本文選題：自主招生 + 綜合素質(zhì)�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：加強(qiáng)和改進(jìn)高校自主招生過(guò)程中的學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)是全面提升高等教育質(zhì)量的必然要求。科學(xué)開(kāi)展高校自主招生過(guò)程中的學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)，一是要貫徹全面實(shí)施素質(zhì)教育的核心與重點(diǎn)，緊緊圍繞“解決好培養(yǎng)什么人、怎樣培養(yǎng)人”這一核心問(wèn)題，重點(diǎn)考察學(xué)生是否具有服務(wù)國(guó)家服務(wù)人民的社會(huì)責(zé)任感，勇于探索的創(chuàng)新精神和善于解決問(wèn)題的實(shí)踐能力；二是要遵循人才學(xué)關(guān)于人才的本質(zhì)規(guī)定性，選好“準(zhǔn)人才”，從生理素質(zhì)、心理素質(zhì)、智能素質(zhì)和思想道德素質(zhì)等方面要測(cè)評(píng)學(xué)生的內(nèi)在素質(zhì)，考察學(xué)生是否具備實(shí)踐成才、自學(xué)成才的基本素養(yǎng)；三是要遵循學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)容與要求，重點(diǎn)測(cè)評(píng)學(xué)生的思想品德、公民素養(yǎng)、學(xué)習(xí)實(shí)踐與創(chuàng)新能力、交流合作能力、健康狀況、審美與表現(xiàn)能力，嚴(yán)格實(shí)施動(dòng)態(tài)的發(fā)展性的、全面客觀的、定性與定量相結(jié)合的評(píng)價(jià)。 我國(guó)高校自主招生的發(fā)展大致經(jīng)歷了初步嘗試、深化試點(diǎn)和穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)這三個(gè)階段。當(dāng)前的高校自主招生呈現(xiàn)出類(lèi)型多元化、影響范圍擴(kuò)大化、選拔類(lèi)型多樣化、評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)全面化的階段性特征，，也存在六個(gè)亟待解決的突出問(wèn)題：一是評(píng)價(jià)較集中于中間環(huán)節(jié)，缺乏系統(tǒng)規(guī)劃和反饋；二是筆試和面試權(quán)重設(shè)置不合理，題目設(shè)計(jì)科學(xué)性有待提高；三是測(cè)評(píng)內(nèi)容缺乏科學(xué)性；四是評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)難以量化；五是評(píng)價(jià)模型過(guò)于復(fù)雜，后期數(shù)據(jù)處理成本費(fèi)用較大；六是試點(diǎn)高校各自為戰(zhàn)，不利于自主招生格局的完善。 根據(jù)測(cè)評(píng)指標(biāo)體系和測(cè)評(píng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)體系建立的原則，通過(guò)當(dāng)前社會(huì)對(duì)大學(xué)生素質(zhì)的認(rèn)知分析，結(jié)合學(xué)生全面發(fā)展的需要，運(yùn)用專(zhuān)家訪談法、問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法等方法嘗試性地建立高校自主招生過(guò)程中學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)測(cè)評(píng)模型。同時(shí)為了較好的反映指標(biāo)的重要性程度，使用層次分析法確定了自主招生過(guò)程中學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)測(cè)評(píng)指標(biāo)體系的權(quán)重，設(shè)計(jì)了綜合素質(zhì)測(cè)評(píng)實(shí)施方法，采用定性和定量?jī)煞N方法考核學(xué)生的綜合素質(zhì)，并對(duì)實(shí)施方法和問(wèn)卷的具體使用給予了詳細(xì)說(shuō)明。該評(píng)價(jià)模型具有較強(qiáng)的靈活性和指導(dǎo)性，高校在使用過(guò)程中可以根據(jù)自身的需求重新調(diào)整各指標(biāo)權(quán)重，也可以重新編制問(wèn)卷，設(shè)計(jì)新的測(cè)評(píng)實(shí)施方法。
[Abstract]:To strengthen and improve the comprehensive quality evaluation of college students in the process of independent enrollment is the necessary requirement to improve the quality of higher education.To carry out the comprehensive quality evaluation of students in the process of independent enrollment in colleges and universities scientifically, one is to carry out the core and focus of quality education in an all-round way, and closely revolve around the core question of "who to train and how to cultivate people".It is important to examine whether students have a sense of social responsibility to serve the country and serve the people, a spirit of innovation that is brave to explore, and a practical ability to be good at solving problems; second, to follow the essential requirements of talent learning, and to select "prospective talents".From the aspects of physiological quality, psychological quality, intelligence quality and ideological and moral quality, it is necessary to evaluate the students' internal quality, and to investigate whether the students have the basic accomplishment of becoming talents in practice and learning by themselves.Third, it is necessary to follow the contents and requirements of the comprehensive quality evaluation of students, with emphasis on assessing students' ideological and moral character, civic literacy, learning practice and innovative ability, communication and cooperation ability, health status, aesthetic and expressive ability.Strictly implement dynamic developmental, comprehensive, objective, qualitative and quantitative evaluation.The development of independent enrollment in colleges and universities in our country has experienced three stages: initial attempt, deepening the pilot program and steadily advancing these three stages.There are six outstanding problems to be solved in the present independent enrollment of colleges and universities, such as diversification of types, enlargement of influence scope, diversification of selection types and comprehensive evaluation index. One is that the evaluation is more concentrated in the middle link.Lack of systematic planning and feedback; second, the weight of written test and interview setting unreasonable, subject design need to be improved; third, evaluation content is not scientific; fourth, evaluation index is difficult to quantify; fifth, the evaluation model is too complex,The cost of data processing in the later period is higher; sixth, the experimental universities are fighting their own way, which is not conducive to the perfection of the pattern of independent enrollment.According to the principles of the evaluation index system and the evaluation standard system, through the cognitive analysis of college students' quality in the current society, combined with the needs of the students' all-round development, the method of expert interview is used.This paper attempts to establish a comprehensive quality assessment model for students in the process of independent enrollment by means of questionnaire.At the same time, in order to better reflect the importance of the indicators, using the Analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of the evaluation index system of students' comprehensive quality in the process of independent enrollment, the implementation method of comprehensive quality evaluation is designed.Both qualitative and quantitative methods are used to assess the students' comprehensive quality, and the implementation method and the specific use of the questionnaire are explained in detail.The evaluation model has strong flexibility and guidance. In the process of use, colleges and universities can readjust the weight of each index according to their own needs, or they can recompile the questionnaire and design a new method of evaluation and implementation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G647

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張文軍;英國(guó)14-19歲普通教育考試制度與高校入學(xué)機(jī)制的關(guān)系研究[J];比較教育研究;2004年07期

2 楊繼龍;但昭彬;;中韓兩國(guó)高考制度改革之比較[J];滁州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

3 王立科;;英國(guó)高校自主招生的實(shí)踐及其啟示[J];高等工程教育研究;2009年01期

4 宋麗;孟祥麗;;落實(shí)高校招生自主權(quán)的障礙與對(duì)策分析[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

5 楊德廣;;兩種“自主招生”改革之剖析[J];湖北招生考試;2006年08期

6 張亞群;;高校自主招考的制度選擇[J];湖北招生考試;2006年16期

7 尹秋蓮;;英國(guó)高校招生考試機(jī)構(gòu)及其特點(diǎn)[J];湖北招生考試;2012年12期

8 劉向榮;美國(guó)高校招生制度的特點(diǎn)與成因探析[J];黑龍江高教研究;2005年03期

9 王倩;試論素質(zhì)教育的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];河南商業(yè)高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

10 劉自團(tuán);高校試行自主選拔錄取的公平與效率問(wèn)題[J];理工高教研究;2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 樊本富;中國(guó)高校自主招生研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1752448