本文選題：教育元評(píng)估 + 理論��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2010年博士論文

【摘要】： 本研究立足現(xiàn)實(shí),審視了我國(guó)教育評(píng)估實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域中面臨的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境,分析了教育評(píng)估專業(yè)化發(fā)展過(guò)程中的瓶頸問(wèn)題,試圖探索一條能推進(jìn)我國(guó)教育評(píng)估規(guī)范發(fā)展的路徑——教育元評(píng)估。教育元評(píng)估的本質(zhì)是依據(jù)教育評(píng)估的專業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對(duì)教育評(píng)估進(jìn)行價(jià)值判斷,教育元評(píng)估的目的是改善教育評(píng)估活動(dòng),提升教育評(píng)估質(zhì)量,最大程度發(fā)揮教育評(píng)估功能。對(duì)教育元評(píng)估的重視是教育評(píng)估理論與實(shí)踐走向成熟的重要標(biāo)志。本研究對(duì)于促進(jìn)教育評(píng)估理論體系的完善,指導(dǎo)教育評(píng)估實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域的優(yōu)化,將具有一定的開(kāi)拓意義,同時(shí)也期望教育元評(píng)估的實(shí)證研究,能為教育評(píng)估學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)踐者提供一個(gè)系統(tǒng)反思和理性提升的工具,并進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)教育評(píng)估邁向科學(xué)化、專業(yè)化和規(guī)范化的發(fā)展之路。 本研究從理論基礎(chǔ)分析、制度層面借鑒和實(shí)證操作探索三個(gè)層次開(kāi)展了相關(guān)研究。在理論基礎(chǔ)分析部分,對(duì)“元”意識(shí)的哲學(xué)內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了較為深入的闡釋,明確了元評(píng)估是對(duì)評(píng)估本身的一種反思和總結(jié),是更高一層次的批判和審視,是通過(guò)發(fā)揮分析的科學(xué)功能去推動(dòng)教育評(píng)估理論自身的完善和發(fā)展。同時(shí),從系統(tǒng)科學(xué)的控制論中尋找到反饋控制原理作為教育元評(píng)估的方法論基礎(chǔ),從而推演出教育元評(píng)估在整個(gè)教育評(píng)估復(fù)雜系統(tǒng)中不可替代的重要作用,體現(xiàn)了教育元評(píng)估在優(yōu)化和改進(jìn)教育評(píng)估活動(dòng)中的實(shí)踐價(jià)值。 在制度借鑒的研究部分,研究探討了美國(guó)教育元評(píng)估的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化發(fā)展歷程和荷蘭教育元評(píng)估的制度化形成特點(diǎn),因?yàn)樵u(píng)估的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化是推進(jìn)美國(guó)教育評(píng)估行業(yè)自律和教育評(píng)估專業(yè)化的重要途徑,而荷蘭高等教育元評(píng)估制度作為整個(gè)國(guó)家高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系的一個(gè)重要組成部分,對(duì)改善和提升高等教育質(zhì)量發(fā)揮了極其重要的作用。期望這些探究能為我國(guó)構(gòu)建教育元評(píng)估制度,加強(qiáng)教育評(píng)估專業(yè)化發(fā)展產(chǎn)生重要的借鑒作用。 在最后的實(shí)證研究部分,采用Delphi法研制了一套符合我國(guó)地域文化特點(diǎn)和教育評(píng)估現(xiàn)狀的教育元評(píng)估指標(biāo),作為實(shí)踐教育元評(píng)估的工具,并通過(guò)個(gè)案分析,選取了上海市民辦職業(yè)培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)誠(chéng)信等級(jí)評(píng)定進(jìn)行元評(píng)估實(shí)證研究,從目標(biāo)適切性、方案可行性、過(guò)程精確性和結(jié)果有效性四項(xiàng)基本要素的角度,對(duì)原評(píng)估的質(zhì)量進(jìn)行了評(píng)判,為原評(píng)估的委托方、結(jié)果使用者和評(píng)估專業(yè)機(jī)構(gòu)提供了有益建議,也作為教育元評(píng)估指標(biāo)的一次試測(cè),提供了元評(píng)估的實(shí)踐操作范本。
[Abstract]:Based on reality, this study examines the practical difficulties in the field of educational evaluation in China, and analyzes the bottleneck problems in the process of professional development of educational evaluation. This paper attempts to explore a path that can promote the development of educational evaluation norms in China-educational meta-evaluation. The essence of educational meta-assessment is to judge the value of educational evaluation according to the professional standard of educational evaluation. The purpose of educational meta-evaluation is to improve the activities of educational evaluation, improve the quality of educational evaluation, and give full play to the function of educational evaluation. The importance of educational meta-assessment is an important symbol of the maturation of educational evaluation theory and practice. This study is of great significance for improving the theoretical system of educational evaluation and guiding the optimization of educational evaluation practice. At the same time, it also expects the empirical study of educational meta-assessment. It can provide a tool of systematic reflection and rational improvement for the academic circles and practitioners of educational evaluation, and further promote the development of educational evaluation towards a scientific, professional and standardized way. This research has carried out the related research from the theoretical foundation analysis, the system level reference and the demonstration operation exploration. In the part of theoretical basis analysis, the philosophical connotation of "meta-consciousness" is explained in depth, and it is clear that meta-evaluation is a reflection and summary of evaluation itself, and a higher level of criticism and examination. It is through exerting the scientific function of analysis to promote the perfection and development of educational evaluation theory itself. At the same time, from the cybernetics of system science, the principle of feedback control is found as the methodological basis of educational meta-evaluation, and the important role of EMA in the whole complex system of educational evaluation is deduced. It reflects the practical value of educational meta-evaluation in optimizing and improving educational evaluation activities. In the research part of institutional reference, the paper discusses the development of standardization of educational meta-assessment in the United States and the characteristics of institutionalization of educational meta-assessment in the Netherlands. Because the standardization of meta-assessment is an important way to promote self-discipline and professionalization of educational evaluation in the United States, and the Dutch meta-evaluation system of higher education is an important part of the quality assurance system of higher education in the whole country. It plays an extremely important role in improving and improving the quality of higher education. It is hoped that these explorations can provide an important reference for the construction of educational meta-evaluation system and the strengthening of the professional development of educational evaluation in China. In the last part of the empirical study, a set of educational meta-evaluation indexes, which accord with the characteristics of regional culture and the present situation of educational evaluation in China, are developed by using Delphi method as a tool of practical educational meta-assessment, and the case study is carried out. This paper selects the credit grade evaluation of private vocational training institutions in Shanghai to carry on the meta-evaluation empirical research, and evaluates the quality of the original evaluation from the four basic factors of goal suitability, scheme feasibility, process accuracy and result validity. It provides useful suggestions for the principal of the original evaluation, the users of the results and the professional organizations of evaluation, and also provides a practical model for the meta-evaluation as a test of the educational meta-evaluation index.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：G40

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 范輝君;;高職人才培養(yǎng)水平評(píng)估的元評(píng)估研究[J];重慶電子工程職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

2 霍國(guó)強(qiáng);;我國(guó)教育元評(píng)價(jià)的實(shí)踐缺失及對(duì)策思考[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2012年Z2期

，

本文編號(hào)：2115948