發(fā)布時間：2018-08-23 15:04

【摘要】：目前作為對外漢語教學基礎的教材往往缺乏真實性,導致學習者交際失敗。通過教材評估,可以指出其中所存的問題,以提高教材質(zhì)量。鑒于這種情況,本文以《長城漢語·生存交際》、《漢語聽說教程》和《新實用漢語課本》三套對外漢語教材中的拒絕言語行為作為研究對象,探討并評估其語用的真實性及設計的科學性。 論文主要分為三個部分：在第一部分,在拒絕言語行為研究基礎上,我們對每種引發(fā)句(請求、邀請、提供以及建議)以及對每種關系(陌生、一般、好友、家人)總結(jié)出了典型的漢語拒絕語言行為策略組合以及語言手段(詞匯,句式)。在第二部分,我們對三套對外漢語教材中的拒絕言語行為進行了統(tǒng)計分析,通過其中所出現(xiàn)的拒絕策略與漢語拒絕研究結(jié)果的對比,討論教材中與實際交際中出現(xiàn)的拒絕言語行為的不同。同時也調(diào)查教材所涉及到的拒絕場景,拒絕手段以及表達拒絕言語行為的練習設計。本文指出,雖然三套教材中的拒絕言語行為大部分都符合漢語母語者的語用習慣,但是在這個領域上教材還是有所不足,如在每種場景出現(xiàn)的拒絕比例失調(diào),關鍵拒絕策略的缺少,特定場景設計的缺乏等等。最后,根據(jù)所獲得的結(jié)果,我們指出一些對建材編寫的建議。 通過此項研究我們希望使教材編者注意到教材中存在的問題,從而提供一些對于設計拒絕言語行為的對話、練習的啟示與指導。
[Abstract]:At present, teaching materials as the basis of teaching Chinese as a foreign language often lack authenticity, resulting in learners' communication failure. Through the evaluation of teaching materials, we can point out the existing problems in order to improve the quality of teaching materials. In view of this situation, this paper focuses on the refusal speech acts in three sets of textbooks, such as "the Great Wall Chinese Survival Communication", "Chinese listening and speaking course" and "New practical Chinese textbook". To explore and evaluate the authenticity of its pragmatics and the scientific nature of its design. The thesis is divided into three parts: in the first part, on the basis of the study of refusal speech act, we give each kind of triggered sentence (request, invitation, offer and suggestion), as well as every relationship (strange, general, good friend). Family members summarize the typical combination of Chinese refusal strategies and language devices (vocabulary, sentence structure). In the second part, we make a statistical analysis of the refusal speech acts in three sets of textbooks for TCFL, and compare the rejection strategies with the results of the Chinese refusal study. Discusses the differences between the refusal speech act in the textbook and the actual communication. At the same time, the text also investigated the rejection scenarios, refusal methods and practice design for expressing refusal speech acts. This paper points out that although most of the refusal speech acts in the three sets of textbooks conform to the pragmatic habits of Chinese native speakers, there are still some deficiencies in the textbooks in this field, such as the imbalance of rejection ratio in each scenario. Lack of key rejection strategies, lack of design of specific scenarios, etc. Finally, according to the results obtained, we point out some suggestions for building materials. Through this study, we hope to draw the textbook editors' attention to the problems existing in the textbook, thus providing some enlightenment and guidance for the dialogue and practice in the design of refusal speech acts.
【學位授予單位】：北京外國語大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H195.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 欒義敏;;拒絕言語行為的禮貌問題研究[J];安徽工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2011年03期

2 李瑋;漢、英拒絕言語行為表達方式之比較[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2005年S1期

3 何春燕;;我國語用能力培養(yǎng)研究述評[J];外語教學理論與實踐;2011年04期

4 唐玲;漢語間接拒絕言語行為的表層策略分析[J];廣西社會科學;2004年10期

5 茹英;;中美文化背景下的拒絕言語行為——跨文化語用學視角下的言語行為[J];科教文匯(上旬刊);2011年08期

6 王君瑞;語用學和外語教學[J];外語學刊(黑龍江大學學報);1996年04期

7 馬月蘭;中美“拒絕”言語行為比較研究[J];青海師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1998年04期

8 馬月蘭;從語篇表層談中、美拒絕策略[J];齊齊哈爾大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年04期

9 姚俊;從英漢拒絕策略的語用對比看中西文化差異[J];山東外語教學;2003年01期

10 牛淑杰;;文化價值觀與英漢拒絕言語行為交際風格的對比研究[J];聊城大學學報(社會科學版);2006年03期

，

本文編號：2199429