第31屆里約奧運(yùn)會中國男籃與前四強(qiáng)男籃快攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)對比研究
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of modern basketball techniques and tactics, basketball offensive tactics are also constantly developing. The scientific training techniques and means also make athletes' physical conditions constantly break through the limits. The development of individual skills and physical conditions also greatly improves the appreciation of the competition. In basketball games, the team adopts a variety of offensive tactics, but with the continuous development and progress of basketball, fast attack and defense, high-strength confrontation, to win quickly are the indispensable contents of modern basketball offensive tactics. Fast attack tactics adapt to the development characteristics of modern basketball with high speed. The appreciation and timeliness of fast attack can also reveal the essence of basketball from the side. At the same time, fast-break tactics are also effective offensive tactics that can quickly catch points and boost the morale of their players and to a certain extent attack the defensive momentum when the team falls behind. The use of fast-break tactics is also an important indicator of a team's offensive ability. This article uses the literature method, the questionnaire survey method, the video analysis method, This paper makes a comparative study on the use of fast break tactics in the men's basketball competition of the 31st Rio Olympic Games in 2016 and the top four men's basketball teams by means of mathematical analysis and other methods. The following results are obtained: 1. The number of fastbreak, direct scoring and the percentage of direct scoring in the total score of the Chinese men's basketball team at the 31st Rio Olympic Games are significantly different from those of the American men's basketball team, the Serbian men's basketball team and the Australian men's basketball team, among which the American men's basketball team is in the fast break number. The direct score of fast break and the total score are the highest in the top four. Compared with the American men's basketball, Serbian men's basketball, Spanish men's basketball and Australian men's basketball, the direct success rate of fast break is obviously lower than that of American men's basketball team, Serbian men's basketball team, Spanish men's basketball team and Australian men's basketball team. The Serbian men's basketball team is the highest in the top four. In the 31st Rio Olympic Games, the Chinese men's basketball team was launched in the form of steals and blocks, because there was no guarantee of backcourt rebounds. Therefore, the Chinese men's basketball in the backcourt rebounds launched fast break than the top four teams account for a lower proportion. The Chinese men's basketball team is mainly started by the defenders, while the top four teams are scattered. The Chinese men's basketball team and the top four teams are based on no support, and the Chinese men's basketball team is based on the fixed support under the condition of receiving, and the top four teams generally adopt the motor relay. 3. The 31 st Rio Olympic Games Chinese men's basketball team mainly by the individual breakthrough advancement, the first four top four teams are mainly by the transmission and transportation union advancement. China's men's basketball team to 1-2 people to participate in the propulsion and no pass to advance, the process of propulsion among the players do not respond to more cooperation is only tacit understanding, the speed of propulsion is not fast. 4. Compared with the top four teams of the Chinese men's basketball team in the 31st Rio Olympic Games, all the top four teams in the Chinese men's basketball team end up with direct layup and shooting, and the proportion of fouls is higher than that of the top four teams, which shows that the Chinese men's basketball team still has a certain impact. But at the end of the three-point, because the Chinese men's basketball team does not have the stable three-point projection point, the Chinese men's basketball team is obviously inferior to the top four teams in the end of the three-point ball.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:G841
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 邵冠群;中國男籃奧運(yùn)失利原因探析[J];中國體育教練員;2000年04期
2 孫繼新,齊建國;中國男籃現(xiàn)狀分析與對策研究[J];延邊大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2004年01期
3 呂杰;從22屆亞錦賽中、韓之戰(zhàn)看中國男籃的發(fā)展[J];遼寧體育科技;2004年02期
4 丁麗萍;從第22屆亞錦賽中、韓之戰(zhàn)看中國男籃在發(fā)展中存在的問題[J];西安體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年06期
5 岳建軍;對第28屆奧運(yùn)會中國男籃與對手比賽情況的對比與分析[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報;2005年07期
6 寧峰;第28屆奧運(yùn)會中國男籃的內(nèi)外線攻擊能力分析[J];體育科學(xué)研究;2005年03期
7 陳莊;;從第23屆亞洲男籃錦標(biāo)賽剖析中國男籃的現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[J];福建體育科技;2005年06期
8 郭永東;歐洲籃球的飛躍與中國男籃的發(fā)展[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期
9 趙鋒;中國男籃的奧運(yùn)表現(xiàn)及發(fā)展方向[J];遼寧體育科技;2005年02期
10 高敏,龐輝;從28屆奧運(yùn)會看中國男籃快攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)差距和發(fā)展對策[J];沈陽體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年02期
相關(guān)會議論文 前10條
1 霍子文;丁麗萍;;關(guān)于中國男籃提高控制進(jìn)攻節(jié)奏能力的對策研究——由第28屆奧運(yùn)會中國男籃臨場表現(xiàn)想到的[A];中華人民共和國第十屆運(yùn)動會科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編[C];2005年
2 郭杰;閆焱;;探究影響中國男籃隊(duì)員球場暴力的因素[A];第6屆全國青年體育科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2011年
3 齊春燕;孫殿恩;王來東;;從雅典奧運(yùn)會看中國男籃的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢[A];中華人民共和國第十屆運(yùn)動會科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編[C];2005年
4 常冬冬;高峰;梁輝;王志昂;王光明;;備戰(zhàn)2008奧運(yùn)會中國男籃實(shí)力的分析研究[A];第八屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編(一)[C];2007年
5 朱曉峰;;第29屆奧運(yùn)會中國男籃快攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征分析[A];2013體育計算機(jī)應(yīng)用論文集[C];2013年
6 張勇;趙杰修;米靖;苗向軍;顧春雨;;北京奧運(yùn)會中國男籃對手技戰(zhàn)術(shù)分析與高水平男籃比賽負(fù)荷的研究[A];中華人民共和國第十一屆運(yùn)動會科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編[C];2009年
7 朱建國;徐為人;;29屆奧運(yùn)會中國男籃與歐洲強(qiáng)隊(duì)籃板球的調(diào)研[A];中華人民共和國第十一屆運(yùn)動會科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編[C];2009年
8 劉永峰;;備戰(zhàn)倫敦奧運(yùn)會中國男籃整體實(shí)力分析[A];第九屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編(3)[C];2011年
9 李慧林;王潤斌;;國家男籃各項(xiàng)技術(shù)統(tǒng)計指標(biāo)和比賽成績的相關(guān)分析——兼論2006年世界男籃錦標(biāo)賽中國男籃實(shí)力[A];第八屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編(一)[C];2007年
10 李慧林;;中國男籃不同位置運(yùn)動員比賽能力與世界八強(qiáng)球隊(duì)的比較研究——第十四屆世界男籃錦標(biāo)賽中國男籃失利分析[A];第十五屆全國高校田徑科研論文報告會論文專輯[C];2005年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 張品;白喜林:中國男籃必須知難而上[N];中國體育報;2008年
2 吳建珍;“暴龍”能否拯救中國男籃?[N];人民日報海外版;2013年
3 葉柯;中國男籃的冬天有多長[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報道;2013年
4 本報記者 張清晨;中國男籃透支消費(fèi)進(jìn)入還債期[N];濟(jì)南日報;2013年
5 本報記者 郎成;中國男籃:成長的煩惱[N];工人日報;2014年
6 本報記者 王東;宮魯鳴:中國男籃要調(diào)整[N];光明日報;2014年
7 本報記者 薛原;中國男籃:亞錦賽只是起點(diǎn)[N];人民日報;2001年
8 記者薛原;中國男籃邀世界勁旅熱身[N];人民日報;2002年
9 本報記者 薛原;中國男籃:再闖前八非坦途[N];人民日報;2002年
10 記者王鏡宇;中國男籃 封閉集訓(xùn)[N];人民日報;2003年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 任文曉;對中國男籃進(jìn)攻失誤現(xiàn)象的分析[D];河南大學(xué);2011年
2 張建平;第十六屆亞運(yùn)會中國男籃和伊朗男籃攻守能力比較研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年
3 姚健;中國男籃2008年奧運(yùn)會參賽風(fēng)險的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2008年
4 何欣;第30屆奧運(yùn)會中國男籃與對手進(jìn)攻方式比較研究[D];河南大學(xué);2013年
5 劉崗生;2012年倫敦奧運(yùn)會中國男籃與比賽對手失誤特征的比較研究[D];西安體育學(xué)院;2013年
6 王在和;對中國男籃在第26屆亞錦賽和第30屆奧運(yùn)會中進(jìn)攻失誤的研究[D];河南師范大學(xué);2013年
7 張萬欣;第27屆亞錦賽中國男籃與對手進(jìn)攻能力的對比研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2015年
8 宋東升;中國男籃大前鋒與世界優(yōu)秀大前鋒進(jìn)攻能力的比較研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2015年
9 蔣海強(qiáng);第二十七屆亞錦賽中國男籃與前四強(qiáng)中鋒個人攻防技術(shù)指標(biāo)對比研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2015年
10 宋濤;從亞錦賽看中國男籃的優(yōu)勢轉(zhuǎn)移現(xiàn)象[D];福建師范大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號:2171670
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2171670.html