【摘要】：目的了解大學生主觀職業(yè)障礙與人格特征的關系,探索影響大學生主觀職業(yè)障礙的人格因素。方法采用大學生主觀職業(yè)障礙職前問卷和大五人格簡式量表對北京某大學165名大學生進行測試。結果總體上,男生和女生的主觀職業(yè)障礙總分不存在顯著差異(t=1.26,P0.05);農(nóng)村學生的主觀職業(yè)障礙總分顯著高于城市學生的主觀職業(yè)障礙總分(t=3.17,P0.01);大學生主觀職業(yè)障礙與宜人性(r=0.215,P0.01)、神經(jīng)質(r=0.387,P0.01)有非常顯著的正相關;神經(jīng)質變量對主觀職業(yè)障礙具有顯著的正向預測作用(R2=0.15,P0.01)。結論主觀職業(yè)障礙不存在性別差異;農(nóng)村學生的主觀職業(yè)障礙顯著高于城市學生;人格中的神經(jīng)質因子對大學生主觀職業(yè)障礙有正向預測作用,高神經(jīng)質個體面對求職會感受到更多的障礙和心理壓力,體驗到更多的消極情緒。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between subjective occupational disorders and personality characteristics of college students and explore the personality factors affecting them. Methods 165 college students in a certain university in Beijing were tested by pre-employment questionnaire and five-year personality scale. Results on the whole, there was no significant difference between boys and girls in the total score of subjective occupational disorders (t = 1.26P 0.05), and the total score of subjective occupational disorders of rural students was significantly higher than that of urban students (t = 3.17p 0.01). There was a significant positive correlation between subjective occupational disorders and pleasant humanity (r = 0.215P 0.01) and neuroticism (r = 0.387 / P 0.01). Neuroticism variables had a significant positive predictive effect on subjective occupational disorders (R2C0.15P0.01). Conclusion there is no gender difference in subjective occupational disorders, and the subjective occupational barriers of rural students are significantly higher than those of urban students. The neurotic factors in personality can positively predict the subjective occupational disorders of college students. The highly neurotic individuals will feel more obstacles and psychological pressure and experience more negative emotions in the face of job hunting.
【作者單位】： 北京聯(lián)合大學師范學院;
【分類號】：B844.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭顯亮;顧海根;徐雷;;850名大學生網(wǎng)戀態(tài)度調查[J];中國校醫(yī);2008年05期

2 侯依蘭;心理衛(wèi)生課程教育對低年級大學生SCL-90評分的影響[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2005年04期

3 何群杰;張睿;;大學生主觀幸福感的實驗研究[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2010年02期

4 凌宇;朱翠英;劉文俐;;不同類型高校大學生應對方式的比較研究[J];中國校醫(yī);2008年05期

5 馬s，

本文編號：2295619