本文選題：作業(yè)策略 + 作業(yè)策略問卷　； 參考：《上海師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：一直以來，學習策略都是學習心理學的研宄熱點。作業(yè)是學生極為重要的學習活動，而作業(yè)策略更是學生的學習結(jié)果、認知結(jié)構(gòu)與寶貴潛能的結(jié)合。研究作業(yè)策略具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義和理論意義。本研宄以高中生為被試，，首先編制了作業(yè)策略問卷，調(diào)查了高中生的作業(yè)策略現(xiàn)狀；然后使用情景實驗對不同策略水平的學生進行了深入的探討；最后，開展了作業(yè)策略計對性輔導，并得到以下結(jié)論： (1)高中生作業(yè)策略內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)包括作業(yè)計劃策略、作業(yè)思維策略、作業(yè)情緒策略、作業(yè)反省策略、作業(yè)態(tài)度策略、作業(yè)元認知策略與作業(yè)抗干擾策略七個維度，共41個項目；作業(yè)策略問卷具有良好的信度和效度。 (2)高中生作業(yè)策略水平處于中等水平。 (3)高中生作業(yè)策略存在顯著的性別、年級、班級與生源地差異。在性別上，女生的心態(tài)更為積極，男生更傾向于對作業(yè)進行反��；在年級上，作業(yè)策略水平基本隨年級的升高而降低，高一年級作業(yè)策略最好，高一與高二之間差異較小，高三與其他兩個年級之間差異較大；在班級上，文科班與實驗班的學生對自己作業(yè)能力的認識更為積極；在生源地上，市區(qū)學生的作業(yè)策略水平顯著高于郊區(qū)學生； (4)學業(yè)成績與作業(yè)策略之問的相關(guān)關(guān)系為低正相關(guān)，即作業(yè)策略的優(yōu)劣分僅能在一定程度上預測學業(yè)成績水平，反之亦然。 (5)策略好的學優(yōu)生、策略差的學優(yōu)生、策略好的學困生與策略差的學困生之間在總分和各維度上均存在顯著差異，策略好的學優(yōu)生作業(yè)筐得分最商。 (6)策略輔導能有效提高學生的策略水平。除策略好的學優(yōu)生作業(yè)策略水平排第一，顯著高于策略差的學困生外，其余三組間差異均不顯著。策略輔導對策略差的學生更有效。
[Abstract]:Learning strategy has been a hot topic in learning psychology . It is a very important learning activity for students , and the operation strategy is the combination of students ' learning results , cognitive structure and precious potential . The research work strategy has important realistic meaning and theoretical significance .
Then , the situation experiment was used to probe into the students with different strategy levels .
Finally , the operational strategy plan is carried out and the following conclusions are obtained :

( 1 ) The internal structure of high school students ' work strategy includes seven dimensions of operation planning strategy , operational thinking strategy , job emotion strategy , operation introspection strategy , operation attitude strategy , job meta - cognition strategy and operation anti - interference strategy , and 41 projects ;
The job strategy questionnaire has good reliability and validity .

( 2 ) The level of high school students ' homework strategy is in the middle level .

( 3 ) There are significant differences in gender , grade , class and source of life in high school students .
In the first grade , the level of the operation strategy is basically decreased with the increase of the grade , and the strategy of the first grade is the best , the difference between the height one and the second grade is small , the difference between the high three and the other two grades is larger ;
In the class , the students of the study class and the experiment class are more active about their ability to work ;
The operating strategy level of students in urban areas is significantly higher than those in suburban areas .


( 4 ) The correlation between the academic achievement and the question of the operation strategy is low positive correlation , that is , the quality score of the operation strategy can only predict the level of the academic performance to a certain extent , and vice versa .

( 5 ) There are significant differences in the total score and each dimension among the students with good strategic learning , poor strategy , good strategy and poor strategy .

( 6 ) The strategy counseling can effectively improve the students ' strategy level , except that the strategy is better than that of the poor students , the differences between the three groups are not significant . The strategy counseling is more effective for students with poor strategies .
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G632.4;G442

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳以潔;不同層次高校大學生時間管理傾向的差異研究[J];佛山科學技術(shù)學院學報(社會科學版);2004年06期

2 蘇遠連;張耀冰;;西方外語學習策略訓練研究綜述[J];國外外語教學;2003年03期

3 姜麗華;優(yōu)化小學生課外作業(yè)反饋環(huán)節(jié)的研究[J];教育科學;2001年04期

4 邱鵬;;小學英語有效作業(yè)策略[J];江蘇教育研究;2011年20期

5 唐藝菲;大學生英語學習自我調(diào)控行為與英語學習成績[J];山東外語教學;2002年06期

6 王凱榮,辛濤,李瓊;中學生自我效能感、歸因與學習成績關(guān)系的研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;1999年04期

7 樊琪;朱蕾;;中學生筆記策略及其干預研究[J];心理科學;2007年06期

本文編號：1939549