【摘要】：中國文獻學歷史悠久,古有校讎學之謂。自近代以來,文獻學學科體系的演變經(jīng)歷了大致三個階段:民國初期由"校讎學"變身"文獻學"初期的學科體系;1980年代以版本學、�？睂W、目錄學組成的"三位一體"結(jié)構(gòu)為基礎(chǔ)的文獻學學科體系;1990年代至21世紀初的"大文獻學"學科體系。論文比較分析了這三個階段文獻學學科體系的基本特點和存在不足,指出:研究對象和核心研究內(nèi)容是文獻學區(qū)別于其他學科的本質(zhì)屬性,理應成為構(gòu)建文獻學學科體系的基石;在當今學科大融合的趨勢下,以時代性將文獻學劃分為看似本質(zhì)不同的傳統(tǒng)文獻學和現(xiàn)代文獻學已不合時宜;文獻學學科體系的建立應內(nèi)外有別,注意突出學科的核心內(nèi)容,防止學科的泛化。以此為基礎(chǔ),作者嘗試構(gòu)建了以文獻學研究對象和核心研究內(nèi)容為基礎(chǔ)的全新的文獻學學科體系。
[Abstract]:Chinese philology has a long history. Since modern times, the evolution of the discipline system of philology has undergone three stages: the subject system of the early period of the Republic of China changed from "collation" to "philology" in the 1980s by means of edition and collation. The subject system of bibliography is based on the trinity structure of bibliography from 1990's to the beginning of the 21st century. This paper compares and analyzes the basic characteristics and shortcomings of the discipline system of philology in these three stages, and points out that the object of study and the core contents of research are the essential attributes of philology which are different from other disciplines. It should be the cornerstone of constructing the subject system of philology, and it is out of date to divide philology into traditional philology and modern philology, which appear to be different in nature. The establishment of the subject system of philology should be different from that of the outside, pay attention to the core contents of the discipline and prevent the generalization of the subject. On this basis, the author tries to construct a new subject system of philology based on the research object and core contents of philology.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學信息管理學院;
【基金】：湖北省教育廳高校哲學社會科學研究重大項目“湖北省民國文獻資源的保護與開發(fā)利用”(15ZD004)的研究成果之一
【分類號】：G256-4;G642

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 田方斌,李惠明;文獻學學科體系論略[J];圖書情報工作;1997年10期

2 趙春e，

本文編號：2146307