漢語存現(xiàn)句的句法—語用界面研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-13 16:01
【摘要】：本研究采用句法—語用界面的視角,對漢語存現(xiàn)句中相關(guān)句法語用問題進(jìn)行了辨認(rèn)與分析。根據(jù)句法—語用界面的觀點(diǎn),某個(gè)句法結(jié)構(gòu)的闡釋不僅會涉及句法領(lǐng)域,而且會涉及句法—語用的界面。在本文的分析框架中,句法-語用界面主要涉及到兩個(gè)層面,即“前邏輯形式”層面和“后邏輯形式”層面,而這兩個(gè)層面的語用分析都是在關(guān)聯(lián)理論的總體框架之內(nèi)進(jìn)行的。本文研究的漢語存現(xiàn)句問題包括如下幾個(gè)方面：(1)動詞使用的限制；(2)論元句法位置的錯(cuò)位；(3)名詞的格位；(4)有定效應(yīng)。此外,本文還探討了存現(xiàn)動詞“有”的相關(guān)語法特征。 為了開展句法—語用界而研究,有必要辨別哪些問題屬于純句法問題,哪些屬于句法—語用界面問題。 在純句法問題方面,本文基于生成語言學(xué)的基本觀點(diǎn),發(fā)展了一個(gè)句法推導(dǎo)的模式。該模式一方面可以解決漢語存現(xiàn)句的一些問題,同時(shí)也可為句法—語用界面的研究提供出發(fā)點(diǎn)和句法基礎(chǔ)。本文認(rèn)為,漢語存現(xiàn)句中論元的句法位置、動詞限制的大多數(shù)方面以及名詞的格位問題可以在句法分析領(lǐng)域得到解決。漢語存現(xiàn)句的句法生成模式是基于事體結(jié)構(gòu)向句法結(jié)構(gòu)的映射。。一個(gè)復(fù)雜的事體包括一個(gè)外在論元和一個(gè)內(nèi)在的簡單事體。該復(fù)雜事體結(jié)構(gòu)存在的前提是外在論元能與內(nèi)在事體通過某個(gè)語義鏈建立聯(lián)系。漢語存現(xiàn)句表達(dá)的也是復(fù)雜事體,其中方位詞充當(dāng)外在論元,其與內(nèi)在事體建立聯(lián)系的前提是內(nèi)在事體發(fā)生在這個(gè)方位之內(nèi)。因此,存現(xiàn)句中復(fù)雜事體結(jié)構(gòu)中聯(lián)系外存論元和內(nèi)在事體的語義鏈?zhǔn)乔髮儆陬I(lǐng)屬關(guān)系的方位關(guān)系。當(dāng)一個(gè)復(fù)雜事體映射到句法結(jié)構(gòu)上時(shí),外在論元處于句法較高處從而能夠充當(dāng)主語,而內(nèi)在事體中的論元則只能出現(xiàn)在動詞后的位置。基于本研究提出的事體結(jié)構(gòu)映射的假設(shè),“非有存現(xiàn)句”(即動詞不是“有”)中方位詞將出現(xiàn)在主語位置,另一個(gè)論元則出現(xiàn)在動詞后的位置。根據(jù)這個(gè)句法生成的模式,漢語存現(xiàn)句中的“論元錯(cuò)位”現(xiàn)象可獲得解讀。這個(gè)句法生成模式也意味著只要動詞所表達(dá)的事體能夠在外在論元所指代的方位中發(fā)生就能夠獲得允準(zhǔn),從而解釋了漢語存現(xiàn)句中的動詞不局限于非賓格動詞的語法現(xiàn)象。至于漢語存現(xiàn)句中的名詞格位問題,我們基于漢語無格的假說,認(rèn)為漢語的名詞不需要通過格位獲得允準(zhǔn)。對于動詞是“有”的存現(xiàn)句,如果“有”后面的名詞沒有帶謂詞,則表達(dá)的是簡單事體結(jié)構(gòu),所有的句子成分都投射到“動詞詞組”領(lǐng)域內(nèi)。如果“有”后面接有謂詞,則該句體現(xiàn)的是復(fù)雜事體；與“非有”的存現(xiàn)句體現(xiàn)的復(fù)雜事體不同的是,這類存現(xiàn)句中連接外在論元和內(nèi)在事體的語義鏈?zhǔn)峭ㄟ^動詞“有”直接傳達(dá)的。 本研究的重點(diǎn)是漢語存現(xiàn)句的句法—語用界面問題。本文提出,在“前邏輯形式”層面,需要解決的句法—語用界面問題包括復(fù)雜事體結(jié)構(gòu)形成過程中的語用推理和及物動詞在存現(xiàn)句中的論元限制。這一層面的界面問題指的是句法和語用在“邏輯形式”形成前發(fā)生互動,最終生成表達(dá)邏輯形式的合格結(jié)構(gòu)。這個(gè)層面的互動有兩類：(1)復(fù)雜事體結(jié)構(gòu)中外在論元和內(nèi)在事體結(jié)構(gòu)之間語義鏈的語用推理。在句法生成的過程中,外在論元與內(nèi)在事體結(jié)構(gòu)的聯(lián)系不是動詞或者句法結(jié)構(gòu)賦予的,而是語言使用者的語用推理所產(chǎn)生的,因此在句子生成過程的早期,語用推理就已經(jīng)介入其中了。根據(jù)關(guān)聯(lián)理論,在獲得最佳關(guān)聯(lián)的過程中,聽話人結(jié)合普遍的句法結(jié)構(gòu)、詞匯信息和非語言的語境信息,最終推導(dǎo)出合理的邏輯形式,因此這個(gè)推理是獲得“顯義”過程中的一個(gè)步驟。(2)語言信息處理。本研究將語法的信息處理納于關(guān)聯(lián)理論框架之內(nèi),認(rèn)為有些句法結(jié)構(gòu)之所以不合格,是因?yàn)槁犜捳咴趯で笤捳Z最佳關(guān)聯(lián)的過程中,由于付出的處理努力過高,最終放棄處理努力,以至認(rèn)為句法結(jié)構(gòu)不合法。在漢語存現(xiàn)句中及物動詞的施事之所以不能出現(xiàn),是由于將施事論元置于及物動詞后會增加語言信息處理的壓力,導(dǎo)致使用者一般不接受此類結(jié)構(gòu)。 在“后邏輯形式”層面,句法—語用界而研究要解決的問題主要是有定效應(yīng)問題。一個(gè)符合語法并且傳達(dá)邏輯形式命題的句子結(jié)構(gòu),有可能因?yàn)槭艿秸Z用因素的影響而不被接受。本文發(fā)展了關(guān)聯(lián)理論對于名詞指代在語用推理中的作用,認(rèn)為一個(gè)名詞的指代是否具有可及性,關(guān)鍵是看其在信息結(jié)構(gòu)中的角色,當(dāng)信息結(jié)構(gòu)要求明確指代的名詞在語篇中沒有明確的指代時(shí),句子的可接受度就會降低。句子的話題/焦點(diǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)以及名詞本身的信息特征共同允準(zhǔn)一個(gè)名詞是否能在句中出現(xiàn)。動詞后的有定名詞可以獲得話題/焦點(diǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)允準(zhǔn),只要其傳達(dá)的信息不屬于話語預(yù)設(shè)信息的一部分。然而有定名詞本身的信息特征需要其指稱的對象對于聽話者來說是可及的。由于指稱對象的確認(rèn)需要語境的支持,因此在沒有語境的前提下存現(xiàn)句動詞后的有定名詞一般不能被語言使用者接受。這也同時(shí)解釋了為什么有定效應(yīng)在某些語境下可以違反的現(xiàn)象。這個(gè)分析同時(shí)也可以用于對動詞為“有”的存現(xiàn)句的研究：一個(gè)不定名詞一般不能放在句首,但是當(dāng)其處于“有”后面時(shí),則可以獲得允準(zhǔn)。根據(jù)信息結(jié)構(gòu)以及“有”字句的句法結(jié)構(gòu),不定名詞放在句首是因?yàn)榫涫孜恢玫拿~一般是話題,必須提供一個(gè)預(yù)設(shè)的信息作為話語的起點(diǎn),而不定名詞的指代一般來說并不在聽話人的預(yù)設(shè)中,從而導(dǎo)致句子不被聽話人接受。當(dāng)不定名詞處于“有”后時(shí),它不再是話題,不一定需要提供可及的指代,因此可以獲得允準(zhǔn)。此類結(jié)構(gòu)的特征使得其經(jīng)常行使兩種功能：(1)將一個(gè)新的實(shí)體介紹到語境中；(2)為下文語篇提供話題。 本研究有如下幾方面的意義。(1)本研究在宏觀上分析了句法-語用界面研究的兩個(gè)層面,同時(shí)闡明了具體操作中的理論框架,為句法—語用界面研究提供了一定的借鑒意義。(2)本研究拓展了關(guān)聯(lián)理論的應(yīng)用范圍,通過具體的步驟闡明了該理論在句法-語用界面研究中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。(3)基于事體結(jié)構(gòu)向句法結(jié)構(gòu)映射的句法推導(dǎo)模式也為句法研究提供了新的視角。(4)解決了漢語存現(xiàn)句中的主要句法語用問題,對于語法教學(xué)特別是對外、漢語教學(xué)具有重要啟示。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of syntactic-pragmatic interface, this study identifies and analyzes the relevant syntactic and pragmatic problems in Chinese existential sentences. According to the viewpoint of syntactic-pragmatic interface, the interpretation of a syntactic structure involves not only the syntactic field, but also the syntactic-pragmatic interface. It involves two levels, namely, the "pre-logical form" level and the "post-logical form" level, and the pragmatic analysis of these two levels is carried out within the framework of relevance theory. In addition, the grammatical features of the existential verb "You" are also discussed.
In order to carry out the study in the field of syntax-pragmatics, it is necessary to distinguish which problems belong to pure syntax and which belong to Syntax-Pragmatics interface.
Based on the basic viewpoint of generative linguistics, this paper develops a syntactic deduction model, which can solve some problems of Chinese existential sentences and provide a starting point and syntactic basis for the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface. Most aspects of word restriction and the case-position problem of nouns can be solved in the field of syntactic analysis. The syntactic generation pattern of Chinese existential sentences is based on the mapping of event structure to syntactic structure. The argument can be connected with the intrinsic event through a semantic chain. The Chinese existential sentence is also a complex event, in which the locative word acts as the extrinsic argument, and the premise of its connection with the intrinsic event is that the intrinsic event occurs within this position. Chain is to find the orientation relation belonging to the possessive relation. When a complex event is mapped to the syntactic structure, the external argument is at a higher syntactic level and can act as the subject, while the argument in the internal event can only appear after the verb. According to this pattern of syntactic generation, the phenomenon of "argument dislocation" in Chinese existential sentences can be interpreted. This syntactic generation pattern also means that as long as the object expressed by the verb can be represented in the position of the external argument. As for the nominal case in Chinese existential sentences, based on the Chinese unqualified hypothesis, we hold that Chinese nouns do not need to be allowed by case. For existential sentences where verbs are "you", if "you" are "you", the noun case in Chinese existential sentences does not need to be allowed by case. The noun after you has no predicate, it expresses a simple event structure, and all the sentence elements are projected into the field of verb phrases. And the semantic chain of internal things is directly conveyed by the verb "yes".
The focus of this study is on the syntactic-pragmatic interface of Chinese existential sentences.This paper proposes that the syntactic-pragmatic interface problems to be solved at the "pre-logical form" level include the pragmatic inference in the formation of complex event structures and the argument limitation of transitive verbs in existential sentences. Pragmatics interacts before the formation of "logical form" and eventually produces a qualified structure for expressing logical form. There are two types of interaction at this level: (1) Pragmatic reasoning of the semantic chain between the external argument and the internal event structure in a complex event structure. In the process of syntactic generation, the connection between the external argument and the internal event structure is not a verb. According to Relevance Theory, in the process of obtaining the optimal relevance, the hearer combines the general syntactic structure, lexical information and non-linguistic context information to derive the conjunction. In this study, grammatical information processing is incorporated into the framework of Relevance Theory, and some syntactic structures are found to be unqualified because of the efforts made by the listener in seeking the optimal relevance of the utterance. In Chinese existential sentences, the agent of the transitive verb can not appear because putting the agent argument behind the transitive verb will increase the pressure of language information processing, resulting in users generally not accepting such a structure.
At the post-logical level, the problem to be solved in the field of syntax and pragmatics is mainly the problem of definite effect. A sentence structure which conforms to grammar and conveys the proposition of logical form may not be accepted because it is influenced by pragmatic factors. Whether a noun's denotation is accessible or not depends on its role in the information structure. The acceptability of a sentence decreases when the denotative noun is not explicitly denoted in the text. The topic/focus structure of a sentence and the information characteristics of the noun itself allow a noun to be accepted or not. A definite noun after a verb can obtain the permission of the topic/focus structure as long as the information it conveys is not part of the presupposition information of the discourse. It also explains why certain effects can be violated in certain contexts. This analysis can also be used in the study of existential sentences where the verb is "you": an infinitive noun is generally not placed at the beginning of a sentence. According to the information structure and the syntactic structure of the sentence, the indefinite noun is placed at the beginning of the sentence because the noun at the beginning of the sentence is generally a topic and must provide a presupposed information as the starting point of the discourse, while the indefinite noun's denotation is generally not in the listener's presupposition. When the adverbial noun is after "you", it is no longer a topic and does not necessarily need to provide accessible references, so it can be granted.
This study has the following significance. (1) This study analyzes two aspects of the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface from a macroscopic perspective, and clarifies the theoretical framework of the specific operation, which provides a certain reference for the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface. (2) This study expands the scope of application of relevance theory and clarifies it through specific steps. The application value of the theory in the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface. (3) The syntactic deduction model based on the mapping of event structure to syntactic structure also provides a new perspective for syntactic research. (4) It solves the main syntactic and pragmatic problems in Chinese existential sentences and has important implications for grammar teaching, especially for foreigners.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：H146
本文編號：2181479
[Abstract]:From the perspective of syntactic-pragmatic interface, this study identifies and analyzes the relevant syntactic and pragmatic problems in Chinese existential sentences. According to the viewpoint of syntactic-pragmatic interface, the interpretation of a syntactic structure involves not only the syntactic field, but also the syntactic-pragmatic interface. It involves two levels, namely, the "pre-logical form" level and the "post-logical form" level, and the pragmatic analysis of these two levels is carried out within the framework of relevance theory. In addition, the grammatical features of the existential verb "You" are also discussed.
In order to carry out the study in the field of syntax-pragmatics, it is necessary to distinguish which problems belong to pure syntax and which belong to Syntax-Pragmatics interface.
Based on the basic viewpoint of generative linguistics, this paper develops a syntactic deduction model, which can solve some problems of Chinese existential sentences and provide a starting point and syntactic basis for the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface. Most aspects of word restriction and the case-position problem of nouns can be solved in the field of syntactic analysis. The syntactic generation pattern of Chinese existential sentences is based on the mapping of event structure to syntactic structure. The argument can be connected with the intrinsic event through a semantic chain. The Chinese existential sentence is also a complex event, in which the locative word acts as the extrinsic argument, and the premise of its connection with the intrinsic event is that the intrinsic event occurs within this position. Chain is to find the orientation relation belonging to the possessive relation. When a complex event is mapped to the syntactic structure, the external argument is at a higher syntactic level and can act as the subject, while the argument in the internal event can only appear after the verb. According to this pattern of syntactic generation, the phenomenon of "argument dislocation" in Chinese existential sentences can be interpreted. This syntactic generation pattern also means that as long as the object expressed by the verb can be represented in the position of the external argument. As for the nominal case in Chinese existential sentences, based on the Chinese unqualified hypothesis, we hold that Chinese nouns do not need to be allowed by case. For existential sentences where verbs are "you", if "you" are "you", the noun case in Chinese existential sentences does not need to be allowed by case. The noun after you has no predicate, it expresses a simple event structure, and all the sentence elements are projected into the field of verb phrases. And the semantic chain of internal things is directly conveyed by the verb "yes".
The focus of this study is on the syntactic-pragmatic interface of Chinese existential sentences.This paper proposes that the syntactic-pragmatic interface problems to be solved at the "pre-logical form" level include the pragmatic inference in the formation of complex event structures and the argument limitation of transitive verbs in existential sentences. Pragmatics interacts before the formation of "logical form" and eventually produces a qualified structure for expressing logical form. There are two types of interaction at this level: (1) Pragmatic reasoning of the semantic chain between the external argument and the internal event structure in a complex event structure. In the process of syntactic generation, the connection between the external argument and the internal event structure is not a verb. According to Relevance Theory, in the process of obtaining the optimal relevance, the hearer combines the general syntactic structure, lexical information and non-linguistic context information to derive the conjunction. In this study, grammatical information processing is incorporated into the framework of Relevance Theory, and some syntactic structures are found to be unqualified because of the efforts made by the listener in seeking the optimal relevance of the utterance. In Chinese existential sentences, the agent of the transitive verb can not appear because putting the agent argument behind the transitive verb will increase the pressure of language information processing, resulting in users generally not accepting such a structure.
At the post-logical level, the problem to be solved in the field of syntax and pragmatics is mainly the problem of definite effect. A sentence structure which conforms to grammar and conveys the proposition of logical form may not be accepted because it is influenced by pragmatic factors. Whether a noun's denotation is accessible or not depends on its role in the information structure. The acceptability of a sentence decreases when the denotative noun is not explicitly denoted in the text. The topic/focus structure of a sentence and the information characteristics of the noun itself allow a noun to be accepted or not. A definite noun after a verb can obtain the permission of the topic/focus structure as long as the information it conveys is not part of the presupposition information of the discourse. It also explains why certain effects can be violated in certain contexts. This analysis can also be used in the study of existential sentences where the verb is "you": an infinitive noun is generally not placed at the beginning of a sentence. According to the information structure and the syntactic structure of the sentence, the indefinite noun is placed at the beginning of the sentence because the noun at the beginning of the sentence is generally a topic and must provide a presupposed information as the starting point of the discourse, while the indefinite noun's denotation is generally not in the listener's presupposition. When the adverbial noun is after "you", it is no longer a topic and does not necessarily need to provide accessible references, so it can be granted.
This study has the following significance. (1) This study analyzes two aspects of the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface from a macroscopic perspective, and clarifies the theoretical framework of the specific operation, which provides a certain reference for the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface. (2) This study expands the scope of application of relevance theory and clarifies it through specific steps. The application value of the theory in the study of syntactic-pragmatic interface. (3) The syntactic deduction model based on the mapping of event structure to syntactic structure also provides a new perspective for syntactic research. (4) It solves the main syntactic and pragmatic problems in Chinese existential sentences and has important implications for grammar teaching, especially for foreigners.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：H146
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐杰;兩種保留賓語句式及相關(guān)句法理論問題[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);1999年01期
2 潘海華;韓景泉;;虛詞there的句法地位及相關(guān)理論問題[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2006年01期
3 張克定;句式變化的認(rèn)知語用理據(jù)[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期
4 胡旭輝;;關(guān)聯(lián)理論與喬姆斯基語言學(xué)共性初探及反思[J];外語學(xué)刊;2008年02期
5 張克定;Verschueren的語用理論對語用句法研究的啟示[J];外語教學(xué);2002年05期
6 李京廉;;英漢存現(xiàn)句中的定指效應(yīng)研究[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2009年02期
7 張克定;語用句法學(xué)論綱[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2000年10期
8 熊仲儒;;主語語法功能的分配[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2006年01期
9 胡旭輝;;漢語話題結(jié)構(gòu)制約的認(rèn)知語義與語用分析[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年03期
10 韓景泉;領(lǐng)有名詞提升移位與格理論[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2000年03期
，本文編號：2181479
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/duiwaihanyulunwen/2181479.html
最近更新
教材專著
