本文選題：導(dǎo)學(xué)案 + 初中數(shù)學(xué)　； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：新課標(biāo)下的初中數(shù)學(xué)教學(xué)已經(jīng)進(jìn)行了改革.新課改提倡以學(xué)生為中心,充分發(fā)揮學(xué)生的主動性和積極性.當(dāng)前的數(shù)學(xué)課堂已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了許多新的教學(xué)模式,以蘇州地區(qū)為例,大多數(shù)初中學(xué)校的教師開始集體備課,寫教案,編制學(xué)案,讓學(xué)生形成了“學(xué)案-預(yù)習(xí)-上課-反饋”這樣的模式.但是在沸沸揚(yáng)揚(yáng)的導(dǎo)學(xué)案熱風(fēng)背后,在短期光鮮的成果背后,有著很多值得思考的問題,導(dǎo)學(xué)案是否真正做到讓學(xué)生成為課堂的主人,是否落實(shí)學(xué)生自主學(xué)習(xí)能力的培養(yǎng),是否可以確保學(xué)生知識上、能力上、思想方法上的掌握和提升,是否引發(fā)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)數(shù)學(xué)的熱情和追求真理的好奇心等,這些問題都是教師實(shí)施導(dǎo)學(xué)案時必須時刻意識到的,并且需要教師不斷通過實(shí)踐總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn),進(jìn)一ki對學(xué)案的使用有所選擇.在新一輪基礎(chǔ)教育課程改革的理念指導(dǎo)下,本調(diào)查研究選擇蘇州市振華中學(xué)初中二年級學(xué)生為被試對象,以學(xué)生為主體,建構(gòu)主義和主觀能動性為理論依據(jù),采用調(diào)查問卷法和訪談法進(jìn)行研究,并對初中數(shù)學(xué)導(dǎo)學(xué)案教學(xué)模式進(jìn)行了親身實(shí)踐體會,主要得出以下結(jié)論:1.初中生主觀能動性缺乏,導(dǎo)學(xué)案模式雖利于學(xué)優(yōu)生的自主學(xué)習(xí),但是對后進(jìn)生作用不大;2.導(dǎo)學(xué)案模式有很好的知識預(yù)設(shè),但也存在束縛,不利于教師和學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)的展開;3.導(dǎo)學(xué)案編制過程較為復(fù)雜,目前一些學(xué)校的具體操作還不夠完善與合理.
[Abstract]:Under the new curriculum, the junior middle school mathematics teaching has been reformed. The new curriculum reform advocates taking students as the center, giving full play to the initiative and enthusiasm of the students. There have been a number of new teaching modes in the current mathematics classroom. Taking the Suzhou area as an example, most of the teachers in junior middle schools start to prepare lessons collectively, write teaching plans, and make students form a case, so that students form the form. It has become a model of "study case - Preview - class - feedback". But behind the hot wind of the guide case, there are many problems to be thought behind in the short term results. Whether the guide case really makes the students become the master of the class, whether the students can realize the students' ability to learn from the master, and whether they can ensure the students' knowledge. It is necessary for teachers to realize their enthusiasm and curiosity in the pursuit of truth in their ability to grasp and improve their ideas and methods. These are all the problems that teachers must realize when they carry out the guidance case, and they need teachers to constantly summarize their experience through practice and choose a ki for the use of the case. Under the guidance of the concept of curriculum reform, the study selected the two grade students in Zhenhua middle school in Suzhou as the subjects, taking students as the subject, constructivism and subjective initiative as the theoretical basis, using questionnaire and interview method, and carried out personal experience on the teaching mode of junior middle school mathematics teaching case. The following conclusions are drawn: 1. the lack of subjective initiative of junior high school students, although the guide case model is beneficial to the self-study of the eugenics, but it has little effect on the underachiever; the 2. guide case model has a good knowledge presupposition, but it also has constraints, which is not conducive to the development of teachers and students, the 3. guide case is more complex, and the concrete exercises of some schools at present. The work is not perfect and reasonable.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 丁美玲;;導(dǎo)學(xué)案教學(xué)模式實(shí)施研究[J];教育教學(xué)論壇;2013年43期

2 洪明;余文森;;“先學(xué)后教”教學(xué)模式的理念與實(shí)施條件——基于杜郎口中學(xué)、洋思中學(xué)和東廬中學(xué)教學(xué)改革的思考[J];中國教育學(xué)刊;2011年03期

，

本文編號：1834126