本文選題：職業(yè)培訓 + 中美德　； 參考：《湖南師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：就業(yè)是民生之本。我國作為一個擁有十三億人口的發(fā)展中國家,當前正面臨著異常嚴峻的就業(yè)問題。黨和政府非常重視就業(yè)問題,將就業(yè)看作是改善民生、推動經(jīng)濟發(fā)展、促進社會和諧的頭等大事。我國促進就業(yè)和穩(wěn)定就業(yè)的重要途徑之一就是職業(yè)培訓,同時這也是政府解決結(jié)構性失業(yè)的根本舉措,對經(jīng)濟社會的發(fā)展有著不可或缺的作用。然而,職業(yè)培訓要想持續(xù)性發(fā)展,必須依靠法律來規(guī)范和約束。目前,我國已經(jīng)出臺了許多職業(yè)培訓的法律法規(guī),初步形成了職業(yè)培訓立法體系,并取得了一些成績,也積累了一定的寶貴經(jīng)驗。然而,從總體上來看,目前我國職業(yè)培訓立法活動多以政府為主導,法律條款多偏于倡導性建議,立法中的監(jiān)督與反饋環(huán)節(jié)也較為薄弱,職業(yè)培訓法的實施效果不盡如人意,職業(yè)培訓的發(fā)展也受到了一定的限制。一直以來,西方發(fā)達國家對職業(yè)培訓都相當重視,職業(yè)培訓立法體系也相對完善,其中頗具代表性的就有美國和德國。前者是世界頭號經(jīng)濟強國,后者以“雙元制”職業(yè)培訓而聞名世界。這兩個國家早在一百多年前就開始了職業(yè)培訓立法相關實踐的探索,并已經(jīng)形成了一套相對完善的職業(yè)培訓立法體系,積累了許多職業(yè)培訓立法的經(jīng)驗,對其他國家具有很大的借鑒價值。筆者通過相關文本研究,對中、美、德三國職業(yè)培訓立法進行對比分析,從而對我國職業(yè)培訓立法的完善提出了建議。論文從四個部分展開了論述:首先闡述了研究動機和研究意義,通過對國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀的梳理,確定了研究的思路和方法,同時還對文章所涉及的相關概念做出了界定。其次,通過查閱中、美、德三國職業(yè)培訓立法資料,對三國職業(yè)培訓立法發(fā)展脈絡進行梳理,勾畫了三國職業(yè)培訓立法形成與發(fā)展的歷史過程。再次,通過對三國職業(yè)培訓立法的主體、客體、程序進行比較,總結(jié)其各自的特征。最后,通過對三國職業(yè)培訓立法特征進行分析,反思我國職業(yè)培訓立法存在的不足,從而提出完善我國職業(yè)培訓立法的建議,即健全立法主體、修訂立法客體、調(diào)整立法程序。
[Abstract]:Employment is the foundation of people's livelihood. As a developing country with a population of 1.3 billion, China is facing a severe employment problem. The Party and the government attach great importance to the issue of employment, regard employment as the most important task to improve people's livelihood, promote economic development and promote social harmony. One of the important ways to promote and stabilize employment in China is vocational training, which is also the fundamental measure of the government to solve structural unemployment and plays an indispensable role in the development of economy and society. However, if vocational training wants to develop continuously, it must depend on law to regulate and restrict. At present, our country has issued many laws and regulations of vocational training, and has initially formed the legislative system of vocational training, and has made some achievements and accumulated some valuable experience. However, on the whole, at present, the legislative activities of vocational training in our country are dominated by the government, the provisions of the law tend to be more advocacy suggestions, the supervision and feedback links in the legislation are also relatively weak, and the effect of the implementation of the vocational training law is not satisfactory. The development of vocational training has also been limited. All along, the western developed countries attach great importance to vocational training, and the legislative system of vocational training is relatively perfect, among which the representative ones are the United States and Germany. The former is the world's largest economic power, the latter is known for its dual system of vocational training. These two countries began to explore the relevant practice of vocational training legislation more than 100 years ago, and have formed a relatively perfect system of vocational training legislation, and have accumulated a lot of experience in vocational training legislation. It has great reference value to other countries. The author makes a comparative analysis on the legislation of vocational training in China, the United States and Germany through the study of relevant texts, and puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the legislation on vocational training in China. This paper discusses from four parts: firstly, it expounds the research motivation and significance, through combing the current research situation at home and abroad, determines the research ideas and methods, at the same time, defines the related concepts involved in the article. Secondly, through consulting the legislation data of vocational training in China, the United States and Germany, the author combs the development of the legislation of vocational training in the three countries, and outlines the historical process of the formation and development of the legislation of vocational training in the three countries. Thirdly, by comparing the subjects, objects and procedures of the three countries' vocational training legislation, the author summarizes their respective characteristics. Finally, through the analysis of the legislative characteristics of vocational training in the three countries, this paper reflects on the shortcomings of the legislation on vocational training in our country, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation of vocational training in China, that is, to perfect the subject of legislation, to revise the object of legislation and to adjust the legislative procedure.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G719.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 四川省統(tǒng)計局課題組;四川工業(yè)500強比較研究[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2002年02期

2 魯運庚,尹明明;工業(yè)化時期東西方童工問題比較研究[J];甘肅社會科學;2003年03期

3 陳玉琨;教學與科研相統(tǒng)一的原則——歷史與現(xiàn)狀的比較研究[J];高等師范教育研究;2003年02期

4 方翰青;江西省地市間義務教育投資差異比較研究[J];新余高專學報;2004年03期

5 王海兵,向穎;比較法及其在會計研究中的應用[J];重慶社會科學;2005年05期

6 吳點明;;隴東老區(qū)對外開放觀念比較研究[J];隴東學院學報(社會科學版);2006年03期

7 李瑛;;淺議兩岸三地學生發(fā)展及大學生事務之比較研究[J];陜西教育(高教版);2008年06期

8 張媛;;現(xiàn)代中日民間典型婚禮禮儀比較研究[J];哈爾濱學院學報;2008年10期

9 崔文香;趙紅姬;權海善;;中韓日小學健康教育的比較研究[J];中國健康教育;2009年07期

10 石國進;魯本錄;;哲學史視域中的真理理論及其比較研究[J];理論月刊;2009年11期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 劉瑾彥;;中外大眾體育發(fā)展的比較研究[A];第3屆中國體育博士高層論壇論文集[C];2010年

2 范建榮;;政策移民與自發(fā)移民之比較研究[A];2013中國生態(tài)移民與區(qū)域發(fā)展學術研討會論文集[C];2013年

3 周學政;;現(xiàn)代化比較的再思考[A];現(xiàn)代化的機遇與挑戰(zhàn)——第八期中國現(xiàn)代化研究論壇論文集[C];2010年

4 郭嶸;盧軍;吳松濤;;我國生活質(zhì)量指標的比較研究[A];2004城市規(guī)劃年會論文集（下）[C];2004年

5 邢占軍;;城鄉(xiāng)居民主觀幸福感初步比較研究[A];第十屆全國心理學學術大會論文摘要集[C];2005年

6 趙小風;黃賢金;付重林;吳小根;;我國高等教育資源環(huán)境與城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃管理專業(yè)課程體系比較研究[A];中國地理學會2007年學術年會論文摘要集[C];2007年

7 趙小云;郭成;;不同民族中學生學業(yè)自我發(fā)展的比較研究[A];中國社會心理學會2008年全國學術大會論文摘要集[C];2008年

8 楊金華;;詞典比較研究的基礎和目標[A];中國辭書學會第六屆中青年辭書工作者學術研討會論文集[C];2010年

9 姚政邑;石千里;;國內(nèi)高校廣告實驗室建設比較研究[A];北京高校實驗室工作研究會2010年年會優(yōu)秀論文[C];2011年

10 姜秀山;;科技進步速度評價方法及其應用的比較研究[A];面向復雜系統(tǒng)的管理理論與信息系統(tǒng)技術學術會議專輯[C];2000年

，

本文編號：2113953