本文選題：反映能力問卷中文版 + 反映能力��； 參考：《中國臨床心理學雜志》2017年02期

【摘要】：目的:在大學生樣本和臨床樣本中檢驗反映能力問卷中文版(Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire,RFQ-C)的信度和效度。方法:選取657名大學生和134例臨床心理科的來訪者填寫RFQ-C,其中114名大學生在間隔1-2周后完成RFQ-C重測;采用人格障礙診斷問卷第4版中的邊緣性人格障礙分量表、基本共情量表及多倫多述情障礙量表作為效標。結(jié)果:(1)大學生樣本中,反映能力的Cronbach’sα系數(shù)為0.654,重測信度為0.687;反映能力與邊緣性人格傾向存在顯著負相關(guān)(r=-0.180)。(2)臨床樣本中,反映能力的Cronbach’sα系數(shù)為0.715;邊緣性人格傾向組反映能力得分顯著低于非邊緣性人格傾向組,反映能力與邊緣性人格傾向(r=-0.304)、述情障礙量表總分(r=-0.382)及其中的情感識別困難(r=-0.433)、情感描述困難(r=-0.311)均存在顯著負相關(guān);反映能力與認知共情相關(guān)顯著(r=0.173)。結(jié)論:反映能力問卷中文版的信度和效度基本達到心理測量學的要求。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of reflective function questionnaire in college students and clinical samples. Methods: 657 college students and 134 clinical cardiology visitors were selected to fill in RFQ-C, 114 of them completed the RFQ-C retest after 1-2 weeks interval, and the borderline personality disorder component form of the fourth edition of the Personality Disorder Diagnostic questionnaire was used. The basic empathy scale and the Toronto alexithymia scale were used as effective criteria. Results among the college students, the Cronbachs 偽 coefficient and test-retest reliability were 0.654 and 0.687, respectively, and there was a significant negative correlation between the ability to reflect and the borderline personality tendency. The Cronbachs 偽 coefficient of the ability to reflect was 0.715, and the score of the ability of reflection in the borderline personality tendency group was significantly lower than that in the non-marginal personality tendency group. There was a significant negative correlation between the ability to reflect and the borderline personality tendency, the total score of the alexithymia scale, and the affective identification difficulties (r-0.433) and the affective description difficulty (r-0.311), and the correlation between the reflecting ability and the cognitive empathy was significant (0.173). Conclusion: the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of reflective competence questionnaire basically meet the requirements of psychometrics.
【作者單位】： 中南大學湘雅三醫(yī)院;中國醫(yī)科大學盛京醫(yī)院;
【分類號】：R395.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 李晨楓;呂銳;劉潔;鐘杰;;基本共情量表在中國青少年群體中的初步修訂[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2011年02期

2 張春雨;張進輔;張靜秋;張?zhí)O平;;述情障礙成因的認知及社會機制[J];心理科學進展;2011年03期

3 蟻金瑤,姚樹橋,朱熊兆;TAS-20中文版的信度、效度分析[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2003年11期

4 楊蘊萍,沈東郁,王久英,楊堅;人格障礙診斷問卷(PDQ-4+)在中國應(yīng)用的信效度研究[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2002年03期

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 栗明云;;好課尚需好板書[J];老年教育(老年大學);2009年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 記者 張彥彥;努力提高社情民意信息反映能力[N];濟寧日報;2014年

2 山東省無棣縣第二實驗學校 丁金娥;讓學生學會傾聽[N];學知報;2011年

，

本文編號：2040717