【摘要】：現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度的核心是在國家的宏觀調(diào)控政策指導(dǎo)下,大學(xué)面向社會(huì),依法自主辦學(xué),實(shí)行科學(xué)管理。在國內(nèi),教授治學(xué)與教授治校作為備受爭(zhēng)議的一對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)概念,迄今為止學(xué)術(shù)界還未達(dá)成一致認(rèn)可。教授作為深化大學(xué)內(nèi)部改革,推動(dòng)現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度建設(shè)的支撐力量,深刻影響著高等教育的未來走向。在2010年頒布的《國家中長(zhǎng)期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2010年——2020年)》(全文以下簡(jiǎn)稱《教育規(guī)劃綱要》),明確提出,“充分發(fā)揮學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì)在學(xué)科建設(shè)、學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)、學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展中的重要作用,探索教授治學(xué)的有效途徑,充分發(fā)揮教授在教學(xué)、學(xué)術(shù)研究和學(xué)校管理中的作用”。有些教授既有行政色彩的官員身份,也是教書育人的學(xué)者形象,這種雙重身份使他們往往在需要做決策中難于平衡行政和學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力兩者之間的關(guān)系。對(duì)教授治學(xué)與教授治校的辨析,既要擺脫兩者相互抵制的思維模式,又要避免將兩者混淆,出現(xiàn)角色錯(cuò)位,而應(yīng)超越治學(xué)與治校的話語之爭(zhēng),將教授治學(xué)與治校這兩種要求統(tǒng)一于中國大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)和治理方式的制度安排中。具體而言,教授首先是學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力的代表,同時(shí)又是學(xué)校民主管理的主體,參與治校也是教授義不容辭的責(zé)任。本文從六個(gè)部分做了分析研究:文章緒論部分,主要概括了當(dāng)前教授治學(xué)治校研究的整體情況;第一章主要闡釋了現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度、教授治學(xué)和治校的內(nèi)涵。列舉了國外四所高�，F(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度中教授的角色定位,同時(shí)對(duì)中國的正在建立和形成的現(xiàn)代大學(xué)制度進(jìn)行了描述;第二章主要考察了西方大學(xué)教授治校的發(fā)展歷程,隨后分別從民國時(shí)期、建國以后計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)期和改革開放時(shí)期三個(gè)階段對(duì)中國高校由教授治校到教授治學(xué)的歷史轉(zhuǎn)變做了論述;第三章從教授治學(xué)與治校的內(nèi)在邏輯統(tǒng)一性,現(xiàn)實(shí)必然性和現(xiàn)實(shí)可行性三個(gè)方面深入剖析;第四章從教授治學(xué)與治校存在的問題與原因進(jìn)行分析;第五章以教授主導(dǎo)治學(xué),參與治校的角色為著力點(diǎn),分別從教授角色的科學(xué)定位、政治保證、主導(dǎo)治學(xué)、參與治校以及法制保障等方面提出建議和觀點(diǎn)。通過對(duì)以上觀點(diǎn)的探討,以期能夠使教授這一關(guān)鍵角色在我國高等教育事業(yè)發(fā)展中發(fā)揮積極作用。
[Abstract]:The core of the modern university system is that under the guidance of the national macro-control policy, the university faces the society, runs a school independently according to law, and carries out scientific management. As a pair of controversial academic concepts, professors and professors have not been accepted by academic circles. Professor, as a supporting force to deepen the reform of university interior and promote the construction of modern university system, has a profound influence on the future trend of higher education. The outline of the National Medium-and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan (2010-2020), promulgated in 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the "outline of the Education Plan") in 2010, clearly states, "give full play to the academic committee in discipline construction and academic evaluation," The important role of academic development, the exploration of effective ways for professors to study, to give full play to the role of professors in teaching, academic research and school management ". Some professors are not only administrative officials but also scholars who teach and educate people. This dual identity makes it difficult for them to balance the relationship between administration and academic power in making decisions. In order to distinguish the study of professor and the school of professor, we should not only get rid of the mode of thinking which both resist each other, but also avoid confusing the two and misplace their roles, and should transcend the argument between the study and the school. In this paper, the author unifies the two requirements of teaching and governing in the institutional arrangement of the internal governance structure and mode of governance in Chinese universities. To be specific, the professor is the representative of academic power and the main body of democratic management of school, and it is incumbent on the professor to take part in the administration of school. This article has done the analysis and research from six parts: the introduction part of the article, mainly summarized the whole situation of the current research of the professor scholarship, the first chapter mainly explained the modern university system, the teaching research and the school administration connotation. This paper enumerates the role orientation of professors in the modern university system of four foreign universities, and describes the modern university system that is being established and formed in China. Then from the period of the Republic of China, the period of planned economy and the period of reform and opening up after the founding of the people's Republic of China, the author discusses the historical transformation from the professor to the professor. The fourth chapter analyzes the problems and causes of teaching and running schools; the fifth chapter focuses on the role of professors in academic research and participation in the management of schools. Suggestions and viewpoints are put forward from the following aspects: the scientific orientation of the role of the professor, political assurance, leading the study, participating in the administration of the school and the guarantee of the legal system. Through the discussion of the above views, it is hoped that the key role of professor can play an active role in the development of higher education in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G647

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊興林;;論教授主導(dǎo)治學(xué)與參與治校的統(tǒng)一[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2015年01期

2 許杰;;建立健全教授委員會(huì)制度——基于試點(diǎn)院校的探索實(shí)踐[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年08期

3 胡林龍;;中美高校學(xué)術(shù)不端行為處理程序的比較研究——以中美部分高校學(xué)術(shù)規(guī)范為例[J];中國高教研究;2014年06期

4 茍朝莉;;高校應(yīng)由校長(zhǎng)與教授“共治”[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

5 胡建華;;略論大學(xué)去行政化[J];中國高教研究;2014年02期

6 熊萬曦;;世界一流大學(xué)校長(zhǎng)遴選過程研究——以2004年麻省理工學(xué)院校長(zhǎng)遴選為例[J];現(xiàn)代大學(xué)教育;2014年01期

7 趙蒙成;;“教授治�！钡膶�(shí)質(zhì)與邊界——與楊興林教授再商榷[J];江蘇高教;2013年02期

8 韓玉璞;;對(duì)教授治校關(guān)鍵問題的審視[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2013年03期

9 別敦榮;唐世綱;;論教授治學(xué)的理念與實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑[J];教育研究;2013年01期

10 徐先鳳;畢憲順;;共同治理:我國大學(xué)內(nèi)部治理模式的路徑選擇——從教授治校到教授治學(xué)引發(fā)的思考[J];東岳論叢;2013年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 彭陽紅;論“教授治�！盵D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2134337