對影響因素進一步量化,從而給出項目公司的整體績效綜合評價,并通過案例證明該方法的有效性和可行性。BOT項目績效評價與BOT項目后評價具有明顯差異,與BOT項目社會評價更是存在根本性差距。本文利用關鍵成功因素思想,在PPP項目關鍵成功要素和項目核心過程分析的基礎上,構建出了具有27個一級評價指標和52個二級衡量指標的指標體系,該指標體系可運用于BOT項目運行全過程的項目績效評價;其次,對南昌市麥園餐廚處理BOT項目進行了案例分析,通過對指標的分析最終得出該項目績效評價為一般,在該BOT項目中,環(huán)境效益和社會效益表現一般,需要提高技術水平得到更好的結果。
[Abstract]:In the traditional administration of our country, public projects are usually provided by the government, which makes the financial burden and financing risk of the government increased, and it is difficult to obtain good construction and operational efficiency. In order to overcome the above disadvantages, PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) mode is introduced in our country. However, under the PPP system, the research on the performance evaluation of the BOT project in our country is lack of systematicness, which is mainly limited in the stage of project establishment, bidding and construction, and the research on the operation and handover of the later stage of the project is relatively few. In this paper, the whole process of the project is divided into five stages from the time line. On the basis of the existing research results and the characteristics of each stage, this paper carries out a comprehensive and systematic identification index, through which the index system is selected and formed. In this paper, the background, significance and connotation of the BOT project under the PPP system are first expounded, and then the strategic objectives of all parties are obtained through the establishment of the performance evaluation index system of the BOT project under the PPP system based on the analysis of the key elements of success. Secondly, select and determine the evaluation elements and finally identify the key indicators, according to the quantifiable characteristics of the indicators to distinguish the quantitative and qualitative indicators, and then use the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to further quantify the influencing factors. The results show that the effectiveness and feasibility of the method are obviously different from the post-evaluation of BOT project, and there is a fundamental gap between the method and the social evaluation of BOT project. Based on the key success factors of PPP project and the analysis of the core process of the project, this paper constructs an index system with 27 primary evaluation indicators and 52 second-level indicators. The index system can be used in the whole process of BOT project performance evaluation. Secondly, the case analysis of Nanchang City wheat garden kitchen processing BOT project, through the analysis of the indicators, it is concluded that the project performance evaluation is general. In this BOT project, the performance of environmental and social benefits is general, so it is necessary to improve the technical level to get better results.
【學位授予單位】：江西財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F283

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 丁榮貴;王金安;;首席專家勝任特征與研發(fā)項目績效——組織管理環(huán)境的調節(jié)作用[J];科學學研究;2016年05期

2 劉華海;;科研項目績效評價模型和指標體系的構建[J];科研管理;2016年S1期

3 柯洪;李凌洋;劉秀娜;;政府投資基本建設項目績效評價標準系數研究[J];建筑經濟;2016年04期

4 紀鑫華;;優(yōu)化項目風險分配 實現PPP“物有所值”[J];中國財政;2015年16期

5 劉曉凱;張明;;全球視角下的PPP:內涵、模式、實踐與問題[J];國際經濟評論;2015年04期

6 伍迪;王守清;余勇軍;;政府發(fā)起B(yǎng)T模式建設工程項目的關鍵成功因素及管理對策[J];建筑經濟;2015年06期

7 孫宜迪;;BOT項目的績效評價方法探索[J];中國財政;2014年24期

8 吳宗法;馬振鵬;孟秀煥;;基于模糊神經網絡的公共項目績效評價模型研究——以發(fā)展結果為導向的理論框架構建[J];南京審計學院學報;2015年01期

9 王俊豪;付金存;;公私合作制的本質特征與中國城市公用事業(yè)的政策選擇[J];中國工業(yè)經濟;2014年07期

10 余勇軍;伍迪;王守清;;中國BT項目關鍵成功因素研究[J];工程管理學報;2014年03期

相關重要報紙文章 前2條

1 于麗;;PPP績效評價第三方機構遴選三要點[N];中國財經報;2016年

2 游亞宏;;天津開發(fā)建設項目招投標審計軟件[N];中國審計報;2006年

，

本文編號：2190173