本文選題：大同市 + 住房公積金　； 參考：《山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：大同市于1995年正式設(shè)立了住房公積金制度,直到2016年底,該制度在切實解決低收入職工家庭的住房問題、提高城鎮(zhèn)居民住房水平、發(fā)揮住房保障作用、推動大同市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展等方面做出了有力貢獻。但是,由于住房公積金制度建立時間過短、經(jīng)濟不斷發(fā)展、房價持續(xù)攀升、政策更新迅速等原因,大同市住房公積金依然存在覆蓋面狹窄、結(jié)余資金多、缺乏投資收益渠道、法律法規(guī)監(jiān)管體系不健全等缺陷。本文以山西省大同市為例,從大同市住房公積金的運行狀況展開研究,在山西省11個地級市公布的住房公積金年報的基礎(chǔ)上,遴選了高效性、營利性、安全性三大類14項指標,構(gòu)建了全面的指標體系,為后文的分析與研究奠定了基礎(chǔ)。本文主要選用客觀的量化分析方法——熵值法對大同市及山西省其他10個地級市的住房公積金運行績效做了縱向、橫向兩個維度的對比分析。首先,對2012—2015年大同市住房公積金的住房公積金貸款效率、當年增值收益、保值風(fēng)險指數(shù)等三大類14項相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進行縱向分析,得出大同市住房公積金在高效性方面呈逐年上升趨勢,但在安全、營利性方面保持的不好,有所下降。其次,在橫向維度分析方面,本文主要對包括大同市在內(nèi)的2015年度山西省11個地級市的住房公積金運行績效進行了評價與分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)大同市住房公積金在高效性方面表現(xiàn)最優(yōu),在安全性方面則不盡人意。再次,在與山西省住房公積金運行績效表現(xiàn)亮眼的城市對比,發(fā)現(xiàn)大同市住房公積金的提取效率、當年發(fā)放貸款金額、增值收益增長率等較低,再加上繳存余額多、個人住房貸款余額多、個人住房貸款逾期率等過高的原因,導(dǎo)致大同市住房公積金運行績效表現(xiàn)不佳。最后,以大同市出現(xiàn)的上述缺陷為突破口,本文提出了進一步切實拓展覆蓋面及投資收益渠道等意見,希望有所幫助。
[Abstract]:Datong City formally set up a housing provident fund system in 1995. Until the end of 2016, the system has effectively solved the housing problems of low-income workers, improved the housing level of urban residents, and played a role in housing security. Datong City to promote the development of real estate industry and other aspects made a strong contribution. However, because the housing provident fund system was established for too short a time, the economy continued to develop, house prices continued to rise, and policies were updated rapidly, the housing provident fund of Datong City still had a narrow coverage, more surplus funds, and a lack of investment income channels. Laws and regulations supervision system is not perfect and other defects. Taking Datong City of Shanxi Province as an example, this paper studies the operation status of housing accumulation fund in Datong City. On the basis of the annual report of housing accumulation fund published by 11 prefectural cities in Shanxi Province, 14 indexes of high efficiency, profit making and safety are selected. A comprehensive index system is constructed, which lays a foundation for the following analysis and research. This paper mainly chooses the objective quantitative analysis method-entropy value method to make the vertical and horizontal comparative analysis on the performance of housing accumulation fund operation in Datong city and other 10 prefectural cities in Shanxi Province. First of all, this paper makes a longitudinal analysis of 14 related data of three categories of housing provident fund loan efficiency, value-added income, and hedge risk index of Datong housing provident fund from 2012 to 2015. It is concluded that the efficiency of Datong housing accumulation fund is increasing year by year, but it is not good in safety and profit. Secondly, in the aspect of horizontal dimension analysis, this paper mainly evaluates and analyzes the performance of housing accumulation fund in 11 prefectural cities of Shanxi Province in 2015, and finds that Datong City has the best performance in terms of high efficiency. In terms of safety, it is unsatisfactory. Thirdly, compared with the cities where the performance of Shanxi housing provident fund is bright, we find that the extraction efficiency of Datong housing provident fund, the amount of loans issued in that year, the growth rate of value-added income, and so on, are lower, and the balance of deposit is more. The reasons such as excessive balance of personal housing loan and overdue rate of personal housing loan lead to poor performance of housing accumulation fund in Datong city. Finally, taking the defects mentioned above in Datong as the breakthrough point, this paper puts forward some suggestions to further expand the coverage and investment return channels, hoping to be helpful.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F299.23;F832.479

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 萬彩平;;研究我國住房公積金制度運行的績效問題[J];財經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2015年21期

2 朱喜安;魏國棟;;熵值法中無量綱化方法優(yōu)良標準的探討[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2015年02期

3 高曉蘭;;探析住房公積金沉淀資金的運營管理[J];財經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2015年01期

4 姜彤彤;;住房公積金政策調(diào)整的影響和對策建議——以濟南市為例[J];中國管理信息化;2015年01期

5 殷俊;彭聰;;基于公平視角下住房公積金權(quán)益模式改革探析[J];理論月刊;2014年11期

6 吳志宇;;論住房公積金制度主體性功能的重塑[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟探討;2014年10期

7 汪利娜;;住房公積金應(yīng)“還權(quán)賦能”[J];社會觀察;2014年09期

8 鄭方輝;喻鋒;;試論公共政策績效評價需求[J];宏觀質(zhì)量研究;2014年01期

9 佟廣軍;;關(guān)于住房公積金制度的問題及其對策[J];管理觀察;2014年04期

10 王超;;住房公積金系統(tǒng)績效管理實施策略[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟;2014年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李金萍;太原市住房公積金運行績效評價研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

2 宋豐源;山西省住房公積金政策及實施效果評估[D];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

3 陳治邦;山西省地級市住房公積金制度運行狀況比較研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

4 于靜;鄭州市住房公積金制度運行有效性評估研究[D];河南大學(xué);2014年

5 王建新;C市住房公積金管理中心信息系統(tǒng)運行績效評價[D];北京工業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

6 程宏剛;我國現(xiàn)行住房公積金制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

7 易昌軍;我國住房公積金貸款績效研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2012年

8 宋芳芳;陜西省住房公積金運行機制與效率評價研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2012年

9 謝虎;山東省棗莊市住房公積金制度績效評價研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2012年

10 肖堯;我國住房公積金運行效率研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2058285